Exploring the role of receptor flexibility in structure-based drug discovery.

[1]  L. Pauling,et al.  The Oxygen Equilibrium of Hemoglobin and Its Structural Interpretation. , 1935, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  D. Koshland.  Application of a Theory of Enzyme Specificity to Protein Synthesis. , 1958, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  J. Changeux,et al.  ON THE NATURE OF ALLOSTERIC TRANSITIONS: A PLAUSIBLE MODEL. , 1965, Journal of molecular biology.

[4]  D. Koshland,et al.  Comparison of experimental binding data and theoretical models in proteins containing subunits. , 1966, Biochemistry.

[5]  J P Changeux,et al.  On the cooperativity of biological membranes. , 1967, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  G. Torrie,et al.  Monte Carlo free energy estimates using non-Boltzmann sampling: Application to the sub-critical Lennard-Jones fluid , 1974 .

[7]  J. Valleau,et al.  A Monte Carlo method for obtaining the interionic potential of mean force in ionic solution , 1975 .

[8]  M. Karplus,et al.  Dynamics of folded proteins , 1977, Nature.

[9]  USA: Going public on rights , 1977, Nature.

[10]  G. Torrie,et al.  Nonphysical sampling distributions in Monte Carlo free-energy estimation: Umbrella sampling , 1977 .

[11]  S. Spragg.  Biophysical chemistry , 1979, Nature.

[12]  James Andrew McCammon,et al.  Ligand-receptor interactions , 1984, Comput. Chem..

[13]  M. Karplus,et al.  Multiple conformational states of proteins: a molecular dynamics analysis of myoglobin. , 1987, Science.

[14]  S. Edelstein,et al.  Oxygen-organophosphate linkage in hemoglobin A. The double hump effect. , 1987, Biophysical journal.

[15]  Jacques Monod,et al.  Allosteric Proteins and Cellular Control Systems , 1989 .

[16]  S. Kim,et al.  "Soft docking": matching of molecular surface cubes. , 1991, Journal of molecular biology.

[17]  Fumio Hirata,et al.  The effects of solvent on the conformation and the collective motions of protein: normal mode analysis and molecular dynamics simulations of melittin in water and in vacuum , 1991 .

[18]  García,et al.  Large-amplitude nonlinear motions in proteins. , 1992, Physical review letters.

[19]  H. Berendsen,et al.  Essential dynamics of proteins , 1993, Proteins.

[20]  A. Leach,et al.  Ligand docking to proteins with discrete side-chain flexibility. , 1994, Journal of molecular biology.

[21]  K. Schulten,et al.  Principal Component Analysis and Long Time Protein Dynamics , 1996 .

[22]  I. Kuntz,et al.  Molecular docking to ensembles of protein structures. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[23]  J A McCammon,et al.  Theory of biomolecular recognition. , 1998, Current opinion in structural biology.

[24]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Folding funnels and binding mechanisms. , 1999, Protein engineering.

[25]  Y. Sugita,et al.  Replica-exchange molecular dynamics method for protein folding , 1999 .

[26]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Folding and binding cascades: shifts in energy landscapes. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Folding funnels, binding funnels, and protein function , 1999, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[28]  H. Berendsen,et al.  Collective protein dynamics in relation to function. , 2000, Current opinion in structural biology.

[29]  P. Kollman,et al.  Combined molecular mechanical and continuum solvent approach (MM-PBSA/GBSA) to predict ligand binding , 2000 .

[30]  T. Koyama,et al.  Crystal structure of cis-prenyl chain elongating enzyme, undecaprenyl diphosphate synthase , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  H. Bosshard,et al.  Molecular recognition by induced fit: how fit is the concept? , 2001, News in physiological sciences : an international journal of physiology produced jointly by the International Union of Physiological Sciences and the American Physiological Society.

[32]  A. IJzerman,et al.  Allosteric modulation of G protein-coupled receptors. , 2001, Current opinion in drug discovery & development.

[33]  A. Laio,et al.  Escaping free-energy minima , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[34]  H. Carlson.  Protein flexibility and drug design: how to hit a moving target. , 2002, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[35]  J. Berg,et al.  Molecular dynamics simulations of biomolecules , 2002, Nature Structural Biology.

