Selective dual nuclear scanning in low-risk patients with chest pain to reliably identify and exclude acute coronary syndromes.

STUDY OBJECTIVE We sought to determine the use in routine clinical practice of selective dual nuclear cardiac scanning (rest and stress) in low-risk patients with chest pain for identifying and excluding acute coronary syndromes (ACSs) during the initial emergency department evaluation. METHODS A prospective observational study was conducted over 13 months in 1,775 low-risk patients with chest pain who had intermediate- and high-risk ACSs ruled out by means of our 2-hour protocol, which consists of automated serial 12-lead ECG monitoring in conjunction with baseline and 2-hour creatine kinase (CK) MB and troponin I (cTnI) measurements. At the completion of the 2-hour evaluation period, low-risk patients were stratified by means of physician judgment into 1 of 2 categories: category III, possible ACS; and category IV, probable non-ACS chest pain. Level III patients underwent immediate dual nuclear scanning (rest thallium and stress sestamibi scanning), and level IV patients were discharged directly from the ED unless another serious non-ACS medical condition was thought to exist. Rest and stress scans were interpreted by a board-certified radiologist contemporaneous with patient evaluation. All patients were followed up for 30-day ACS, which was defined as acute myocardial infarction, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty/coronary artery bypass grafting, coronary arteriography revealing stenosis of the major coronary artery of 70% or greater not amenable to percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty/coronary artery bypass grafting, life-threatening complication, or cardiac death within 30 days of ED presentation. RESULTS A total of 2,206 ED patients with chest pain were evaluated for ACS during the study period. Four hundred thirty-one patients were excluded for having 1 or more of the following findings: initial ECG diagnostic of injury; baseline CK-MB level, cTnI level, or both diagnostic of acute myocardial infarction; 2-hour DeltaCK-MB level of +1.5 ng/mL or greater; 2-hour DeltacTnI level of +0.2 ng/mL or greater; injury or new or evolving ischemia on serial 12-lead ECG monitoring; or clinical diagnosis of ACS. Of the 1,775 study patients, 805 (45.4%) underwent immediate dual nuclear scanning. A positive stress nuclear scan result was more sensitive (97.3% versus 71.2%, P <.0001) and specific (87.7% versus 72.6%, P <.0001) for 30-day ACS than a positive resting nuclear scan result. The protocol of selective dual nuclear scanning (ie, patients who did not undergo dual nuclear scanning were counted as having a negative test result) had a sensitivity and specificity for 30-day ACS of 93.4% and 94.7%, respectively (positive likelihood ratio 17.6; negative likelihood ratio 0.07). CONCLUSION Stress nuclear scanning is more sensitive and specific than resting nuclear scanning for identification of ACS in low-risk patients with chest pain. A strategy of using selective dual nuclear scanning once high- and intermediate-risk ACS has been ruled out with our 2-hour evaluation both reliably identifies and reliably excludes 30-day ACS.

[1]  D. Gagnon,et al.  Technetium-99m sestamibi tomography in patients with spontaneous chest pain: correlations with clinical, electrocardiographic and angiographic findings. , 1991, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[2]  H. Tunstall-Pedoe,et al.  Myocardial Infarction and Coronary Deaths in the World Health Organization MONICA Project: Registration Procedures, Event Rates, and Case‐Fatality Rates in 38 Populations From 21 Countries in Four Continents , 1994, Circulation.

[3]  C. Orlandi,et al.  Emergency room technetium-99m sestamibi imaging to rule out acute myocardial ischemic events in patients with nondiagnostic electrocardiograms. , 1993, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[4]  Robert Woolard,et al.  Missed Diagnoses of Acute Cardiac Ischemia in the Emergency Department , 2000 .

[5]  M. Hlatky.  Evaluation of chest pain in the emergency department. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  J. Ornato,et al.  Comparison of myocardial perfusion imaging and cardiac troponin I in patients admitted to the emergency department with chest pain. , 1999, Circulation.

[7]  E. Pinnow,et al.  Routine stress testing for triage of patients with chest pain: is it worth the candle? , 1998, Annals of emergency medicine.

[8]  P. Fontanarosa,et al.  Emergency cardiac stress testing in the evaluation of emergency department patients with atypical chest pain. , 1993, Annals of emergency medicine.

[9]  S. Frederiksen,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of mandatory stress testing in chest pain center patients. , 1997, Annals of emergency medicine.

[10]  J. Hanley,et al.  A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. , 1983, Radiology.

[11]  A R Zinsmeister,et al.  A clinical trial of a chest-pain observation unit for patients with unstable angina. Chest Pain Evaluation in the Emergency Room (CHEER) Investigators. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  J. Ornato,et al.  Value of acute rest sestamibi perfusion imaging for evaluation of patients admitted to the emergency department with chest pain. , 1997, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[13]  S. Silvers,et al.  Clinical Policy: Critical Issues in the Evaluation and Management of Adult Patients Presenting With Suspected Acute Myocardial Infarction or Unstable Angina. , 2000, Annals of emergency medicine.

