Three-dimensional dynamic susceptibility-weighted perfusion MR imaging at 3.0 T: feasibility and contrast agent dose.

PURPOSE To prospectively investigate if T2*-weighted dynamic susceptibility-weighted first-pass perfusion magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is feasible at 3.0 T and which dose of contrast agent is suitable for high-field-strength imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS Informed consent was obtained from all participants; study protocol was approved by the institutional review board. Study included three volunteers (two men, one woman aged 35, 39, and 52 years) and 26 patients (mean age, 49 years +/- 12.8 [standard deviation]; range, 19-76 years). Volunteers underwent 3.0-T perfusion MR imaging with 0.20, 0.10, and 0.05 mmol per kilogram body weight of gadopentetate dimeglumine; patients underwent imaging with 0.10- and 0.05-mmol doses. Perfusion MR imaging was performed with three-dimensional echo-shifted echo-planar imaging (repetition time msec/echo time msec, 14/21; isotropic 4 mm3 voxels; 50 dynamic volumes with 30 sections each, covering entire brain at temporal resolution of 1.5 seconds per MR image). Quality of source echo-planar images and perfusion maps was assessed; perfusion maps obtained at studies with different contrast media doses were compared. Quantitative perfusion values and diagnostic sensitivity of perfusion studies with 0.10-mmol dose were compared with results with 0.05-mmol dose. Image quality scores were compared with marginal homogeneity test for multinomial variables (Mantel-Haenszel statistics for ordered categorized values). Signal-to-noise ratio and baseline signal intensity in perfusion studies were tested (Student t test for paired samples). Mean transit time (MTT), negative integral (NI), and maximum T2* effect from region-of-interest analysis were compared (one-tailed Student t test for paired samples). Quantitative data on number of gamma-fitted pixels were compared (t test for paired samples). Difference with P=.05 (t test for paired samples) was considered significant. RESULTS Perfusion image quality was satisfactory even in areas close to skull base (47 of 52 images, minor distortions; remaining images, marked distortions). Perfusion imaging with 0.20-mmol dose caused almost complete signal cancellation during first pass, particularly in cortical gray matter, since mean maximum T2* effect of 98%, 99%, and 98% for gray matter was reached such that the accurate calculation of perfusion maps was impossible. With 0.10-mmol dose, the NI and maximum T2* effect were comparable to published data for 1.5-T perfusion imaging with 0.20- and 0.05-mmol doses; perfusion maps of sufficient diagnostic quality were obtained. For gray matter, mean maximum T2* effect was 25.4% +/- 9.8 with 0.10-mmol dose and 17.5% +/- 9.0 with 0.05-mmol dose. For white matter, mean maximum T2* effect was 15.2% +/- 4.5 with 0.10-mmol dose and 7.7% +/- 2.9 with 0.05-mmol dose. Difference in maximum signal intensity decrease was significant (P <.01). For NI, the difference between 0.10- and 0.05-mmol doses was significant: For gray matter, mean NI was 3.1 +/- 1.60 for 0.10-mmol dose and 1.56 +/- 1.16 for 0.05-mmol dose. For white matter, mean NI was 1.35 +/- 0.59 with 0.1-mmol dose and 0.59 +/- 0.30 with 0.05-mmol dose. CONCLUSION With echo-shifted multishot echo-planar imaging, dynamic susceptibility-weighted perfusion MR imaging at high field strength is feasible without relevant image distortions. Compared with contrast agent dose for 1.5 T imaging, the dose for 3.0 T can be reduced to 0.10 mmol.

[1]  Mark S. Cohen,et al.  Contrast agents and cerebral hemodynamics , 1991, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[2]  J A Frank,et al.  3D Bolus Tracking with Frequency‐Shifted BURST MRI , 1994, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[3]  G. Glover,et al.  Neuroimaging at 1.5 T and 3.0 T: Comparison of oxygenation‐sensitive magnetic resonance imaging , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[4]  V Ganesan,et al.  MR Perfusion Imaging in Moyamoya Syndrome: Potential Implications for Clinical Evaluation of Occlusive Cerebrovascular Disease , 2001, Stroke.

[5]  V. Tronnier,et al.  Distinguishing of primary cerebral lymphoma from high-grade glioma with perfusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging , 2003, Neuroscience Letters.

[6]  Jeroen van der Grond,et al.  Model of the human vasculature for studying the influence of contrast injection speed on cerebral perfusion MRI , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[7]  S M Davis,et al.  Perfusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging Maps in Hyperacute Stroke: Relative Cerebral Blood Flow Most Accurately Identifies Tissue Destined to Infarct , 2001, Stroke.

[8]  Robert Turner,et al.  Diffusion and perfusion magnetic resonance imaging in brain tumors , 1993, Topics in magnetic resonance imaging : TMRI.

[9]  A. Jackson,et al.  Abnormalities of the contrast re‐circulation phase in cerebral tumors demonstrated using dynamic susceptibility contrast‐enhanced imaging: A possible marker of vascular tortuosity , 2000, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[10]  T. Benner,et al.  Cerebral MR perfusion imaging: First clinical application of a 1 M gadolinium chelate (Gadovist 1.0) in a double‐blinded randomized dose‐finding study , 2000, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[11]  A. Jackson,et al.  Cerebral perfusion imaging using contrast-enhanced MRI. , 2003, Clinical radiology.

[12]  F Träber,et al.  Ultra‐fast three‐dimensional MR perfusion imaging of the entire brain in acute stroke assessment , 2000, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[13]  K. Uğurbil,et al.  Experimental determination of the BOLD field strength dependence in vessels and tissue , 1997, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[14]  D. Le Bihan,et al.  Cerebral hemodynamics in CADASIL before and after acetazolamide challenge assessed with MRI bolus tracking. , 2000, Stroke.