[36]  A. Christopoulos.  Allosteric binding sites on cell-surface receptors: novel targets for drug discovery , 2002, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[37]  J. Mccammon,et al.  Computational drug design accommodating receptor flexibility: the relaxed complex scheme. , 2002, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[38]  D. Case,et al.  Insights into protein-protein binding by binding free energy calculation and free energy decomposition for the Ras-Raf and Ras-RalGDS complexes. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[39]  S. Teague.  Implications of protein flexibility for drug discovery , 2003, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[40]  B. Shoichet,et al.  Soft docking and multiple receptor conformations in virtual screening. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[41]  J. Mongan,et al.  Accelerated molecular dynamics: a promising and efficient simulation method for biomolecules. , 2004, The Journal of chemical physics.

[42]  H. Dyson,et al.  Unfolded proteins and protein folding studied by NMR. , 2004, Chemical reviews.

[43]  Hege S. Beard,et al.  Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 2. Enrichment factors in database screening. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[44]  W. L. Jorgensen.  The Many Roles of Computation in Drug Discovery , 2004, Science.

[45]  Brian K. Shoichet,et al.  Virtual screening of chemical libraries , 2004, Nature.

[46]  Holger Gohlke,et al.  Converging free energy estimates: MM‐PB(GB)SA studies on the protein–protein complex Ras–Raf , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[47]  J. Bajorath,et al.  Docking and scoring in virtual screening for drug discovery: methods and applications , 2004, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[48]  J Andrew McCammon,et al.  Discovery of a novel binding trench in HIV integrase. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[49]  D. Dryden,et al.  Allostery without conformational change , 1984, European Biophysics Journal.

[50]  Matthew P. Repasky,et al.  Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[51]  I. Bahar,et al.  Structural changes involved in protein binding correlate with intrinsic motions of proteins in the unbound state. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[52]  Supporting Information for “ Evolutionary profiles from the QR factorization of multiple sequence alignments ” , 2005 .

[53]  John Mongan,et al.  Biomolecular simulations at constant pH. , 2005, Current opinion in structural biology.

[54]  X. Barril,et al.  Unveiling the full potential of flexible receptor docking using multiple crystallographic structures. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[55]  G. Klebe.  Virtual ligand screening: strategies, perspectives and limitations , 2006, Drug Discovery Today.

[56]  Wilfred F van Gunsteren,et al.  Biomolecular modeling: Goals, problems, perspectives. , 2006, Angewandte Chemie.

[57]  Jens Meiler,et al.  ROSETTALIGAND: Protein–small molecule docking with full side‐chain flexibility , 2006, Proteins.

[58]  Woody Sherman,et al.  Use of an Induced Fit Receptor Structure in Virtual Screening , 2006, Chemical biology & drug design.

[59]  C. E. Peishoff,et al.  A critical assessment of docking programs and scoring functions. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[60]  Lewis E. Kay,et al.  New Tools Provide New Insights in NMR Studies of Protein Dynamics , 2006, Science.

[61]  Stewart A. Adcock,et al.  Molecular Dynamics: Survey of Methods for Simulating the Activity of Proteins , 2006 .

[62]  E. Oldfield,et al.  Bisphosphonates target multiple sites in both cis- and trans-prenyltransferases , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[63]  David L. Mobley,et al.  Chapter 4 Alchemical Free Energy Calculations: Ready for Prime Time? , 2007 .

[64]  G. Bouvignies,et al.  Exploring multiple timescale motions in protein GB3 using accelerated molecular dynamics and NMR spectroscopy. , 2007, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[65]  Markus Wagener,et al.  A flexible approach to induced fit docking. , 2007, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[66]  Gregory A Voth,et al.  Multiscale modeling of biomolecular systems: in serial and in parallel. , 2007, Current opinion in structural biology.

[67]  Campbell McInnes,et al.  Virtual screening strategies in drug discovery. , 2007, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[68]  Wilfred F van Gunsteren,et al.  Molecular simulation as an aid to experimentalists. , 2008, Current opinion in structural biology.

[69]  Donald Hamelberg,et al.  A statistical analysis of the precision of reweighting-based simulations. , 2008, The Journal of chemical physics.

