Difficulties in initial algebra learning in Indonesia

Within mathematics curricula, algebra has been widely recognized as one of the most difficult topics, which leads to learning difficulties worldwide. In Indonesia, algebra performance is an important issue. In the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) 2007, Indonesian students’ achievement in the algebra domain was significantly below the average student performance in other Southeast Asian countries such as Thailand, Malaysia, and Singapore. This fact gave rise to this study which aims to investigate Indonesian students’ difficulties in algebra. In order to do so, a literature study was carried out on students’ difficulties in initial algebra. Next, an individual written test on algebra tasks was administered, followed by interviews. A sample of 51 grade VII Indonesian students worked the written test, and 37 of them were interviewed afterwards. Data analysis revealed that mathematization, i.e., the ability to translate back and forth between the world of the problem situation and the world of mathematics and to reorganize the mathematical system itself, constituted the most frequently observed difficulty in both the written test and the interview data. Other observed difficulties concerned understanding algebraic expressions, applying arithmetic operations in numerical and algebraic expressions, understanding the different meanings of the equal sign, and understanding variables. The consequences of these findings on both task design and further research in algebra education are discussed.

[1]  A. Sáenz-Ludlow,et al.  Third Graders' Interpretations of Equality and the Equal Symbol , 1998 .

[2]  D. Pratt,et al.  A Substituting Meaning for the Equals Sign in Arithmetic Notating Tasks , 2012 .

[3]  Paul Drijvers,et al.  Secondary Algebra Education , 2010 .

[4]  Liora Linchevski,et al.  Crossing the cognitive gap between arithmetic and algebra: Operating on the unknown in the context of equations , 1996 .

[5]  M. MacGregor,et al.  Cognitive models underlying algebraic and non-algebraic solutions to unequal partition problems , 1998 .

[6]  Marja van den Heuvel-Panhuizen,et al.  The didactical Use of Models in Realistic Mathematics Education : An Example from a Longitudinal Trajectory on Percentage , 2003 .

[7]  Christian Bokhove,et al.  Use of ICT for acquiring, practicing and assessing algebraic expertise , 2011 .

[8]  Trevor Williams,et al.  Highlights from TIMSS 2007: Mathematics and Science Achievement of U.S. Fourth- and Eighth-Grade Students in an International Context. NCES 2009-001. , 2008 .

[9]  Paul Drijvers,et al.  Learning algebra in a computer algebra environment : design research on the understanding of the concept of parameter , 2003 .

[10]  A. Sfard.  On the dual nature of mathematical conceptions: Reflections on processes and objects as different sides of the same coin , 1991 .

[11]  Kaye Stacey,et al.  The future of the teaching and learning of algebra : the 12th ICMI study , 2004 .

[12]  Angeliki Kolovou,et al.  Mathematical problem solving in primary school , 2011 .

[13]  K. Stacey,et al.  Algebra: A World of Difference , 2004 .

[14]  A. Treffers.  Three Dimensions: A Model of Goal and Theory Description in Mathematics Instruction ― The Wiskobas Project , 1986 .

[15]  Liora Linchevski,et al.  Algebra with Numbers and Arithmetic with Letters: A Definition of Pre-algebra. , 1995 .

[16]  Paul Drijvers,et al.  Symbol Sense Behavior in Digital Activities , 2010 .

[17]  Elizabeth Warren,et al.  The role of arithmetic structure in the transition from arithmetic to algebra , 2003 .

[18]  B. V. Amerom.  Focusing on informal strategies when linking arithmetic to early algebra , 2003 .

[19]  Hans Freudenthal,et al.  Revisiting mathematics education : China lectures , 1991 .

[20]  Maarten Dolk,et al.  Reforming mathematics learning in Indonesian classrooms through RME , 2008 .

[21]  Carolyn Kieran.  Concepts associated with the equality symbol , 1981 .

[22]  D. Tall,et al.  Encouraging versatile thinking in algebra using the computer , 1991 .

[23]  David E. Wiley,et al.  Many Visions, Many Aims , 1997 .

[24]  Arthur F. Coxford,et al.  The Ideas of algebra, K-12 : 1988 yearbook , 1988 .

[25]  Peter Rosnick,et al.  Some Misconceptions concerning the Concept of Variable. , 1981 .

[26]  Hitendra Pillay,et al.  Sequential development of algebra knowledge: A cognitive analysis , 1998 .

[27]  Paul Drijvers,et al.  Secondary algebra education : revisiting topics and themes and exploring the unknown , 2011 .

[28]  Bronisław Czarnocha,et al.  From Arithmetic to Algebra , 2016 .

[29]  Liora Linchevski,et al.  A cognitive gap between arithmetic and algebra , 1994 .

[30]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[31]  A. Arcavi.  Symbol Sense: Informal Sense-Making in Formal Mathematics. , 1994 .

[32]  Zulkardi Zulkardi,et al.  Developing a learning environment on realistic mathematics education for Indonesian student teachers , 2002 .

[33]  M. Heuvel-Panhuizen.  Mathematics education in the Netherlands: A guided tour 1 , 2001 .

[34]  B. A. van Amerom,et al.  Reinvention of early algebra : developmental research on the transition from arithmetic to algebra = Heruitvinden van aanvankelijke algebra : ontwikkelingsonderzoek roud de overgang van rekenen naar algebra , 2002 .

[35]  I. Mullis.  TIMSS 1999 international mathematics report : Findings from IEA's repeat of the third international mathematics and science study at the eighth grade , 2000 .

[36]  Steven J. Chrostowski,et al.  TIMSS 2003 International Mathematics Report: Findings from IEA's Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study at the Fourth and Eighth Grades. , 2004 .