Limits of Calcaneal Lengthening for Treating Planovalgus Foot Deformity in Children With Cerebral Palsy

Background: Calcaneal lengthening is used to correct symptomatic planovalgus foot deformity, but outcomes have been less satisfactory in children with cerebral palsy. This study aimed to define limits of calcaneal lengthening by analyzing the risk factors for undercorrection of deformity. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 20 cases of children with cerebral palsy who underwent calcaneal lengthening of 30 planovalgus feet at a mean age of 11.9 years. Foot deformities were evaluated by the anteroposterior talo–first metatarsal angle (normal, 10 ± 7.0 degrees), lateral talo–first metatarsal angle (normal, 13 ± 7.5 degrees), and lateral calcaneal pitch angle (normal, 17 ± 6.0 degrees) on standing foot radiographs. Among these parameters, a corrected foot was defined as 2 or 3 parameters being corrected to within a normal range, and an undercorrected foot was only 1 or no parameter being corrected to within a normal range. Factors were compared between the corrected group and undercorrected group for significant predictors, and cutoff values of predictors were calculated for use as a clinical guideline. Results: Seventeen planovalgus feet were corrected satisfactorily by calcaneal lengthening, while the other 13 feet were undercorrected. Undercorrected feet had a greater preoperative anteroposterior talonavicular angle (33.7 vs 22.8 degrees, P = .001) and a smaller lateral calcaneal pitch (−1.7 vs 5.6 degrees, P = .03). A talonavicular angle of more than 24 degrees and calcaneal pitch less than −5 degrees were identified as cutoff values using a receiver operating characteristic curve. The predicted probability of undercorrection was 100% (9/9 feet) for 2 positive predictors, 50% (8/16 feet) for 1 positive predictor, and 0 (0/5 feet) for zero predictors. Conclusion: A talonavicular lateral subluxation of more than 24 degrees on the anteroposterior radiograph and a calcaneal pitch angle less than −5 degrees on the lateral radiograph were 2 independent predictors that could be used to identify a planovalgus deformity that would be beyond the corrective capacity of calcaneal lengthening to restore normal alignment. Level of Evidence Retrospective case control study, level III

[1]  F. Miller,et al.  Pes planovalgus deformity in children with cerebral palsy: review article , 2014, Journal of pediatric orthopedics. Part B.

[2]  L. Holmes,et al.  Long-term outcome of planovalgus foot surgical correction in children with cerebral palsy. , 2013, The Journal of foot and ankle surgery : official publication of the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons.

[3]  K. Lee,et al.  Calcaneal Lengthening for Planovalgus Foot Deformity in Patients With Cerebral Palsy , 2013, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[4]  L. Holmes,et al.  Pes planovalgus deformity surgical correction in ambulatory children with cerebral palsy , 2012, Journal of children's orthopaedics.

[5]  K. Lee,et al.  Reliability and validity of radiographic measurements in hindfoot varus and valgus. , 2010, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[6]  Erhan Mumcuoğlu,et al.  A comparison of two different techniques in the surgical treatment of flexible pes planovalgus: calcaneal lengthening and extra-articular subtalar arthrodesis , 2009, Journal of pediatric orthopedics. Part B.

[7]  L. Pugh,et al.  Calcaneocuboid Joint Subluxation After Calcaneal Lengthening for Planovalgus Foot Deformity in Children With Cerebral Palsy , 2009, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[8]  P. Raab,et al.  Calcaneal lengthening for planovalgus deformity in children with cerebral palsy. , 2009, Foot & ankle international.

[9]  K. S. Lee,et al.  Changes in dynamic foot pressure after surgical treatment of valgus deformity of the hindfoot in cerebral palsy. , 2008, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[10]  L. Döderlein,et al.  Evans Calcaneal Lengthening Procedure for Spastic Flexible Flatfoot in 32 Patients (46 Feet) with a Followup of 3 to 9 Years , 2006, Foot & ankle international.

[11]  C. Chung,et al.  Calcaneal Lengthening for the Planovalgus Foot Deformity in Children With Cerebral Palsy , 2005, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[12]  J. Davids,et al.  Quantitative Segmental Analysis of Weight-Bearing Radiographs of the Foot and Ankle for Children: Normal Alignment , 2005, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[13]  K. Noritake,et al.  Calcaneal lengthening for planovalgus foot deformity in children with spastic cerebral palsy , 2005, Journal of pediatric orthopedics. Part B.

[14]  L. Pugh,et al.  Early Graft Failure in Lateral Column Lengthening , 2004, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[15]  B. MacWilliams,et al.  Plantar Pressure and Radiographic Changes After Distal Calcaneal Lengthening in Children and Adolescents , 2001, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[16]  C. Tylkowski,et al.  Foot pressure and radiographic outcome measures of lateral column lengthening for pes planovalgus deformity. , 2000, Gait & posture.

[17]  F. Miller,et al.  Lateral column lengthening as treatment for planovalgus foot deformity in ambulatory children with spastic cerebral palsy. , 2000, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[18]  V. Mosca,et al.  Calcaneal lengthening for valgus deformity of the hindfoot. Results in children who had severe, symptomatic flatfoot and skewfoot. , 1995, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[19]  M. Rang,et al.  Varus and Valgus Deformities of the Foot in Cerebral Palsy , 1982, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[20]  D. Evans,et al.  Calcaneo-valgus deformity. , 1975, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.