What is the variability in shoulder, axillae and waist position in a group of adolescents?

The clinical assessment of scoliosis is based on the recognition of asymmetry. It is not clear what the degree of asymmetry is in a population without scoliosis, which could make the differentiation between abnormal and normal uncertain. This study defines the range of normality in certain parameters of torso shape that are also associated with the clinical assessment of scoliosis. This was done by analysing the surface topography of a group of 195 children serially measured over a 5‐year period. The analysis considered both the spinal curvature and the relative position of shoulders, axillae and waist on each side. The bivariate relationships were examined using 95% confidence interval data ellipses. Our results showed that a degree of spinal curvature was seen, either as a main thoracic or main thoracolumbar curve. The distribution of the data about a mean point is illustrated by 95% confidence interval (CI) data ellipses with shoulder, axilla and waist data plotted against spinal curvature. The mean values were close to zero (exact symmetry) for all of the measured parameters, with the ellipses showing little differences in the distributions. We conclude that mild asymmetry of the measured torso parameters is normal. These results define what is normal and beyond what point asymmetry becomes abnormal. This information is of use for those managing and counselling patients with scoliosis both before and after surgery.

[1]  M. Głowacki,et al.  Assessment of spinal appearance in female patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated operatively , 2011, Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research.

[2]  K. Tallroth,et al.  Trunk Asymmetry and Scoliosis Anthropometric Measurements in Prepuberal School Children , 1989, Acta paediatrica Scandinavica.

[3]  J. Street,et al.  Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A New Classification to Determine Extent of Spinal Arthrodesis * , 2018, 50 Landmark Papers.

[4]  J. Fox,et al.  Elliptical Insights: Understanding Statistical Methods through Elliptical Geometry , 2013, 1302.4881.

[5]  Georgios Triantafyllopoulos,et al.  Study of trunk asymmetry in normal children and adolescents , 2006, Scoliosis.

[6]  M. Heliövaara,et al.  Development of trunk asymmetry in a cohort of children ages 11 to 22 years. , 2000, Spine.

[7]  R. Verdonk,et al.  Trunk Asymmetries in a Belgian School Population , 1982, Spine.

[8]  Ming Li,et al.  Changes in Life Satisfaction and Self-esteem in Patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis With and Without Surgical Intervention , 2011, Spine.

[9]  S. Willner Development of Trunk Asymmetries and Structural Scoliosis in Prepuberal School Children in Malmö: Follow‐up Study of Children 10–14 Years of Age , 1984, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[10]  M. Ylikoski,et al.  Trunk asymmetry and screening for scoliosis: a longitudinal cohort study of pubertal schoolchildren , 1993, Acta paediatrica.

[11]  R J Jefferson,et al.  Quantifying the cosmetic defect of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. , 1993, Spine.

[12]  Sanford Weisberg,et al.  An R Companion to Applied Regression , 2010 .

[13]  C. A. Giglio,et al.  Development and evaluation of thoracic kyphosis and lumbar lordosis during growth , 2007, Journal of children's orthopaedics.

[14]  John Hutchinson,et al.  Association Between Components of Body Composition and Scoliosis: A Prospective Cohort Study Reporting Differences Identifiable Before the Onset of Scoliosis , 2014, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[15]  L. Carreon,et al.  Incidence of cancer in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients treated 25 years previously , 2016, European Spine Journal.

[16]  Stefano Negrini,et al.  TRACE (Trunk Aesthetic Clinical Evaluation), a routine clinical tool to evaluate aesthetics in scoliosis patients: development from the Aesthetic Index (AI) and repeatability , 2009, Scoliosis.

[17]  Martin Law,et al.  Cumulative radiation exposure and associated cancer risk estimates for scoliosis patients: Impact of repetitive full spine radiography. , 2016, European journal of radiology.

[18]  Fiona Berryman,et al.  A new system for measuring three-dimensional back shape in scoliosis , 2008, European Spine Journal.

[19]  P. Katzmarzyk,et al.  Effect of the site of measurement of waist circumference on the prevalence of the metabolic syndrome. , 2009, The American journal of cardiology.

[20]  Daisy Veitch,et al.  Where is the human waist? Definitions, manual compared toscanner measurements. , 2012, Work.

[21]  R J Jefferson,et al.  A method for analysis of back shape in scoliosis. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[22]  John E Lonstein,et al.  How Much Correction Is Enough? , 2007, Spine.

[23]  James O Sanders,et al.  The Spinal Appearance Questionnaire: Results of Reliability, Validity, and Responsiveness Testing in Patients With Idiopathic Scoliosis , 2007, Spine.

[24]  F. Pellisé,et al.  Validity and reliability of photographic measures to evaluate waistline asymmetry in idiopathic scoliosis , 2016, European Spine Journal.

[25]  Mutlu Hayran,et al.  Evaluation of shoulder balance in the normal adolescent population and its correlation with radiological parameters , 2008, European Spine Journal.

[26]  J. Cheng,et al.  How Well Does Radiological Measurements Correlate With Cosmetic Indices in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis With Lenke 5, 6 Curve Types? , 2010, Spine.

[27]  Derek Stephens,et al.  Surgeon Reliability in Rating Physical Deformity in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis , 2007, Spine.

[28]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[29]  Cobb,et al.  Outlines for the study of scoliosis , 1948 .

[30]  M. T. Restivo,et al.  Anatomical location for waist circumference measurement in older adults: a preliminary study. , 2012, Nutricion hospitalaria.

[31]  P. Pynsent,et al.  Influence of Cobb Angle and ISIS2 Surface Topography Volumetric Asymmetry on Scoliosis Research Society-22 Outcome Scores in Scoliosis. , 2013, Spine deformity.