[70]  R. Abagyan,et al.  Flexible ligand docking to multiple receptor conformations: a practical alternative. , 2008, Current opinion in structural biology.

[71]  Rommie E. Amaro,et al.  An improved relaxed complex scheme for receptor flexibility in computer-aided drug design , 2008, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[72]  Ruben Abagyan,et al.  Optimization of High Throughput Virtual Screening by Combining Shape‐Matching and Docking Methods. , 2008 .

[73]  César Augusto F. de Oliveira,et al.  Coupling Accelerated Molecular Dynamics Methods with Thermodynamic Integration Simulations , 2008, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[74]  D. Hazuda,et al.  Discovery of raltegravir, a potent, selective orally bioavailable HIV-integrase inhibitor for the treatment of HIV-AIDS infection. , 2008, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[75]  Oliver F. Lange,et al.  Recognition Dynamics Up to Microseconds Revealed from an RDC-Derived Ubiquitin Ensemble in Solution , 2008, Science.

[76]  R. Dror,et al.  Long-timescale molecular dynamics simulations of protein structure and function. , 2009, Current opinion in structural biology.

[77]  Dima Kozakov,et al.  Fragment-based identification of druggable 'hot spots' of proteins using Fourier domain correlation techniques , 2009, Bioinform..

[78]  B. Zagrovic,et al.  Conformational selection and induced fit mechanism underlie specificity in noncovalent interactions with ubiquitin , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[79]  Jacob Kongsted,et al.  An improved method to predict the entropy term with the MM/PBSA approach , 2009, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[80]  Arthur Christopoulos,et al.  Allosteric modulators of GPCRs: a novel approach for the treatment of CNS disorders , 2009, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[81]  Ian W. Davis,et al.  RosettaLigand docking with full ligand and receptor flexibility. , 2009, Journal of molecular biology.

[82]  J. Andrew McCammon,et al.  Independent-Trajectories Thermodynamic-Integration Free-Energy Changes for Biomolecular Systems: Determinants of H5N1 Avian Influenza Virus Neuraminidase Inhibition by Peramivir , 2009, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[83]  Vijay S. Pande,et al.  Accelerating molecular dynamic simulation on graphics processing units , 2009, J. Comput. Chem..

[84]  Somesh D. Sharma,et al.  Managing protein flexibility in docking and its applications. , 2009, Drug discovery today.

[85]  W. L. Jorgensen.  Efficient Drug Lead Discovery and Optimization , 2009 .

[86]  R. Nussinov,et al.  The role of dynamic conformational ensembles in biomolecular recognition. , 2009, Nature chemical biology.

[87]  J Andrew McCammon,et al.  Conformational selection in G-proteins: lessons from Ras and Rho. , 2010, Biophysical journal.

[88]  Wilfred F. van Gunsteren,et al.  Basic ingredients of free energy calculations: A review , 2009, J. Comput. Chem..

[89]  Rommie E. Amaro,et al.  Emerging methods for ensemble-based virtual screening. , 2010, Current topics in medicinal chemistry.

[90]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Induced Fit, Conformational Selection and Independent Dynamic Segments: an Extended View of Binding Events Opinion , 2022 .

[91]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Allostery and population shift in drug discovery. , 2010, Current opinion in pharmacology.

[92]  J. Andrew McCammon,et al.  Computer-Aided Identification of Trypanosoma brucei Uridine Diphosphate Galactose 4′-Epimerase Inhibitors: Toward the Development of Novel Therapies for African Sleeping Sickness , 2010, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[93]  Graeme Milligan,et al.  Allostery at G Protein-Coupled Receptor Homo- and Heteromers: Uncharted Pharmacological Landscapes , 2010, Pharmacological Reviews.

[94]  W. Jahnke,et al.  Allosteric non-bisphosphonate FPPS inhibitors identified by fragment-based discovery. , 2010, Nature chemical biology.

[95]  R. Baron,et al.  Water in Cavity−Ligand Recognition , 2010, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[96]  J. Andrew McCammon,et al.  Using Selectively Applied Accelerated Molecular Dynamics to Enhance Free Energy Calculations , 2010, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[97]  Giulio Rastelli,et al.  Fast and accurate predictions of binding free energies using MM‐PBSA and MM‐GBSA , 2009, J. Comput. Chem..

