Evaluation of crates and girth tethers for sows: reproductive performance, immunity, behavior and ergonomic measures

Abstract An evaluation of reproductive performance, behavior, immunity and ergonomics was conducted for two common sow housing systems: the girth tether and crate. Littermate Yorkshire×Landrace gilts were randomly assigned to either the crate or girth tether system and they remained in that treatment for two consecutive pregnancies and lactations. A total of 171 matings resulted in 141 litters (82.4% farrowing rate). Second parity sows penned in girth tethers had 1.5 fewer piglets born and 1.3 fewer piglets weaned than sows in the crate system ( P P P P P

[1]  I. Clarke,et al.  Stress and Reproduction in Farm-Animals , 1992 .

[2]  P. R. Wiepkema,et al.  Behaviour and abomasal damage in individual veal calves , 1987 .

[3]  G. Cronin,et al.  The Effects of Genotype on Physiological and Behavioural Responses Related to the Welfare of Pregnant Pigs , 1988 .

[4]  R. I. Nicholson,et al.  Shipping stress and social status effects on pig performance, plasma cortisol, natural killer cell activity, and leukocyte numbers. , 1993, Journal of animal science.

[5]  G. Backus,et al.  Evaluation of housing systems for sows. , 1993, Journal of animal science.

[6]  T. Friend,et al.  Effect of confinement method on physiology and production of gestating gilts. , 1988, Journal of animal science.

[7]  R. Dantzer,et al.  Behavioral, physiological and functional aspects of stereotyped behavior: a review and a re-interpretation. , 1986, Journal of animal science.

[8]  John J. McGlone,et al.  A description of micro- and mainframe-computer programs to summarize frequency, duration and sequences of behavior , 1985 .

[9]  Paul H. Hemsworth,et al.  The effects of pregnancy and parity number on behavioural and physiological responses related to the welfare status of individual and group-housed pigs , 1987 .

[10]  J. McGlone,et al.  A 51Cr Release Assay for the Determination of Natural Killer Cell Cytotoxicity , 1992 .

[11]  A. H. Jensen,et al.  Ergonomic Evaluation of Catching and Removing Piglets from Farrowing Units Having Different Sow Crates , 1989 .

[12]  P. Hemsworth,et al.  The Effects of Design of Individual Stalls on the Social Behaviour and Physiological Responses Related to the Welfare of Pregnant Pigs , 1987 .

[13]  J. McGlone.  What is animal welfare , 1993 .

[14]  Paul H. Hemsworth,et al.  THE EFFECT OF INDIVIDUAL AND GROUP HOUSING ON BEHAVIOURAL AND PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSES RELATED TO THE WELFARE OF PREGNANT PIGS , 1985 .

[15]  A. H. Jensen,et al.  Effects of space restriction and management on pre- and post-puberal response of female swine. , 1970 .

[16]  J. Deshazer,et al.  Cortisol response of gilts in tether stalls. , 1985, Journal of animal science.

[17]  P. R. Wiepkema,et al.  Endogenous opioids are involved in abnormal stereotyped behaviours of tethered sows , 1985, Neuropeptides.

[18]  G. Trinchieri,et al.  Biology of Natural Killer Cells , 1989, Advances in Immunology.

[19]  G. Cronin,et al.  Effects of design of individual cage-stalls on the behavioural and physiological responses related to the welfare of pregnant pigs , 1991 .