Perceived Importance of Information: The Effects of Mentioning Information, Shared Information Bias, Ownership Bias, Reiteration, and Confirmation Bias

Participants were given information for and against the decriminalization of marijuana and discussed the issue in groups. Factors affecting rated importance of information after the group discussion were examined. Participants did not rate information that was mentioned during the discussion as more important than information not mentioned, and participants did not rate shared information they mentioned as more important than unshared information. Participants did rate shared information other group members mentioned as more important than unshared information others mentioned. Participants did not rate their own information as more important than other's information, and information that was repeated was not rated as more important. Participants did perceive information supporting their individual position as more important than information against their position, and this confirmation bias was lessened in groups containing an opinion minority. A comparison of minority and majority members in minority-containing groups found that minority members were more open to information than majority members.

[1]  A. Hollingshead.  The Rank-Order Effect in Group Decision Making , 1996 .

[2]  J. A. Sniezek,et al.  Factors that May Affect the Difficulty of Uncovering Hidden Profiles , 2003 .

[3]  D. D. Stewart,et al.  Stereotypes, Negativity Bias, and the Discussion of Unshared Information in Decision-Making Groups , 1998 .

[4]  Aaron M. Brower,et al.  What's Social about Social Cognition?: Research on Socially Shared Cognition in Small Groups , 1996 .

[5]  Yaniv,et al.  Advice Taking in Decision Making: Egocentric Discounting and Reputation Formation. , 2000, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[6]  Thomas C. Toppino,et al.  Frequency and the Conference of Referential Validity. , 1977 .

[7]  G. Stasser,et al.  Expert Roles and Information Exchange during Discussion: The Importance of Knowing Who Knows What , 1995 .

[8]  John D. Rogers,et al.  Dissent and the search for information. , 1996 .

[9]  R. Tindale,et al.  ‘Social Sharedness’ as a Unifying Theme for Information Processing in Groups , 2000 .

[10]  Anthony S. Bryk,et al.  Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods , 1992 .

[11]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Anomalies: The Endowment Effect, Loss Aversion, and Status Quo Bias , 1991 .

[12]  Franklin J. Boster,et al.  The Impact of Group Size and Proportion of Shared Information on the Exchange and Integration of Information in Groups , 1997 .

[13]  John B. Nezlek,et al.  Multilevel Random Coefficient Analyses of Event- and Interval-Contingent Data in Social and Personality Psychology Research , 2001 .

[14]  M. L. Klotz,et al.  Personal contact, individuation, and the better-than-average effect. , 1995 .

[15]  S. Schulz-Hardt,et al.  The dissemination of critical, unshared information in decision-making groups: the effects of pre-discussion dissent , 2002 .

[16]  L. Boehm,et al.  The Validity Effect: A Search for Mediating Variables , 1994 .

[17]  A. Van Hiel,et al.  Effects of Partially Shared Information and Awareness of Unshared Information on Information Sampling , 1996 .

[18]  G. Stasser,et al.  Expert role assignment and information sampling during collective recall and decision making. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[19]  Dieter Frey,et al.  Recent Research on Selective Exposure to Information , 1986, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology.

[20]  J. R. Larson,et al.  Discussion of shared and unshared information in decision-making groups , 1994 .

[21]  G. Stasser,et al.  Information sampling in structured and unstructured discussions of three- and six-person groups. , 1989 .

[22]  Dale E. Brashers,et al.  Majority‐minority influence: identifying argumentative patterns and predicting argument‐outcome links , 2000 .

[23]  G. M. Wittenbaum,et al.  Mutual enhancement: Toward an understanding of the collective preference for shared information , 1999 .

[24]  L. Ross,et al.  Biased Assimilation and Attitude Polarization: The Effects of Prior Theories on Subsequently Considered Evidence , 1979 .

[25]  David Dryden Henningsen,et al.  Examining Social Influence in Information-Sharing Contexts , 2003 .

