Generation and Implementation of a Patient-Centered and Patient-Facing Genomic Test Report in the EHR

Context: Communication of genetic laboratory results to patients and providers is impeded by the complexity of results and reports. This can lead to misinterpretation of results, causing inappropriate care. Patients often do not receive a copy of the report leading to possible miscommunication. To address these problems, we conducted patient-centered research to inform design of interpretive reports. Here we describe the development and deployment of a specific patient-centered clinical decision support (CDS) tool, a multi-use patient-centered genomic test report (PGR) that interfaces with an electronic health record (EHR). Implementation Process: A PGR with a companion provider report was configured for implementation within the EHR using locally developed software (COMPASS™) to manage secure data exchange and access. Findings: We conducted semi-structured interviews with patients, family members, and clinicians that showed they sought clear information addressing findings, family implications, resources, prognosis and next steps relative to the genomic result. Providers requested access to applicable, available clinical guidelines. Initial results indicated patients and providers found the PGR contained helpful, valuable information and would provide a basis for result-related conversation between patients, providers and family. Major Themes: Direct patient involvement in the design and development of a PGR identified format and presentation preferences, and delivery of relevant information to patients and providers, prompting the creation of a CDS tool. Conclusions: Research and development of patient-centered CDS tools designed to support improved patient outcomes, are enhanced by early and substantial engagement of patients in contributing to all phases of tool design and development.

[1]  Gillian D Sanders,et al.  Enabling health care decisionmaking through clinical decision support and knowledge management. , 2012, Evidence report/technology assessment.

[2]  Lynn Feldman,et al.  Enhancing genomic laboratory reports from the patients' view: A qualitative analysis , 2015, American journal of medical genetics. Part A.

[3]  M. McMullan Patients using the Internet to obtain health information: how this affects the patient-health professional relationship. , 2006, Patient education and counseling.

[4]  Deb Feldman-Stewart,et al.  Validation of a Decision Regret Scale , 2003, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[5]  I. Lipkus,et al.  Developing patient-friendly genetic and genomic test reports: formats to promote patient engagement and understanding , 2014, Genome Medicine.

[6]  Dan M. Roden,et al.  Implementing genomic medicine in the clinic: the future is here , 2013, Genetics in Medicine.

[7]  Joann G Elmore,et al.  Inviting Patients to Read Their Doctors' Notes: A Quasi-experimental Study and a Look Ahead , 2011, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[8]  B. Miller,et al.  Improving Diagnosis in Health Care. , 2016, Military medicine.

[9]  Susan S. Woods,et al.  Promise of and potential for patient-facing technologies to enable meaningful use. , 2011, American journal of preventive medicine.

[10]  Daniel Nilsson,et al.  An international effort towards developing standards for best practices in analysis, interpretation and reporting of clinical genome sequencing results in the CLARITY Challenge , 2014, Genome Biology.

[11]  Marylyn D. Ritchie,et al.  Distribution and clinical impact of functional variants in 50,726 whole-exome sequences from the DiscovEHR study , 2016, Science.

[12]  Mary E Duffy,et al.  Design and psychometric evaluation of the Psychological Adaptation to Genetic Information Scale. , 2005, Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing.

[13]  Mark A. Hoffman,et al.  Electronic medical records and personalized medicine , 2011, Human Genetics.

[14]  Eliezer M. Van Allen,et al.  Interactive or static reports to guide clinical interpretation of cancer genomics , 2018, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[15]  Marc S. Williams,et al.  Enhancing genomic laboratory reports: A qualitative analysis of provider review , 2016, American journal of medical genetics. Part A.

[16]  D. Ledbetter,et al.  The Geisinger MyCode Community Health Initiative: an electronic health record-linked biobank for Precision Medicine research , 2015, Genetics in Medicine.

[17]  W. Chung,et al.  Recommendations for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing, 2016 update (ACMG SF v2.0): a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics , 2016, Genetics in Medicine.

[18]  Gaucher Disease - NORD (National Organization for Rare Disorders) , 2018 .

[19]  Lynn Feldman,et al.  Impact of a Patient-Facing Enhanced Genomic Results Report to Improve Understanding, Engagement, and Communication , 2017, Journal of Genetic Counseling.

[20]  Laney K. Jones,et al.  Developing Pharmacogenomic Reports: Insights from Patients and Clinicians , 2018, Clinical and translational science.

[21]  Siamak Noorbaloochi,et al.  Validation of Screening Questions for Limited Health Literacy in a Large VA Outpatient Population , 2008, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[22]  Dan M. Roden,et al.  Leveraging the electronic health record to implement genomic medicine , 2012, Genetics in Medicine.

[23]  Miguel P Caldas,et al.  Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches , 2003 .