[14]  R. Roberts,et al.  An evaluation of a chest pain diagnostic protocol to exclude acute cardiac ischemia in the emergency department. , 1997, Archives of internal medicine.

[15]  R J Prineas,et al.  International diagnostic criteria for acute myocardial infarction and acute stroke. , 1984, American heart journal.

[16]  E. Braunwald.  Unstable angina : diagnosis and management , 1994 .

[17]  D. Berman,et al.  Incremental prognostic value of myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography for the prediction of cardiac death: differential stratification for risk of cardiac death and myocardial infarction. , 1998, Circulation.

[18]  R. Roberts,et al.  Costs of an emergency department-based accelerated diagnostic protocol vs hospitalization in patients with chest pain: a randomized controlled trial. , 1997, JAMA.

[19]  R. Gibbons,et al.  Guidelines for clinical use of cardiac radionuclide imaging. A report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Task Force on Assessment of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Cardiovascular Procedures, Committee on Radionuclide Imaging, developed in collaboration with the American Soc , 1995, Circulation.

[20]  D. Watson.  Quantitative SPECT techniques. , 1999, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[21]  Randall C. Thompson,et al.  Technetium-99m sestamibi myocardial perfusion imaging in the emergency room evaluation of chest pain. , 1994, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[22]  L. Graff,et al.  Impact on the care of the emergency department chest pain patient from the chest pain evaluation registry (CHEPER) study. , 1997, The American journal of cardiology.

[23]  F Schoonjans,et al.  MedCalc: a new computer program for medical statistics. , 1995, Computer methods and programs in biomedicine.

[24]  W. Cordell,et al.  Dobutamine stress tele-echocardiography for evaluation of emergency department patients with chest pain. , 1997, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[25]  M. Sayre,et al.  A rapid diagnostic and treatment center for patients with chest pain in the emergency department. , 1995, Annals of emergency medicine.

[26]  F. Fesmire,et al.  Delta CK-MB outperforms delta troponin I at 2 hours during the ED rule out of acute myocardial infarction. , 2000, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[27]  J. Muhlestein,et al.  An emergency department-based protocol for rapidly ruling out myocardial ischemia reduces hospital time and expense: results of a randomized study (ROMIO). , 1996, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[28]  R. Walls,et al.  Clinical correlates and prognostic significance of early negative exercise tolerance test in patients with acute chest pain seen in the hospital emergency department. , 1998, The American journal of cardiology.

[29]  F. Fesmire,et al.  Serial creatinine kinase (CK) MB testing during the emergency department evaluation of chest pain: utility of a 2-hour deltaCK-MB of +1.6ng/ml. , 1998, American heart journal.

[30]  S. Kaul,et al.  Value of regional wall motion abnormality in the emergency room diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. A prospective study using two-dimensional echocardiography. , 1991, Circulation.

[31]  J P Ornato,et al.  Comprehensive strategy for the evaluation and triage of the chest pain patient. , 1997, Annals of emergency medicine.

[32]  E. Gallagher,et al.  Clinical utility of likelihood ratios. , 1998, Annals of emergency medicine.

[33]  E. Amsterdam,et al.  Evaluation of chest pain in low-risk patients presenting to the emergency department: the role of immediate exercise testing. , 1998, Annals of emergency medicine.

[34]  D. Berman,et al.  An economic analysis of an aggressive diagnostic strategy with single photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging and early exercise stress testing in emergency department patients who present with chest pain but nondiagnostic electrocardiograms: Results from a randomized trial. , 2000, Annals of emergency medicine.

[35]  F. Fesmire.  A rapid protocol to identify and exclude acute myocardial infarction: continuous 12-lead ECG monitoring with 2-hour delta CK-MB. , 2000, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[36]  F. Fesmire.  Which chest pain patients potentially benefit from continuous 12-lead ST-segment monitoring with automated serial ECG? , 2000, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[37]  F. Fesmire,et al.  Usefulness of automated serial 12-lead ECG monitoring during the initial emergency department evaluation of patients with chest pain. , 1998, Annals of emergency medicine.

[38]  A. Conn,et al.  Acute traumatic disruption of the thoracic aorta: emergency department management. , 1992, Annals of emergency medicine.

[39]  E. Cook,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of a new short-stay unit to "rule out" acute myocardial infarction in low risk patients. , 1994, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[40]  I. Mena,et al.  Evaluation of patients with chest pain and nondiagnostic ECG using thallium-201 myocardial planar imaging and technetium-99m first-pass radionuclide angiography in the emergency department. , 1992, Annals of Emergency Medicine.

[41]  L Goldman,et al.  A Critical Pathway for Management of Patients with Acute Chest Pain Who Are at Low Risk for Myocardial Ischemia: Recommendations and Potential Impact , 1997, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[42]  E F Cook,et al.  Ruling out acute myocardial infarction. A prospective multicenter validation of a 12-hour strategy for patients at low risk. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.