[15]  M. J Firbank,et al.  Regional cerebral blood flow in Parkinson's disease with and without dementia , 2003, NeuroImage.

[16]  M. Könönen,et al.  Cerebral Hemodynamics in Human Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Study with Diffusion- and Perfusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging and SPECT , 2000, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[17]  T. Benner,et al.  Comparison of echo-planar sequences for perfusion-weighted MRI: which is best? , 1998, Neuroradiology.

[18]  S. Heiland,et al.  Untersuchungen zur Kontrastmitteldosierung bei der perfusionsgewichteten MRT , 1997 .

[19]  W. Yuh,et al.  Guidelines and recommendations for perfusion imaging in cerebral ischemia: A scientific statement for healthcare professionals by the writing group on perfusion imaging, from the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology of the American Heart Association. , 2003, Stroke.

[20]  M. Essig,et al.  Vergleich von MultiHance® und Gadovist® zur zerebralen MR-Perfusionsmessung bei gesunden Probanden , 2002, Der Radiologe.

[21]  P. Renshaw,et al.  Regional cerebral blood volume measured by dynamic susceptibility contrast MR imaging in alzheimer's disease: A principal components analysis , 1997, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[22]  R. Knab,et al.  Cerebral Blood Flow Predicts Lesion Growth in Acute Stroke Patients , 2002, Stroke.

[23]  V. Runge,et al.  Repeat cerebral blood volume assessment with first‐pass MR imaging , 1994, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[24]  R R Edelman,et al.  Cerebral blood flow: assessment with dynamic contrast-enhanced T2*-weighted MR imaging at 1.5 T. , 1990, Radiology.

[25]  P. Stanzione,et al.  Perfusion-weighted dynamic susceptibility (DSC) MRI: basal ganglia hemodynamic changes after apomorphine in Parkinson's disease , 2002, Neurological Sciences.

[26]  C. Truwit,et al.  Perfusion MR neuroimaging in patients undergoing balloon test occlusion of the internal carotid artery. , 2001, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[27]  A. Sorensen,et al.  Comparison of permeability in high-grade and low-grade brain tumors using dynamic susceptibility contrast MR imaging. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[28]  A. Sorensen,et al.  Do highly concentrated gadolinium chelates improve MR brain perfusion imaging? Intraindividually controlled randomized crossover concentration comparison study of 0.5 versus 1.0 mol/L gadobutrol. , 2003, Radiology.

[29]  S. Heiland,et al.  Funktionelle MR-Verfahren in der Diagnostik intraaxialer Hirntumoren: Perfusions- und Diffusions-Bildgebung , 2002 .

[30]  M. Schnall,et al.  Comparison of quantitative perfusion imaging using arterial spin labeling at 1.5 and 4.0 Tesla , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[31]  M. Viergever,et al.  Correcting partial volume artifacts of the arterial input function in quantitative cerebral perfusion MRI , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[32]  D. Weinberger,et al.  Three-dimensional "BURST" functional magnetic resonance imaging: initial clinical applications. , 1996, Academic radiology.

[33]  K. Sartor,et al.  MR imaging of the brain: tumors , 1999, European Radiology.

[34]  S. Heiland,et al.  Perfusions-MRT bei gestörter Blut-Hirn-Schranke: Fehlerquellen und Lösungsansätze , 2000 .

[35]  M. Viergever,et al.  Repeated quantitative perfusion and contrast permeability measurement in the MRI examination of a CNS tumor , 2000, European Radiology.

[36]  J. Petrella,et al.  Rapid three-dimensional MR imaging method for tracking a bolus of contrast agent through the brain. , 2000, Radiology.

[37]  J. Duyn,et al.  A. functional MRI technique combining principles of echo‐shifting with a train of observations (PRESTO) , 1993, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[38]  C. Weiller,et al.  Predictors of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Normalization in Stroke Patients , 2004, Stroke.

[39]  B. Rosen,et al.  MR Contrast Due to Microscopically Heterogeneous Magnetic Susceptibility: Numerical Simulations and Applications to Cerebral Physiology , 1991, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[40]  Frauke Zipp,et al.  Changes in cerebral perfusion precede plaque formation in multiple sclerosis: a longitudinal perfusion MRI study. , 2004, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[41]  H. Urbach,et al.  Perfusion and molecular diffusion-weighted MR imaging of the brain: In vivo assessment of tissue alteration in cerebral ischemia , 2002, Amino Acids.

[42]  Robert R. Edelman,et al.  Clinical Correlations of Diffusion and Perfusion Lesion Volumes in Acute Ischemic Stroke , 2000, Cerebrovascular Diseases.

[43]  Eun Ja Lee,et al.  Perfusion MR Imaging in Gliomas: Comparison with Histologic Tumor Grade , 2001, Korean journal of radiology.

[44]  C. Zimmer,et al.  Quantification of blood flow in brain tumors: comparison of arterial spin labeling and dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced MR imaging. , 2003, Radiology.

[45]  T. Benner,et al.  Perfusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in patients with carotid artery disease before and after carotid endarterectomy. , 2001, Journal of vascular surgery.

[46]  MR-imaging of non-Alzheimer's dementia. , 1996, Journal of neural transmission. Supplementum.

[47]  M. A. Jacobs,et al.  Perfusion-weighted MRI as a marker of response to treatment in acute and subacute stroke , 2004, Neuroradiology.

[48]  T Kubota,et al.  Tumor vascularity in the brain: evaluation with dynamic susceptibility-contrast MR imaging. , 1993, Radiology.

[49]  R. Floris,et al.  Diffusion and perfusion MR imaging in cases of Alzheimer's disease: correlations with cortical atrophy and lesion load. , 2001, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.