Assessing the Potential of Geostationary Satellites for Aerosol Remote Sensing Based on Critical Surface Albedo

Geostationary satellites are increasingly used for the detection and tracking of atmospheric aerosols and, in particular, of the aerosol optical depth (AOD). The main advantage of these spaceborne platforms in comparison with polar orbiting satellites is their capability to observe the same region of the Earth several times per day with varying geometry. This provides a wealth of information that makes aerosol remote sensing possible when combined with the multi-spectral capabilities of the on-board imagers. Nonetheless, the suitability of geostationary observations for AOD retrieval may vary significantly depending on their spatial, spectral, and temporal characteristics. In this work, the potential of geostationary satellites was assessed based on the concept of critical surface albedo (CSA). CSA is linked to the sensitivity of each spaceborne observation to the aerosol signal, as it is defined as the value of surface albedo for which a varying AOD does not alter the satellite measurement. In this study, the sensitivity to aerosols was determined by estimating the difference between the surface albedo of the observed surface and the corresponding CSA (referred to as dCSA). The values of dCSA were calculated for one year of observations from the Meteosat Second Generation (MSG) spacecraft, based on radiative transfer simulations and information on the satellite acquisition geometry and the properties of the observed surface and aerosols. Different spectral channels from MSG and the future Meteosat Third Generation-Imager were used to study their distinct capabilities for aerosol remote sensing. Results highlight the significant but varying potential of geostationary observations across the observed Earth disk and for different time scales (i.e., diurnal, seasonal, and yearly). For example, the capability of sensing multiples times during the day is revealed to be a notable strength. Indeed, the value of dCSA often fluctuates significantly for a given day, which makes some instants of time more suitable for aerosol retrieval than others. This study determines these instants of time as well as the seasons and the sensing wavelengths that increase the chances for aerosol remote sensing thanks to the variations of dCSA. The outcomes of this work can be used for the development and refinement of AOD retrieval algorithms through the use of the concept of CSA. Furthermore, results can be extrapolated to other present-day geostationary satellites such as Himawari-8/9 and GOES-16/17.

[1]  Venkataraman Sivakumar,et al.  Variability in aerosol optical properties and radiative forcing over Gorongosa (18.97oS, 34.35oE) in Mozambique , 2015, Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics.

[2]  Marta Luffarelli,et al.  Joint retrieval of surface reflectance and aerosol properties with continuous variation of the state variables in the solution space – Part 1: theoretical concept , 2017, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques.

[3]  Teruyuki Nakajima,et al.  Aerosol model evaluation using two geostationary satellites over East Asia in May 2016 , 2019, Atmospheric Research.

[4]  M. Witek,et al.  A review and framework for the evaluation of pixel-level uncertainty estimates in satellite aerosol remote sensing , 2019, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques.

[5]  Bernhard Geiger,et al.  Land Surface Albedo Derived on a Daily Basis From Meteosat Second Generation Observations , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[6]  A. Okuyama,et al.  An Introduction to Himawari-8/9— Japan’s New-Generation Geostationary Meteorological Satellites , 2016 .

[7]  Xingfa Gu,et al.  Synergistic Retrieval of Multitemporal Aerosol Optical Depth Over North China Plain Using Geostationary Satellite Data of Himawari‐8 , 2018 .

[8]  James C. Barnard,et al.  Development of a Multispectral Albedometer and Deployment on an Unmanned Aircraft for Evaluating Satellite Retrieved Surface Reflectance over Nevada’s Black Rock Desert , 2018, Sensors.

[9]  Mitchell D. Goldberg,et al.  Remote sensing of aerosol and radiation from geostationary satellites , 2006 .

[10]  Xavier Ceamanos,et al.  On the Importance of Aerosol Composition for Estimating Incoming Solar Radiation: Focus on the Western African Stations of Dakar and Niamey during the Dry Season , 2015, ATMOS 2015.

[11]  Jean-Louis Roujean,et al.  Comparing Operational MSG/SEVIRI Land Surface Albedo Products From Land SAF With Ground Measurements and MODIS , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[12]  Felix C. Seidel,et al.  Critical surface albedo and its implications to aerosol remote sensing , 2011 .

[13]  Xavier Ceamanos,et al.  Can We Detect the Brownness or Greenness of the Congo Rainforest Using Satellite-Derived Surface Albedo? A Study on the Role of Aerosol Uncertainties , 2019, Sustainability.

[14]  M. Derrien,et al.  MSG/SEVIRI cloud mask and type from SAFNWC , 2005 .

[15]  M. Mishchenko,et al.  Absorption and scattering by molecules and particles , 2013 .

[16]  Xavier Ceamanos,et al.  AERUS‐GEO: A newly available satellite‐derived aerosol optical depth product over Europe and Africa , 2014 .

[17]  Lorraine A. Remer,et al.  Biomass Burning Aerosol Absorption Measurements with MODIS Using the Critical Reflectance Method , 2011 .

[18]  David M. Winker,et al.  Mesoscale Variations of Tropospheric Aerosols , 2003 .

[19]  Rasmus Fensholt,et al.  A comparison of the effectiveness of 6S and SMAC in correcting for atmospheric interference of Meteosat Second Generation images , 2010 .

