Situating technological and societal futures. Pragmatist engagements with computer simulations and social dynamics

Abstract This article employs pragmatist ideas to conceptualise the interdependencies of epistemic instruments and societal futures. Drawing on recent discussions in science and technology studies, it argues that the numerical predictions of computer simulations do not only create novel kinds of future knowledge (epistemic performativity), but also new practices and arrangements of prediction (social performativity). The conceptual framework centres on Dewey's logic of inquiry as the transformation of indeterminate into determinate situations and the role which epistemic instruments such as computer simulations play in this transformation. In order to trace the social performativity of numerical predictions, the paper will provide answers to three questions from a pragmatist perspective. The first question concerns the agency of computer simulations as transformative means in social relations. The second revolves around the impact of these simulations on specific ways of thinking about the future. And, third, the observation and analysis of these changes through empirical research will be addressed.

[1]  Mikaela Sundberg,et al.  The Everyday World of Simulation Modeling , 2009 .

[2]  MAX WEBER Wissenschaft als Beruf , 1989 .

[3]  W. Thomas,et al.  The Child in America: Behavior Problems and Programs , 2017 .

[4]  B. Latour,et al.  Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts , 1983 .

[5]  D. MacKenzie,et al.  Do Economists Make Markets?: On the Performativity of Economics , 2007 .

[6]  E. C. Hughes,et al.  Mistakes at Work , 1951 .

[7]  Cassirer Ernst,et al.  Form und Technik , 1930 .

[8]  Eric Winsberg,et al.  Sanctioning Models: The Epistemology of Simulation , 1999, Science in Context.

[9]  John Dewey,et al.  Theory of valuation , 1939 .

[10]  Jan-H. Passoth,et al.  Agency Without Actors?: New Approaches to Collective Action , 2012 .

[11]  S. Woolgar,et al.  The Manufacture of Knowledge: an Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science , 1982 .

[12]  Johann Feichter,et al.  Climate change and policy : the calculability of climate change and the challenge of uncertainty , 2011 .

[13]  Irving Louis Horowitz,et al.  The rise and fall of project Camelot : studies in the relationship between social science and practical politics , 1968 .

[14]  J. Dewey Human Nature and Conduct , 1921 .

[15]  William H. Starbuck,et al.  Computer simulation of human behavior , 1973 .

[16]  William James,et al.  Pragmatism : a new name for some old ways of thinking ; The meaning of truth : a sequel to Pragmatism , 2010 .

[17]  E. Cassirer,et al.  Symbol, Technik, Sprache , 1987 .

[18]  George H. Mead,et al.  Movements of Thought in the Nineteenth Century , 1936 .

[19]  Paul Humphreys,et al.  Extending Ourselves: Computational Science, Empiricism, and Scientific Method , 2004 .

[20]  N Oreskes,et al.  Verification, Validation, and Confirmation of Numerical Models in the Earth Sciences , 1994, Science.

[21]  G. N. Gilbert Computational Social Science , 2010 .

[22]  D. Ihde Instrumental Realism: The Interface between Philosophy of Science and Philosophy of Technology , 1991 .

[23]  D. Meadows,et al.  The Limits to Growth , 2018, Green Planet Blues.

[24]  John Dewey,et al.  The Quest for Certainty: A Study of the Relation of Knowledge and Action , 1960 .

[25]  Gary Alan Fine,et al.  Present, Past, and Future , 2001 .

[26]  B. Latour On Technical Mediation , 1994 .

[27]  Sergio Sismondo Models, Simulations, and Their Objects , 1999 .

[28]  P. N. Edwards GLOBAL CLIMATE SCIENCE, UNCERTAINTY AND POLITICS: DATA-LADEN MODELS, MODEL-FILTERED DATA , 1999 .

[29]  R. Merton The Self-Fulfilling Prophecy , 1948 .

[30]  R. Popper How are foresight methods selected , 2008 .

[31]  Lucy Suchman Plans and situated actions: the problem of human-machine communication , 1987 .

[32]  J. Dewey Logic, the theory of inquiry , 1938 .

[33]  John McLeod Simulation Is Wha-a-At , 1963 .

[34]  S. Shackley,et al.  Representing Uncertainty in Global Climate Change Science and Policy: Boundary-Ordering Devices and Authority , 1996 .

[35]  C. Debresson,et al.  Forces of production : a social history of industrial automation , 1985 .

[36]  William James,et al.  Pragmatism’s Conception of Truth , 1907, The Nature of Truth.

[37]  R. Axelrod Simulation in Social Sciences , 2007 .

[38]  Alex Preda,et al.  Socio-Technical Agency in Financial Markets , 2006 .

[39]  Richard N. Adams,et al.  The Rise And Fall Of Project Camelot , 1967 .

[40]  A. Pickering The mangle of practice : time, agency, and science , 1997 .

[41]  Wendell Bell Futures studies comes of age: twenty-five years after The limits to growth , 2001 .

[42]  David M. Gann,et al.  "In Case of Fire, Please Use the Elevator": Simulation Technology and Organization in Fire Engineering , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[43]  Klaus Lompe Problems of futures research in the social sciences , 1969 .

[44]  J. Dewey Experience and Nature , 1960 .

[45]  G. Mead The Philosophy Of The Present , 1959 .

[46]  J. Dewey,et al.  Essays in the experimental logic , 1916 .

[47]  G. Mead,et al.  The philosophy of the act , 1938 .

[48]  Howard Falk,et al.  The Technological Society , 1965 .

[49]  Margaret Morrison,et al.  Models as Mediators: Perspectives on Natural and Social Science , 1999 .