Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience Correlation-based Analysis and Generation of Multiple Spike Trains Using Hawkes Models with an Exogenous Input

The correlation structure of neural activity is believed to play a major role in the encoding and possibly the decoding of information in neural populations. Recently, several methods were developed for exactly controlling the correlation structure of multi-channel synthetic spike trains (Brette, 2009; Krumin and Shoham, 2009; Macke et al., 2009; Gutnisky and Josic, 2010; Tchumatchenko et al., 2010) and, in a related work, correlation-based analysis of spike trains was used for blind identification of single-neuron models (Krumin et al., 2010), for identifying compact auto-regressive models for multi-channel spike trains, and for facilitating their causal network analysis (Krumin and Shoham, 2010). However, the diversity of correlation structures that can be explained by the feed-forward, non-recurrent, generative models used in these studies is limited. Hence, methods based on such models occasionally fail when analyzing correlation structures that are observed in neural activity. Here, we extend this framework by deriving closed-form expressions for the correlation structure of a more powerful multivariate self- and mutually exciting Hawkes model class that is driven by exogenous non-negative inputs. We demonstrate that the resulting Linear–Non-linear-Hawkes (LNH) framework is capable of capturing the dynamics of spike trains with a generally richer and more biologically relevant multi-correlation structure, and can be used to accurately estimate the Hawkes kernels or the correlation structure of external inputs in both simulated and real spike trains (recorded from visually stimulated mouse retinal ganglion cells). We conclude by discussing the method's limitations and the broader significance of strengthening the links between neural spike train analysis and classical system identification.

[1]  Lee E Miller,et al.  Inferring functional connections between neurons , 2008, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[2]  A. Rainoldi,et al.  Part II , 2012 .

[3]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Spatio-temporal correlations and visual signalling in a complete neuronal population , 2008, Nature.

[4]  Don H. Johnson,et al.  Point process models of single-neuron discharges , 1996, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[5]  E J Chichilnisky,et al.  A simple white noise analysis of neuronal light responses , 2001, Network.

[6]  D. Q. Nykamp,et al.  A mathematical framework for inferring connectivity in probabilistic neuronal networks. , 2007, Mathematical biosciences.

[7]  P. Brémaud,et al.  Power spectra of general shot noises and Hawkes point processes with a random excitation , 2002, Advances in Applied Probability.

[8]  Kamiar Rahnama Rad,et al.  Mean-Field Approximations for Coupled Populations of Generalized Linear Model Spiking Neurons with Markov Refractoriness , 2009, Neural Computation.

[9]  Romain Brette,et al.  Generation of Correlated Spike Trains , 2009, Neural Computation.

[10]  Shy Shoham,et al.  Generation of Spike Trains with Controlled Auto- and Cross-Correlation Functions , 2009, Neural Computation.

[11]  R. Kass,et al.  Multiple neural spike train data analysis: state-of-the-art and future challenges , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[12]  L. Paninski,et al.  Superlinear Population Encoding of Dynamic Hand Trajectory in Primary Motor Cortex , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[13]  Alexander S. Ecker,et al.  Generating Spike Trains with Specified Correlation Coefficients , 2009, Neural Computation.

[14]  Dario L. Ringach,et al.  Reverse correlation in neurophysiology , 2004, Cogn. Sci..

[15]  H. L. Bryant,et al.  Identification of synaptic interactions , 1976, Biological Cybernetics.

[16]  Lennart Ljung,et al.  System Identification: Theory for the User , 1987 .

[17]  A. Hawkes Spectra of some self-exciting and mutually exciting point processes , 1971 .

[18]  Matthew Fellows,et al.  Statistical encoding model for a primary motor cortical brain-machine interface , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[19]  Liam Paninski,et al.  Statistical models for neural encoding, decoding, and optimal stimulus design. , 2007, Progress in brain research.

[20]  Diego A Gutnisky,et al.  Generation of spatiotemporally correlated spike trains and local field potentials using a multivariate autoregressive process. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  D. Brillinger Maximum likelihood analysis of spike trains of interacting nerve cells , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[22]  C. Granger Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods , 1969 .

[23]  A. Hawkes Point Spectra of Some Mutually Exciting Point Processes , 1971 .

[24]  Fred Wolf,et al.  Correlations and synchrony in threshold neuron models. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[25]  E. S. Chornoboy,et al.  Maximum likelihood identification of neural point process systems , 1988, Biological Cybernetics.

[26]  B. Noble,et al.  Methods Based on the Wiener-Hopf Technique. , 1960 .

[27]  Shy Shoham,et al.  Correlation-distortion based identification of Linear-Nonlinear-Poisson models , 2009, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[28]  Shy Shoham,et al.  Multivariate Autoregressive Modeling and Granger Causality Analysis of Multiple Spike Trains , 2010, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[29]  D. Brillinger The Identification of Point Process Systems , 1975 .