Evaluation of confound regression strategies for the mitigation of micromovement artifact in studies of dynamic resting-state functional connectivity and multilayer network modularity

Dynamic functional connectivity reflects the spatiotemporal organization of spontaneous brain activity in health and disease. Dynamic functional connectivity may be susceptible to artifacts induced by participant motion. This report provides a systematic evaluation of 12 commonly used participant-level confound regression strategies designed to mitigate the effects of micromovements in a sample of 393 youths (ages 8–22 years). Each strategy was evaluated according to a number of benchmarks, including (a) the residual association between participant motion and edge dispersion, (b) distance-dependent effects of motion on edge dispersion, (c) the degree to which functional subnetworks could be identified by multilayer modularity maximization, and (d) measures of module reconfiguration, including node flexibility and node promiscuity. Results indicate variability in the effectiveness of the evaluated pipelines across benchmarks. Methods that included global signal regression were the most consistently effective de-noising strategies. Author Summary Dynamic functional connectivity reflects the spatiotemporal organization of spontaneous brain activity in health and disease, but it can be susceptible to motion artifacts. Here we provide a systematic evaluation of 12 commonly used participant-level confound regression strategies designed to mitigate the effects of micromovements in a sample of 393 youths (ages 8–22 years). Each strategy was evaluated according to the residual association between participant motion and edge dispersion, distance-dependent effects of motion on edge dispersion, the degree to which functional subnetworks could be identified by multilayer modularity maximization, and measures of module reconfiguration, including node flexibility and node promiscuity. Results indicate variability in the effectiveness of the evaluated pipelines across benchmarks. Methods that included global signal regression were the most consistently effective de-noising strategies.

[1]  H. Hakonarson,et al.  Incidental Findings in Youths Volunteering for Brain MRI Research , 2013, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[2]  Danielle S. Bassett,et al.  Cognitive Network Neuroscience , 2015, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[3]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Movement‐Related effects in fMRI time‐series , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[4]  Hang Joon Jo,et al.  The perils of global signal regression for group comparisons: a case study of Autism Spectrum Disorders , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[5]  Li Yao,et al.  The dynamic characteristics of the anterior cingulate cortex in resting-state fMRI of patients with depression. , 2018, Journal of affective disorders.

[6]  J. H. Steiger.  Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix. , 1980 .

[7]  Jonathan D. Power,et al.  Recent progress and outstanding issues in motion correction in resting state fMRI , 2015, NeuroImage.

[8]  Danielle S Bassett,et al.  Learning-induced autonomy of sensorimotor systems , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.

[9]  Eswar Damaraju,et al.  Tracking whole-brain connectivity dynamics in the resting state. , 2014, Cerebral cortex.

[10]  Timothy O. Laumann,et al.  Data Quality Influences Observed Links Between Functional Connectivity and Behavior , 2017, Cerebral cortex.

[11]  Mark A. Elliott,et al.  Impact of in-scanner head motion on multiple measures of functional connectivity: Relevance for studies of neurodevelopment in youth , 2012, NeuroImage.

[12]  Christos Davatzikos,et al.  Benchmarking of participant-level confound regression strategies for the control of motion artifact in studies of functional connectivity , 2017, NeuroImage.

[13]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Temporally-independent functional modes of spontaneous brain activity , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  Mark A. Elliott,et al.  The Philadelphia Neurodevelopmental Cohort: A publicly available resource for the study of normal and abnormal brain development in youth , 2016, NeuroImage.

[15]  Janet Elizabeth Hope.  Open Source , 2017, Encyclopedia of GIS.

[16]  Danielle S Bassett,et al.  Brain graphs: graphical models of the human brain connectome. , 2011, Annual review of clinical psychology.

[17]  Denise C. Park,et al.  Decreased segregation of brain systems across the healthy adult lifespan , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  J. Duyn,et al.  Time-varying functional network information extracted from brief instances of spontaneous brain activity , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  Mert R. Sabuncu,et al.  The influence of head motion on intrinsic functional connectivity MRI , 2012, NeuroImage.

[20]  O. Sporns,et al.  Network neuroscience , 2017, Nature Neuroscience.