[26]  S. Schulz-Hardt,et al.  Productive conflict in group decision making: genuine and contrived dissent as strategies to counteract biased information seeking☆ , 2002 .

[27]  L Hasher,et al.  Automatic processing of fundamental information: the case of frequency of occurrence. , 1984, The American psychologist.

[28]  Deborah H. Gruenfeld,et al.  Group Composition and Decision Making: How Member Familiarity and Information Distribution Affect Process and Performance , 1996 .

[29]  Gwen M. Wittenbaum,et al.  Information Sampling in Decision-Making Groups , 1998 .

[30]  G. Stasser,et al.  Discovery of hidden profiles by decision-making groups: Solving a problem versus making a judgment. , 1992 .

[31]  Alain Van Hiel,et al.  Information Exchange in Context: Effects of Gender Composition of Group, Accountability, and Intergroup Perception on Group Decision Making1 , 1998 .

[32]  Tobias Greitemeyer,et al.  Preference-consistent evaluation of information in the hidden profile paradigm: beyond group-level explanations for the dominance of shared information in group decisions. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[33]  Reid Hastie,et al.  The impact of information on small group choice. , 1997 .

[34]  Margaret G. Meloy,et al.  The Distortion of Information during Decisions , 1996 .

[35]  H. Guetzkow.  Unitizing and categorizing problems in coding qualitative data , 1950 .

[36]  A. Dennis.  Information Exchange and Use in Small Group Decision Making , 1996 .

[37]  J. R. Larson,et al.  Diagnosing groups: charting the flow of information in medical decision-making teams. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[38]  Jonathan M. Bowman,et al.  A social validation explanation for mutual enhancement. , 2004 .

[39]  C. Nemeth.  Differential contributions of majority and minority influence , 1986 .

[40]  K. Propp.  Information Utilization in Small Group Decision Making , 1997 .

[41]  J. R. Larson,et al.  Leadership Style and the Discussion of Shared and Unshared Information in Decision-Making Groups , 1998 .

[42]  Janet A. Sniezek,et al.  Information Sampling and Confidence Within Groups and Judge Advisor Systems , 2001, Commun. Res..

[43]  C. Dreu,et al.  Differential processing and attitude change following majority versus minority arguments , 1996 .

[44]  Some practical judgment and decision-making research. , 1993 .

[45]  Edmund A. Mennis.  The Wisdom of Crowds: Why the Many Are Smarter than the Few and How Collective Wisdom Shapes Business, Economies, Societies, and Nations , 2006 .

[46]  Serge Moscovici,et al.  Toward A Theory of Conversion Behavior , 1980 .

[47]  G. Stasser,et al.  Effects of information load and percentage of shared information on the dissemination of unshared information during group discussion. , 1987 .

[48]  R. Hastie,et al.  The common knowledge effect: Information sharing and group judgment. , 1993 .

[49]  A. Hollingshead.  Information Suppression and Status Persistence in Group Decision Making The Effects of Communication Media , 1996 .

[50]  Gwen M. Wittenbaum,et al.  Management of information in small groups. , 1996 .

[51]  S. Moscovici,et al.  Biased information search in group decision making. , 2000, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.

[52]  Craig D. Parks,et al.  Acceptance of Uncommon Information into Group Discussion When That Information Is or Is Not Demonstrable , 1996 .

[53]  R. Hertwig,et al.  The Reiteration Effect in Hindsight Bias , 1997 .

[54]  T. Postmes,et al.  Quality of decision making and group norms. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[55]  Lynn Hasher,et al.  The Processing of Frequency Information: An Automatic Mechanism?. , 1977 .

[56]  Lynn Hasher,et al.  Automatic encoding of category size information. , 1980 .

[57]  Robert S. Billings,et al.  Accountability and the discussion of unshared, critical information in decision-making groups. , 1998 .

[58]  G. Stasser,et al.  Pooling of Unshared Information in Group Decision Making: Biased Information Sampling During Discussion , 1985 .