[98]  Ruben Abagyan,et al.  Recipes for the Selection of Experimental Protein Conformations for Virtual Screening , 2010, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[99]  A. Cavalli,et al.  Molecular basis of cyclooxygenase enzymes (COXs) selective inhibition , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[100]  Arthur J. Olson,et al.  AutoDock Vina: Improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading , 2009, J. Comput. Chem..

[101]  E. Oldfield.  Targeting isoprenoid biosynthesis for drug discovery: bench to bedside. , 2010, Accounts of chemical research.

[102]  J. Andrew McCammon,et al.  Mapping the Druggable Allosteric Space of G-Protein Coupled Receptors: a Fragment-Based Molecular Dynamics Approach , 2010, Chemical biology & drug design.

[103]  Joseph A. Bank,et al.  Supporting Online Material Materials and Methods Figs. S1 to S10 Table S1 References Movies S1 to S3 Atomic-level Characterization of the Structural Dynamics of Proteins , 2022 .

[104]  William L Jorgensen,et al.  Computationally-guided optimization of a docking hit to yield catechol diethers as potent anti-HIV agents. , 2011, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[105]  Eric T. Kim,et al.  How does a drug molecule find its target binding site? , 2011, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[106]  William Sinko,et al.  Applying Molecular Dynamics Simulations to Identify Rarely Sampled Ligand-bound Conformational States of Undecaprenyl Pyrophosphate Synthase, an Antibacterial Target , 2011, Chemical biology & drug design.

[107]  Vincent A Voelz,et al.  Taming the complexity of protein folding. , 2011, Current opinion in structural biology.

[108]  Emilio Gallicchio,et al.  Advances in all atom sampling methods for modeling protein-ligand binding affinities. , 2011, Current opinion in structural biology.

[109]  J Andrew McCammon,et al.  Studying functional dynamics in bio-molecules using accelerated molecular dynamics. , 2011, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[110]  Xavier Salvatella,et al.  Understanding biomolecular motion, recognition, and allostery by use of conformational ensembles , 2011, European Biophysics Journal.

[111]  Wolfgang Wenzel,et al.  Receptor flexibility in small‐molecule docking calculations , 2011 .

[112]  G. de Fabritiis,et al.  Complete reconstruction of an enzyme-inhibitor binding process by molecular dynamics simulations , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[113]  Jacob D. Durrant,et al.  Non-Bisphosphonate Inhibitors of Isoprenoid Biosynthesis Identified via Computer-Aided Drug Design , 2011, Chemical biology & drug design.

[114]  Tingjun Hou,et al.  Assessing the Performance of the MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA Methods. 1. The Accuracy of Binding Free Energy Calculations Based on Molecular Dynamics Simulations , 2011, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[115]  R. Dror,et al.  How Fast-Folding Proteins Fold , 2011, Science.

[116]  J. Changeux,et al.  Conformational selection or induced fit? 50 years of debate resolved , 2011, F1000 biology reports.

[117]  Patrick G. Blachly,et al.  Measuring the successes and deficiencies of constant pH molecular dynamics: A blind prediction study , 2011, Proteins.

[118]  David L Mobley,et al.  Alchemical free energy methods for drug discovery: progress and challenges. , 2011, Current opinion in structural biology.

[119]  J Andrew McCammon,et al.  Statistical mechanics and molecular dynamics in evaluating thermodynamic properties of biomolecular recognition , 2011, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.

[120]  J. Changeux,et al.  50th anniversary of the word “allosteric” , 2011, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[121]  Jacob D. Durrant,et al.  Molecular dynamics simulations and drug discovery , 2011, BMC Biology.

[122]  James Andrew McCammon,et al.  Predictive Power of Molecular Dynamics Receptor Structures in Virtual Screening , 2011, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[123]  William Sinko,et al.  Antibacterial drug leads targeting isoprenoid biosynthesis , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[124]  David L Mobley,et al.  Perspective: Alchemical free energy calculations for drug discovery. , 2012, The Journal of chemical physics.

[125]  J. Mccammon,et al.  Allosteric networks in thrombin distinguish procoagulant vs. anticoagulant activities , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[126]  Terpene Biosynthesis: Modularity Rules , 2012 .