[21]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Cerebral cartography and connectomics , 2015, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[22]  Kevin Murphy,et al.  Towards a consensus regarding global signal regression for resting state functional connectivity MRI , 2017, NeuroImage.

[23]  Edward T. Bullmore,et al.  On the use of correlation as a measure of network connectivity , 2012, NeuroImage.

[24]  Jessica R. Cohen.  The behavioral and cognitive relevance of time-varying, dynamic changes in functional connectivity , 2017, NeuroImage.

[25]  Kevin Murphy,et al.  Resting-state fMRI confounds and cleanup , 2013, NeuroImage.

[26]  Beatriz Luna,et al.  The nuisance of nuisance regression: Spectral misspecification in a common approach to resting-state fMRI preprocessing reintroduces noise and obscures functional connectivity , 2013, NeuroImage.

[27]  Evan M. Gordon,et al.  On the Stability of BOLD fMRI Correlations , 2016, Cerebral cortex.

[28]  Alberto Llera,et al.  ICA-AROMA: A robust ICA-based strategy for removing motion artifacts from fMRI data , 2015, NeuroImage.

[29]  Mason A. Porter,et al.  Robust Detection of Dynamic Community Structure in Networks , 2012, Chaos.

[30]  Danielle S. Bassett,et al.  Modeling and interpreting mesoscale network dynamics , 2017, NeuroImage.

[31]  Ben D. Fulcher,et al.  An evaluation of the efficacy, reliability, and sensitivity of motion correction strategies for resting-state functional MRI , 2017 .

[32]  Martin A. Lindquist,et al.  Dynamic connectivity regression: Determining state-related changes in brain connectivity , 2012, NeuroImage.

[33]  Arno Klein,et al.  Evaluation of 14 nonlinear deformation algorithms applied to human brain MRI registration , 2009, NeuroImage.

[34]  G. Deco,et al.  Dynamic functional connectivity reveals altered variability in functional connectivity among patients with major depressive disorder , 2016, Human brain mapping.

[35]  Yu Cao,et al.  Multi-atlas Segmentation with Learning-Based Label Fusion , 2014, MLMI.

[36]  Hang Joon Jo,et al.  Trouble at Rest: How Correlation Patterns and Group Differences Become Distorted After Global Signal Regression , 2012, Brain Connect..

[37]  Christos Davatzikos,et al.  Heterogeneous impact of motion on fundamental patterns of developmental changes in functional connectivity during youth , 2013, NeuroImage.

[38]  Lena S. Geiger,et al.  Dynamic brain network reconfiguration as a potential schizophrenia genetic risk mechanism modulated by NMDA receptor function , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[39]  M. V. D. Heuvel,et al.  Exploring the brain network: A review on resting-state fMRI functional connectivity , 2010, European Neuropsychopharmacology.

[40]  Timothy O. Laumann,et al.  Functional Network Organization of the Human Brain , 2011, Neuron.

[41]  Danielle S. Bassett,et al.  Choosing Wavelet Methods, Filters, and Lengths for Functional Brain Network Construction , 2015, PloS one.

[42]  Birk Diedenhofen,et al.  cocor: A Comprehensive Solution for the Statistical Comparison of Correlations , 2015, PloS one.

[43]  Eswar Damaraju,et al.  The effect of preprocessing in dynamic functional network connectivity used to classify mild traumatic brain injury , 2017, Brain and behavior.

[44]  Danielle S Bassett,et al.  Evolution of network architecture in a granular material under compression. , 2016, Physical review. E.

[45]  A. Belger,et al.  Dynamic functional connectivity analysis reveals transient states of dysconnectivity in schizophrenia , 2014, NeuroImage: Clinical.

[46]  M. Schölvinck,et al.  Neural basis of global resting-state fMRI activity , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[47]  César Caballero-Gaudes,et al.  Methods for cleaning the BOLD fMRI signal , 2016, NeuroImage.

[48]  P. DeRosse,et al.  Dynamic Functional Connectivity States Reflecting Psychotic-like Experiences. , 2017, Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging.

