The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies

[1]  S. Pocock,et al.  Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration , 2007, Annals of Internal Medicine [serial online].

[2]  J. Higgins,et al.  Tools for assessing quality and susceptibility to bias in observational studies in epidemiology: a systematic review and annotated bibliography. , 2007, International journal of epidemiology.

[3]  M. Hotopf,et al.  Bias in psychiatric case–control studies , 2007, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[4]  D. Moher,et al.  Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review , 2006, The Medical journal of Australia.

[5]  David Moher,et al.  Reporting Randomized, Controlled Trials of Herbal Interventions: An Elaborated CONSORT Statement , 2006, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[6]  John P.A. Ioannidis,et al.  Comparison of evidence on harms of medical interventions in randomized and nonrandomized studies , 2006, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[7]  A. Dobson,et al.  RE: “QUALITY OF REPORTING OF OBSERVATIONAL LONGITUDINAL RESEARCH” , 2005 .

[8]  David L Schriger,et al.  Suggestions for improving the reporting of clinical research: the role of narrative. , 2005, Annals of emergency medicine.

[9]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  Better Reporting of Harms in Randomized Trials: An Extension of the CONSORT Statement , 2004, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[10]  V. McCormack,et al.  Issues in the reporting of epidemiological studies: a survey of recent practice , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[11]  D. Moher,et al.  Opportunities and challenges for improving the quality of reporting clinical research: CONSORT and beyond , 2004, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[12]  D. Altman,et al.  CONSORT statement: extension to cluster randomised trials , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[13]  Paul Glasziou,et al.  Assessing the quality of research , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[14]  D. Rennie,et al.  Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[15]  J. Sterne,et al.  What is newsworthy? Longitudinal study of the reporting of medical research in two British newspapers , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[16]  A. Ormerod.  CONSORT your submissions: an update for authors. , 2001 .

[17]  Douglas G Altman,et al.  Systematic reviews in health care: Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials. , 2001, BMJ.

[18]  D. Rennie.  CONSORT revised--improving the reporting of randomized trials. , 2001, JAMA.

[19]  M Egger,et al.  Value of flow diagrams in reports of randomized controlled trials. , 2001, JAMA.

[20]  Douglas G. Altman,et al.  The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials , 2001, The Lancet.

[21]  I. Olkin,et al.  Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement , 1999, The Lancet.

[22]  A R Feinstein,et al.  Clinical epidemiological quality in molecular genetic research: the need for methodological standards. , 1999, JAMA.

[23]  G. Smith,et al.  Meta-analysis Spurious precision? Meta-analysis of observational studies , 1998, BMJ.

[24]  N. Black.  Why we need observational studies to evaluate the effectiveness of health care , 1996, BMJ.

[25]  Paolo Vineis,et al.  A road map for efficient and reliable human genome epidemiology , 2006, Nature Genetics.