[127]  J. Changeux.  Allostery and the Monod-Wyman-Changeux model after 50 years. , 2012, Annual review of biophysics.

[128]  Shuxing Zhang,et al.  Computational prediction of protein hot spot residues. , 2012, Current pharmaceutical design.

[129]  J Andrew McCammon,et al.  The dynamic structure of thrombin in solution. , 2012, Biophysical journal.

[130]  William Sinko,et al.  Protecting High Energy Barriers: A New Equation to Regulate Boost Energy in Accelerated Molecular Dynamics Simulations , 2011, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[131]  Levi C. T. Pierce,et al.  Routine Access to Millisecond Time Scale Events with Accelerated Molecular Dynamics , 2012, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[132]  Katrina W Lexa,et al.  Protein flexibility in docking and surface mapping , 2012, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.

[133]  Albert C. Pan,et al.  Structure and Dynamics of the M3 Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptor , 2012, Nature.

[134]  Woody Sherman,et al.  Exploring protein flexibility: incorporating structural ensembles from crystal structures and simulation into virtual screening protocols. , 2012, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[135]  J Andrew McCammon,et al.  Nucleotide-dependent mechanism of Get3 as elucidated from free energy calculations , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[136]  J Andrew McCammon,et al.  Accelerated molecular dynamics in computational drug design. , 2012, Methods in molecular biology.

[137]  Xavier Salvatella,et al.  Synergistic use of NMR and MD simulations to study the structural heterogeneity of proteins , 2012 .

[138]  R. Brüschweiler,et al.  Structural and Entropic Allosteric Signal Transduction Strength via Correlated Motions. , 2012, The journal of physical chemistry letters.

[139]  H. Gohlke,et al.  Structure-based computational analysis of protein binding sites for function and druggability prediction. , 2012, Journal of biotechnology.

[140]  Robert V. Swift,et al.  Rational Prediction with Molecular Dynamics for Hit Identification , 2012, Current topics in medicinal chemistry.

[141]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Expanding the conformational selection paradigm in protein-ligand docking. , 2012, Methods in molecular biology.

[142]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Send Orders of Reprints at Reprints@benthamscience.net Allo-network Drugs: Extension of the Allosteric Drug Concept to Protein- Protein Interaction and Signaling Networks , 2022 .

[143]  Rommie E. Amaro,et al.  Computational identification of a transiently open L1/S3 pocket for reactivation of mutant p53 , 2013, Nature Communications.

[144]  Gerhard Klebe,et al.  Dissecting the hydrophobic effect on the molecular level: the role of water, enthalpy, and entropy in ligand binding to thermolysin. , 2013, Angewandte Chemie.

[145]  J. Mccammon,et al.  Molecular recognition and ligand association. , 2013, Annual review of physical chemistry.

[146]  M. Orozco,et al.  Toward an atomistic description of the urea-denatured state of proteins , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[147]  J. Mccammon,et al.  Accounting for Receptor Flexibility and Enhanced Sampling Methods in Computer‐Aided Drug Design , 2013, Chemical biology & drug design.

[148]  J Andrew McCammon,et al.  Farnesyl Diphosphate Synthase Inhibitors from In Silico Screening , 2013, Chemical biology & drug design.

[149]  Albert C. Pan,et al.  The Dynamic Process of β2-Adrenergic Receptor Activation , 2013, Cell.

[150]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Water networks contribute to enthalpy/entropy compensation in protein-ligand binding. , 2013, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[151]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Allostery in Disease and in Drug Discovery , 2013, Cell.

[152]  Supramolecular Architecture of Rhodopsin in Native Photoreceptors Revealed by Cryo-Electron Tomography , 2013 .

[153]  Enhanced Conformational Sampling of M2 Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptor for Designing Selective Allosteric Drugs , 2013 .

[154]  J Andrew McCammon,et al.  Activation and dynamic network of the M2 muscarinic receptor , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[155]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Is it the shape of the cavity, or the shape of the water in the cavity? , 2014 .

[156]  Ping Jiang,et al.  Enhanced Sampling for Biomolecular Simulations , 2018, Springer Series on Bio- and Neurosystems.

[157]  David L. Mobley,et al.  Alchemical Free Energy Calculations : Ready for Prime Time ? , 2016 .