Challenges in the Development of a Regulatory Test Procedure for Neck Protection in Rear Impacts: Status of the EEVC WG20 and WG12 Joint Activity

A new European Enhanced Vehicle Safety Committee (EEVC) Working Group, WG20, was given the task to develop test procedures for rear end collisions, with a prime focus on neck injury reduction (whiplash). The work is carried out in collaboration with the EEVC WG12 (Advanced Anthropometry Adult Crash Dummies). WG20 is responsible for the definition of the test conditions and the overall coordination of this activity. WG12 is responsible for the selection of an appropriate crash test dummy and identification of biomechanically based injury criteria with known injury risk functions. WG20 carried out a review of field accident data, clinical data, available sled test methods, biomechanical research on injury causation and human subject dynamic response, proposed injury criteria, available impact dummies, and instrumentation and dummy positioning methods. The findings of the WG20 review provide the basis for the future work of the group and are summarized here. WG20 has a work program to develop and validate a test procedure to assess the geometry of head restraints as a first stage in their approach to whiplash injury mitigation. In the longer term a sled-based dynamic assessment of injury risk or seat performance will be developed and validated. WG12 has defined draft biofidelity requirements for rear impact crash test dummies and will evaluate the available rear impact dummies against these requirements once they are finalized. This paper summarizes the chosen biofidelity requirements and the criteria by which they were selected. It also outlines the further work program of the group to evaluate and validate biomechanically based injury criteria for rear impact crash testing.

[1]  C. Farmer,et al.  Relationship of head restraint positioning to driver neck injury in rear-end crashes. , 1999, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[2]  Harald Zellmer,et al.  BIOMECHANICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF THE REBOUND PHASE IN LOW SPEED REAR END IMPACTS , 2000 .

[3]  Terry A. Smith,et al.  Head/neck kinematic response of human subjects in low-speed rear-end collisions , 1997 .

[4]  D. Viano,et al.  Neck Displacements of Volunteers, BioRID P3 and Hybrid III in Rear Impacts: Implications to Whiplash Assessment by a Neck Displacement Criterion (NDC) , 2002 .

[5]  O. Boström,et al.  VALIDATION OF NECK INJURY CRITERIA USING RECONSTRUCTED REAL-LIFE REAR-END CRASHES WITH RECORDED CRASH PULSES , 2003 .

[6]  Mats Y. Svensson,et al.  A COMPARISON BETWEEN VOLUNTEER, BIORID P3 AND HYBRID III PERFORMANCE IN REAR IMPACTS , 1999 .

[7]  Maria Krafft NON-FATAL INJURIES TO CAR OCCUPANTS: INJURY ASSESSMENT AND ANALYSIS OF IMPACTS CAUSING SHORT AND LONG TERM CONSEQUENCES WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO NECK INJURIES , 1998 .

[8]  Anders Kullgren,et al.  Influence of Crash Pulse Characteristics on Whiplash Associated Disorders in Rear Impacts--Crash Recording in Real Life Crashes , 2002 .

[9]  David Hynd,et al.  APSN biometrics workshop - TRL rear impact volunteer testing - methods and measurements , 2006 .

[10]  Jac Wismans,et al.  Development and evaluation of a new rear-impact crash dummy: the RID2 , 2001 .

[11]  Johan Davidsson,et al.  Human Volunteer Kinematics in Rear-End Sled Collisions , 2001 .

[12]  A. Linder,et al.  Real-world rear impacts reconstructed in sled tests , 2004 .

[13]  N. Delson,et al.  NECK INJURY CRITERION BASED ON INTERVERTEBRAL MOTIONS AND ITS EVALUATION USING AN INSTRUMENTED NECK DUMMY , 1999 .

[14]  W. Spitzer,et al.  Scientific monograph of the Quebec Task Force on Whiplash-Associated Disorders: redefining "whiplash" and its management. , 1995, Spine.

[15]  Anders Kullgren,et al.  Final report EEVC European Enhanced Vehicle-safety Committee Ad-Hoc Group on Whiplash Injuries and EEVC WG12 Advanced Anthropometric Adult Crash Dummies , 2002 .

[16]  M H Pope,et al.  KINEMATICS OF THE HUMAN SPINE IN REAR IMPACT AND THE BIOFIDELITY OF CURRENT DUMMIES , 2002 .

[17]  W. Skalli,et al.  Human head and cervical spine behaviour during low-speed rear-end impacts: PMHS sled tests with a rigid seat , 2000 .

[18]  Dominique Cesari,et al.  TEST PROCEDURES FOR DEFINING BIOFIDELITY TARGETS FOR LATERAL IMPACT TEST DUMMIES , 1991 .

[19]  Anders Kullgren,et al.  Influence of Seat Geometry and Seating Posture on NICmax and Nkm AIS 1 Neck Injury Predictability , 2003 .

[20]  A. Kullgren,et al.  INJURY RISK FUNCTIONS IN FRONTAL IMPACTS USING RECORDED CRASH PULSES , 2001 .

[21]  R. P. Howard,et al.  Human head and neck kinematics after low velocity rear-end impacts-understanding "whiplash" , 1995 .