[49]  Ewald Moser,et al.  On the origin of respiratory artifacts in BOLD-EPI of the human brain. , 2002, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[50]  Timothy O. Laumann,et al.  Generation and Evaluation of a Cortical Area Parcellation from Resting-State Correlations. , 2016, Cerebral cortex.

[51]  Timothy O. Laumann,et al.  Sources and implications of whole-brain fMRI signals in humans , 2017, NeuroImage.

[52]  Bharat B. Biswal,et al.  Resting state fMRI: A personal history , 2012, NeuroImage.

[53]  A. Mackey,et al.  Resting-State fMRI , 2014, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[54]  V. Calhoun,et al.  The Chronnectome: Time-Varying Connectivity Networks as the Next Frontier in fMRI Data Discovery , 2014, Neuron.

[55]  Andreas Heinz,et al.  Test–retest reliability of resting-state connectivity network characteristics using fMRI and graph theoretical measures , 2012, NeuroImage.

[56]  Kent A. Kiehl,et al.  A method for evaluating dynamic functional network connectivity and task-modulation: application to schizophrenia , 2010, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[57]  Jonathan D. Power,et al.  Functional Brain Networks Develop from a “Local to Distributed” Organization , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[58]  Danielle S Bassett,et al.  Cohesive network reconfiguration accompanies extended training , 2017, Human brain mapping.

[59]  Danielle S Bassett,et al.  Mitigating head motion artifact in functional connectivity MRI , 2018, Nature Protocols.

[60]  Danielle S. Bassett,et al.  Positive affect, surprise, and fatigue are correlates of network flexibility , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[61]  Brian B. Avants,et al.  N4ITK: Improved N3 Bias Correction , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[62]  Edward T. Bullmore,et al.  Neuroinformatics Original Research Article , 2022 .

[63]  Dinggang Shen,et al.  Test-Retest Reliability of “High-Order” Functional Connectivity in Young Healthy Adults , 2017, Front. Neurosci..

[64]  R W Cox,et al.  AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. , 1996, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[65]  Christos Davatzikos,et al.  Neuroimaging of the Philadelphia Neurodevelopmental Cohort , 2014, NeuroImage.

[66]  Kathleen R. Merikangas,et al.  Prevalence and Treatment of Mental Disorders Among US Children in the 2001–2004 NHANES , 2010, Pediatrics.

[67]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[68]  Dimitri Van De Ville,et al.  The dynamic functional connectome: State-of-the-art and perspectives , 2017, NeuroImage.

[69]  R. Poldrack,et al.  Temporal metastates are associated with differential patterns of time-resolved connectivity, network topology, and attention , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[70]  Thomas T. Liu,et al.  A component based noise correction method (CompCor) for BOLD and perfusion based fMRI , 2007, NeuroImage.

[71]  Joaquín Goñi,et al.  Changes in structural and functional connectivity among resting-state networks across the human lifespan , 2014, NeuroImage.

[72]  Mary Beth Nebel,et al.  Reduction of motion-related artifacts in resting state fMRI using aCompCor , 2014, NeuroImage.

[73]  Hang Joon Jo,et al.  Mapping sources of correlation in resting state FMRI, with artifact detection and removal , 2010, NeuroImage.

[74]  Dimitri Van De Ville,et al.  On spurious and real fluctuations of dynamic functional connectivity during rest , 2015, NeuroImage.

[75]  C. Grady,et al.  Age differences in the functional interactions among the default, frontoparietal control, and dorsal attention networks , 2016, Neurobiology of Aging.

[76]  Antonio Napolitano,et al.  Test-retest reliability of graph metrics of resting state MRI functional brain networks: A review , 2015, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[77]  D. Bassett,et al.  Dynamic reconfiguration of frontal brain networks during executive cognition in humans , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[78]  Jukka-Pekka Onnela,et al.  Community Structure in Time-Dependent, Multiscale, and Multiplex Networks , 2009, Science.

[79]  R. Cameron Craddock,et al.  A comprehensive assessment of regional variation in the impact of head micromovements on functional connectomics , 2013, NeuroImage.

[80]  E. Bullmore,et al.  Human brain networks in health and disease , 2009, Current opinion in neurology.

