Understanding Pharmaceutical Quality by Design

This review further clarifies the concept of pharmaceutical quality by design (QbD) and describes its objectives. QbD elements include the following: (1) a quality target product profile (QTPP) that identifies the critical quality attributes (CQAs) of the drug product; (2) product design and understanding including identification of critical material attributes (CMAs); (3) process design and understanding including identification of critical process parameters (CPPs), linking CMAs and CPPs to CQAs; (4) a control strategy that includes specifications for the drug substance(s), excipient(s), and drug product as well as controls for each step of the manufacturing process; and (5) process capability and continual improvement. QbD tools and studies include prior knowledge, risk assessment, mechanistic models, design of experiments (DoE) and data analysis, and process analytical technology (PAT). As the pharmaceutical industry moves toward the implementation of pharmaceutical QbD, a common terminology, understanding of concepts and expectations are necessary. This understanding will facilitate better communication between those involved in risk-based drug development and drug application review.

[1]  M. Khan,et al.  Quality by design: understanding the formulation variables of a cyclosporine A self-nanoemulsified drug delivery systems by Box-Behnken design and desirability function. , 2007, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[2]  Lawrence X. Yu,et al.  Pharmaceutical Equivalence by Design for Generic Drugs: Modified-Release Products , 2011, Pharmaceutical Research.

[3]  Joseph Moses Juran,et al.  Juran Institute's Six Sigma Breakthrough and Beyond , 2004 .

[4]  Michael Glodek,et al.  Process Robustness - A PQRI White Paper , 2006 .

[5]  H. Wu,et al.  Quality-by-Design (QbD): An integrated process analytical technology (PAT) approach for a dynamic pharmaceutical co-precipitation process characterization and process design space development. , 2011, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[6]  Andre Raw,et al.  Quality by Design: Concepts for ANDAs , 2008, The AAPS Journal.

[7]  A. Rathore,et al.  Quality by design for biopharmaceuticals , 2009, Nature Biotechnology.

[8]  Guidance for Industry PAT — A Framework for Innovative Pharmaceutical Development , Manufacturing , and Quality Assurance , 2004 .

[9]  Ergun Karaagaoglu,et al.  Development and evaluation of paclitaxel nanoparticles using a quality-by-design approach. , 2013, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[10]  Gerhard Jentzsch,et al.  Working group on , 1991 .

[11]  H. Wu,et al.  Quality-by-design (QbD): an integrated approach for evaluation of powder blending process kinetics and determination of powder blending end-point. , 2009, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[12]  Akhtar Siddiqui,et al.  Focused beam reflectance measurement to monitor nimodipine precipitation process. , 2013, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[13]  Ziyaur Rahman,et al.  Hunter screening design to understand the product variability of solid dispersion formulation of a peptide antibiotic. , 2013, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[14]  Lawrence X. Yu,et al.  Applications of process analytical technology to crystallization processes. , 2004, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[15]  M. Khan,et al.  Characterization of a nonribosomal peptide antibiotic solid dispersion formulation by process analytical technologies sensors. , 2013, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[16]  Diane J Burgess,et al.  A quality by design (QbD) case study on liposomes containing hydrophilic API: II. Screening of critical variables, and establishment of design space at laboratory scale. , 2012, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[17]  Lawrence X. Yu Pharmaceutical Quality by Design: Product and Process Development, Understanding, and Control , 2008, Pharmaceutical Research.

[18]  M. Khan,et al.  Optimization of a self-nanoemulsified tablet dosage form of Ubiquinone using response surface methodology: effect of formulation ingredients. , 2002, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[19]  H. Wu,et al.  Quality-by-design: an integrated process analytical technology approach to determine the nucleation and growth mechanisms during a dynamic pharmaceutical coprecipitation process. , 2011, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[20]  Michael Levin,et al.  Supac-Mr: Modified Release Solid Oral Dosage Forms‚ÄîScale-Up and Postapproval Changes: Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls; In Vitro Dissolution Testing and In Vivo Bioequivalence Documentation , 2001 .

[21]  Joseph Moses Juran Juran on Quality by Design: The New Steps for Planning Quality into Goods and Services , 1992 .

[22]  Ziyaur Rahman,et al.  Assessing the impact of nimodipine devitrification in the ternary cosolvent system through quality by design approach. , 2013, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[23]  Ziyaur Rahman,et al.  Orally disintegrating tablet of novel salt of antiepileptic drug: formulation strategy and evaluation. , 2013, European journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics : official journal of Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Pharmazeutische Verfahrenstechnik e.V.

[24]  M. Khan,et al.  Quality by design: impact of formulation variables and their interactions on quality attributes of a lyophilized monoclonal antibody. , 2012, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[25]  Huiquan Wu,et al.  Quality-by-design (QbD): an integrated multivariate approach for the component quantification in powder blends. , 2009, International journal of pharmaceutics.