[20]  Matthieu Plu,et al.  Monitoring aerosols over Europe: an assessment of the potential benefit of assimilating the VIS04 measurements from the future MTG/FCI geostationary imager , 2018, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques.

[21]  O. Boucher,et al.  A satellite view of aerosols in the climate system , 2002, Nature.

[22]  Lorraine A. Remer,et al.  Critical Reflectance Derived from MODIS: Application for the Retrieval of Aerosol Absorption over Desert Regions , 2012 .

[23]  P. Koepke,et al.  Optical Properties of Aerosols and Clouds: The Software Package OPAC , 1998 .

[24]  Johannes W. Kaiser,et al.  McClear: a new model estimating downwelling solar radiation at ground level in clear-sky conditions , 2013 .

[25]  C. Bretherton,et al.  Clouds and Aerosols , 2013 .

[26]  Shunlin Liang,et al.  Estimation of the Ocean Water Albedo From Remote Sensing and Meteorological Reanalysis Data , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[27]  Hiroshi Murakami,et al.  Common Retrieval of Aerosol Properties for Imaging Satellite Sensors , 2018 .

[28]  Shobha Kondragunta,et al.  A Geostationary Instrument Simulator for Aerosol Observing System Simulation Experiments , 2018, Atmosphere.

[29]  Alexei Lyapustin,et al.  A multi-angle aerosol optical depth retrieval algorithm for geostationary satellite data over the United States , 2011 .

[30]  Arve Kylling,et al.  The libRadtran software package for radiative transfer calculations (version 2.0.1) , 2015 .

[31]  J. Vanderlei Martins,et al.  MODIS Aerosol Optical Depth Retrievals with high spatial resolution over an Urban Area using the Critical Reflectance , 2008 .

[32]  Richard Siddans,et al.  An Observing System Simulation Experiment (OSSE) for Aerosol Optical Depth from Satellites , 2009 .

[33]  Robert Frouin,et al.  Satellite-Derived Surface Radiation Budget over the African Continent. Part II: Climatologies of the Various Components , 2001 .

[34]  Marta Luffarelli,et al.  Joint retrieval of surface reflectance and aerosol properties with continuous variation of the state variables in the solution space – Part 2: application to geostationary and polar-orbiting satellite observations , 2019, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques.

[35]  Robert E. Holz,et al.  Retrieval of aerosols over Asia from the Advanced Himawari Imager: Expansion of temporal coverage of the global Dark Target aerosol product , 2019 .

[36]  Yuk L. Yung,et al.  XCO2 retrieval error over deserts near critical surface albedo , 2016 .

[37]  Kenneth Holmlund,et al.  An update on EUMETSAT programmes and plans , 2020, Optical Engineering + Applications.

[38]  Laurent Menut,et al.  Impact of biomass burning on pollutant surface concentrations in megacities of the Gulf of Guinea , 2017 .

[39]  O. Hautecoeur,et al.  Daily estimates of aerosol optical thickness over land surface based on a directional and temporal analysis of SEVIRI MSG visible observations , 2010 .

[40]  Bernhard Geiger,et al.  Spectral Normalization and Fusion of Optical Sensors for the Retrieval of BRDF and Albedo: Application to VEGETATION, MODIS, and MERIS Data Sets , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[41]  Yoram J. Kaufman,et al.  Aerosol optical depth retrieval from GOES-8: Uncertainty study and retrieval validation over South America , 2002 .

[42]  Alessio Lattanzio,et al.  Joint retrieval of surface reflectance and aerosol optical depth from MSG/SEVIRI observations with an optimal estimation approach: 2. Implementation and evaluation , 2010 .

[43]  Josef Gasteiger,et al.  MOPSMAP v1.0: a versatile tool for the modeling of aerosol optical properties , 2018, Geoscientific Model Development.

[44]  W. Paul Menzel,et al.  INTRODUCING THE NEXT-GENERATION ADVANCED BASELINE IMAGER ON GOES-R , 2005 .

[45]  Shobha Kondragunta,et al.  GOES Aerosol/Smoke Product (GASP) over North America: Comparisons to AERONET and MODIS observations , 2007 .

[46]  R. Fraser,et al.  The Relative Importance of Aerosol Scattering and Absorption in Remote Sensing , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[47]  Michael J. Garay,et al.  New approach to the retrieval of AOD and its uncertainty from MISR observations over dark water , 2017 .

[48]  J. Schmetz,et al.  Supplement to An Introduction to Meteosat Second Generation (MSG) , 2002 .

[49]  Steven Platnick,et al.  Above-cloud aerosol radiative effects based on ORACLES 2016 and ORACLES 2017 aircraft experiments , 2019 .

[50]  Bernhard Mayer,et al.  Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Technical Note: the Libradtran Software Package for Radiative Transfer Calculations – Description and Examples of Use , 2022 .

[51]  Philip Watts,et al.  Joint retrieval of surface reflectance and aerosol optical depth from MSG/SEVIRI observations with an optimal estimation approach: 1. Theory , 2010 .

[52]  M. King,et al.  Determination of aerosol optical properties from inverse methods , 2013 .

[53]  Ernest Weingartner,et al.  Effects of relative humidity on aerosol light scattering: results from different European sites , 2012 .

[54]  Jonathan Crosier,et al.  In situ aerosol measurements taken during the 2007 COPS field campaign at the Hornisgrinde ground site , 2011 .