Miejsce metody DEMATEL w rozwiązywaniu złożonych zadań decyzyjnych

DEMATEL was developed in the early 1970s to provide necessary means for identification of roles played by cause-effect chain system components. The method was initially applied to identify the nature of contemporary world’s economic, social, and environmental problems. The method’s merits made it popular again at the beginning of the new century. The range of method’s applications extended a lot. The contemporary applications of the method deal with complex problems which are totally different from its original purpose. The method proves to be a useful tool for providing necessary data for other approaches. It can also benefit from the application of other approaches. The method is utilized to extend numerous decision and management support approaches as well. A review of such applications of the method are discussed in the paper.

[1]  Joseph Sarkis,et al.  A multiple stakeholder perspective on barriers to implementing China RoHS regulations , 2013 .

[2]  Chia-Chi Chang,et al.  The analysis of service acceptance framework for social games based on extensive technology acceptance model , 2010, PICMET 2010 TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT FOR GLOBAL ECONOMIC GROWTH.

[3]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  Revised DEMATEL: Resolving the Infeasibility of DEMATEL , 2013 .

[4]  Kenji Watanabe,et al.  Modeling Inoperability Propagation Using Bayesian Networks , 2010, Critical Infrastructure Protection.

[5]  Kèyù Zhü,et al.  Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process: Fallacy of the popular methods , 2014, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[6]  M. Dytczak,et al.  Is explicit processing of fuzzy direct influence evaluations in DEMATEL indispensable? , 2013, Expert Syst. Appl..

[7]  Doraid M. Dalalah.  A hybrid DEMATEL-TOPSIS Multi-Criteria Decision Making model , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Information Reuse & Integration.

[8]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  On the invalidity of fuzzifying numerical judgments in the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 2007, Math. Comput. Model..

[9]  Grzegorz Ginda,et al.  Identification of building repair policy choice criteria role , 2009 .

[10]  Shamsuddin Ahmed,et al.  Expanded DEMATEL for Determining Cause and Effect Group in Bidirectional Relations , 2014, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[11]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  Fuzzy decision maps: a generalization of the DEMATEL methods , 2010, Soft Comput..

[12]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  A balanced scorecard approach to establish a performance evaluation and relationship model for hot spring hotels based on a hybrid MCDM model combining DEMATEL and ANP , 2011 .

[13]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  Defuzzification within a Multicriteria Decision Model , 2003, Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzziness Knowl. Based Syst..

[14]  Babak Jamshidi Navid,et al.  Analyzing effective elements in agile supply chain , 2012 .

[15]  Ming-Lang Tseng,et al.  Using the extension of DEMATEL to integrate hotel service quality perceptions into a cause-effect model in uncertainty , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[16]  Lawrence W. Lan,et al.  Exploring decisive factors affecting an organization's SaaS adoption: A case study , 2011, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[17]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  Identification of a threshold value for the DEMATEL method using the maximum mean de-entropy algorithm to find critical services provided by a semiconductor intellectual property mall , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[18]  H. Mizuyama,et al.  Systematic decision making process for identifying the contradictions to be tackled by TRIZ to accomplish product innovation , 2007 .