Construction of the structural definition-based terminology ontology system and semantic search evaluation

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to construct a structural definition-based terminology ontology system that defines the meanings of academic terms on the basis of properties and links terms with properties that are structured by conceptual categories (classes). This study also aims to test the possibility of semantic searches by generating inference rules and setting very complicated search scenarios. Design/methodology/approach For the study, 55,236 keywords from the articles of the “Korea Citation Index” were structurally defined and relationships among terms and properties were built. Then, the authors converted the RDB data into RDF and designed ontologies using the ontology developing tool Protege. The authors also tested the designed ontology with the inference engine of the Protege editor. The generated reference rules were tested by TBox and SPARQL queries. Findings The authors generated inference control rules targeting high-input-ratio data in the properties of classes by calculating the input ratio of real input data in the system, and then the authors executed a semantic search by SPARQL query by setting very complicated search scenarios, for which it would be difficult to deduce results via a simple keyword search. As a result, it was confirmed that the search results show the logical combination of semantically related term data. Practical implications The proposed terminology ontology system was constructed with the author keywords from research papers, it will be useful in searching the research papers which include the keywords as search results by the complex combination of semantic relation. And the Structural Terminology Net database could be utilized as an index database in retrieval services and the mining of informal big data through the application of well-defined semantic concepts to each term. Originality/value This paper presented a methodology for supporting IR using expanded queries based on a novel model of structural terminology-based ontology. The user who wants to access the specific topic can create query that brings the semantically relevant information. The search results show the logical combination of semantically related term data, which would be difficult to deduce results via traditional IR systems.

[1]  Anjo Anjewierden,et al.  The KACTUS View on the 'O' word , 1995, IJCAI 1995.

[2]  Asunción Gómez-Pérez,et al.  Building Legal Ontologies with METHONTOLOGY and WebODE , 2003, Law and the Semantic Web.

[3]  Young Man Ko,et al.  A Study on the Correlation between the Appearance Frequency of Author Keyword and the Number of Citation in the Humanities and Social Science Journal Articles of the Korea Citation Index (KCI) , 2013 .

[4]  Archana Shirke,et al.  Generating OWL ontologies from a relational databases for the semantic web , 2009, ICAC3 '09.

[5]  Irina Astrova,et al.  An HTML-Form-Driven Approach to Reverse Engineering of Relational Databases to Ontologies , 2005, Databases and Applications.

[6]  P. Sreenivasa Kumar,et al.  ERONTO: a tool for extracting ontologies from extended E/R diagrams , 2005, SAC '05.

[7]  Sylvie Ranwez,et al.  User Centered and Ontology Based Information*Retrieval System for Life Sciences , 2010 .

[8]  Seung-Jun Lee,et al.  A Study on Conversion Methods for Generating RDF Ontology from Structural Terminology Net (STNet) based on RDB , 2015 .

[9]  Shuigeng Zhou,et al.  A comparison study on feature selection of DNA structural properties for promoter prediction , 2012, BMC Bioinformatics.

[10]  D. Yoo,et al.  A Practical Military Ontology Construction for the Intelligent Army Tactical Command Information System , 2014, Int. J. Comput. Commun. Control.

[11]  Xiaoming Zhang,et al.  An R2RML-based Mapping System from Metal Materials Database to Ontology , 2013, 2013 Ninth International Conference on Semantics, Knowledge and Grids.

[12]  Sylvie Ranwez,et al.  User centered and ontology based information retrieval system for life sciences , 2010, BMC Bioinformatics.

[13]  Guntars Bumans Mapping between Relational Databases and OwL Ontologies: an example , 2010 .

[14]  Young-Koo Lee,et al.  RDB2RDF: completed transformation from relational database into RDF ontology , 2014, ICUIMC '14.

[15]  Irina Astrova Rules for Mapping SQL Relational Databases to OWL Ontologies , 2007, MTSR.

[16]  Yisheng Dong,et al.  Formal Approach and Automated Tool for Translating ER Schemata into OWL Ontologies , 2004, PAKDD.

[17]  Laurianne Sitbon,et al.  Towards semantic search and inference in electronic medical records: An approach using concept--based information retrieval. , 2012, The Australasian medical journal.

[18]  Oscar Corcho,et al.  Using a hybrid approach for the development of an ontology in the hydrographical domain , 2008 .

[19]  Ying Ding,et al.  OWL Ontology Extraction from Relational Databases via Database Reverse Engineering , 2013, J. Softw..

[20]  Raphael Volz,et al.  Migrating data-intensive web sites into the Semantic Web , 2002, SAC '02.

[21]  Nicolaas J. I. Mars,et al.  Bottom-Up Construction of Ontologies , 1998, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng..

[22]  Olegas Vasilecas,et al.  Building ontologies from relational databases using reverse engineering methods , 2007, CompSysTech '07.

[23]  Irina Astrova,et al.  Reverse Engineering of Relational Databases to Ontologies , 2004, ESWS.

[24]  Esmaeil Kheirkhah,et al.  An Approach For Transforming of Relational Databases to OWL Ontology , 2015, ArXiv.

[25]  Sidi Mohamed Benslimane,et al.  Acquiring owl ontologies from data-intensive web sites , 2006, ICWE '06.

[26]  Michael Gruninger,et al.  Methodology for the Design and Evaluation of Ontologies , 1995, IJCAI 1995.

[27]  Johan Montagnat,et al.  A survey of RDB to RDF translation approaches and tools , 2014 .

[28]  Daniel P. Miranker,et al.  Translating SQL Applications to the Semantic Web , 2008, DEXA.

[29]  Sharifullah Khan,et al.  R2O transformation system: relation to ontology transformation for scalable data integration , 2008, IDEAS '08.

[30]  F. J. López-Pellicera,et al.  Using a hybrid approach for the development of an ontology in the hydrographical domain , 2007 .

[31]  N. MaduraiMeenachi,et al.  A Survey on Usage of Ontology in Different Domain , 2012 .

[32]  Roberto Pirrone,et al.  VEBO: Validation of E-R Diagrams through Ontologies and WordNet , 2012, 2012 IEEE Sixth International Conference on Semantic Computing.

[33]  Man Li,et al.  Learning ontology from relational database , 2005, 2005 International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics.

[34]  Vishal Jain Information Retrieval through Multi-Agent System with Data Mining in Cloud Computing , 2012 .