[81]  Danielle S. Bassett,et al.  Brain state expression and transitions are related to complex executive cognition in normative neurodevelopment , 2018, NeuroImage.

[82]  Jonathan D. Power,et al.  Temporal interpolation alters motion in fMRI scans: Magnitudes and consequences for artifact detection , 2017, PloS one.

[83]  Simon B. Eickhoff,et al.  An improved framework for confound regression and filtering for control of motion artifact in the preprocessing of resting-state functional connectivity data , 2013, NeuroImage.

[84]  Simon W. Moore,et al.  Efficient Physical Embedding of Topologically Complex Information Processing Networks in Brains and Computer Circuits , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[85]  J. Morton,et al.  It's a matter of time: Reframing the development of cognitive control as a modification of the brain's temporal dynamics , 2015, Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience.

[86]  B. Biswal,et al.  Dynamic brain functional connectivity modulated by resting-state networks , 2013, Brain Structure and Function.

[87]  Michael Brady,et al.  Improved Optimization for the Robust and Accurate Linear Registration and Motion Correction of Brain Images , 2002, NeuroImage.

[88]  Danielle S. Bassett,et al.  Evolution of brain network dynamics in neurodevelopment , 2017, Network Neuroscience.

[89]  Richard F. Betzel,et al.  Modular Brain Networks. , 2016, Annual review of psychology.

[90]  Abraham Z. Snyder,et al.  Spurious but systematic correlations in functional connectivity MRI networks arise from subject motion , 2012, NeuroImage.

[91]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Revealing modular architecture of human brain structural networks by using cortical thickness from MRI. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[92]  Brian B. Avants,et al.  An Open Source Multivariate Framework for n-Tissue Segmentation with Evaluation on Public Data , 2011, Neuroinformatics.

[93]  J.C. Cheng,et al.  Slow-5 dynamic functional connectivity reflects the capacity to sustain cognitive performance during pain , 2017, NeuroImage.

[94]  Arno Klein,et al.  Large-scale evaluation of ANTs and FreeSurfer cortical thickness measurements , 2014, NeuroImage.

[95]  Arno Klein,et al.  A reproducible evaluation of ANTs similarity metric performance in brain image registration , 2011, NeuroImage.

[96]  Ben D. Fulcher,et al.  An evaluation of the efficacy, reliability, and sensitivity of motion correction strategies for resting-state functional MRI , 2017, NeuroImage.

[97]  David A. Leopold,et al.  Dynamic functional connectivity: Promise, issues, and interpretations , 2013, NeuroImage.

[98]  Danielle S Bassett,et al.  Motion artifact in studies of functional connectivity: Characteristics and mitigation strategies , 2019, Human brain mapping.

[99]  Bruce Fischl,et al.  Accurate and robust brain image alignment using boundary-based registration , 2009, NeuroImage.

[100]  Swathi P. Iyer,et al.  Distinct neural signatures detected for ADHD subtypes after controlling for micro-movements in resting state functional connectivity MRI data , 2012, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[101]  Ludovica Griffanti,et al.  Automatic denoising of functional MRI data: Combining independent component analysis and hierarchical fusion of classifiers , 2014, NeuroImage.

[102]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Dynamic reconfiguration of human brain networks during learning , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[103]  O. Sporns,et al.  Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems , 2009, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[104]  Z. Yao,et al.  Resting-State Time-Varying Analysis Reveals Aberrant Variations of Functional Connectivity in Autism , 2016, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[105]  B. T. Thomas Yeo,et al.  Interpreting temporal fluctuations in resting-state functional connectivity MRI , 2017, NeuroImage.

[106]  Andreas A Ioannides,et al.  Dynamic functional connectivity , 2007, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[107]  Aaron Kucyi,et al.  Dynamic functional connectivity of the default mode network tracks daydreaming , 2014, NeuroImage.

[108]  Danielle S. Bassett,et al.  Dynamic graph metrics: Tutorial, toolbox, and tale , 2017, NeuroImage.

[109]  Sarah Feldt Muldoon,et al.  Network and Multilayer Network Approaches to Understanding Human Brain Dynamics , 2016, Philosophy of Science.