Evaluating the species energy relationship with the newest measures of ecosystem energy: NDVI versus

Ecosystem energy has been shown to be a strong correlate with biological diversity at continental scales. Early efforts to characterize this association used the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) to represent ecosystem energy. While this spectral vegetation index covaries with measures of ecosystem energy such as net primary production, the covariation is known to degrade in areas of very low vegetation or in areas of dense forest. Two of the new vegetation products from the MODIS sensor, derived by integrating spectral reflectance, climate data, and land cover, are thought to better approximate primary productivity than NDVI. In this study, we determine if the new MODIS derived measures of primary production, gross primary productivity (GPP) and net primary productivity (NPP) better explain variation in bird richness than historically used NDVI. Moreover, we evaluate if the two productivity measures covary more strongly with bird diversity in those vegetation conditions where limitations of NDVI are well recognized. Biodiversity was represented as native landbird species richness derived from the North American Breeding Bird Survey. Analyses included correlation analyses among predictor variables, and univariate regression analyses between each predictor variable and bird species richness. Analyses were done at two levels: for all BBS routes across natural landscapes in North America; and for routes in 10 vegetation classes stratified by vegetated cover along a gradient from bare ground to herbaceous cover to tree cover. We found that NDVI, GPP and NPP were highly correlated and explained similar variation in bird species richness when analyzed for all samples across North America. However, when samples were stratified by vegetated cover, strength of correlation between NDVI and both productivity measures was low for samples with bare ground and for dense forest. The NDVI also explained substantially less variation in bird species richness than the primary production in areas with more bare ground and in areas of dense forest. We conclude that MODIS productivity measures have higher utility in studies of the relationship of species richness and productivity and that MODIS GPP and NPP improve on NDVI, especially for studies with large variation in vegetated cover and density.

[1]  D. Bates,et al.  Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS , 2001 .

[2]  Kevin J. Gaston,et al.  Energy, species richness, and human population size: conservation implications at a national scale , 2003 .

[3]  Ranga B. Myneni,et al.  Analysis and optimization of the MODIS leaf area index algorithm retrievals over broadleaf forests , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[4]  J. Townshend,et al.  Global Percent Tree Cover at a Spatial Resolution of 500 Meters: First Results of the MODIS Vegetation Continuous Fields Algorithm , 2003 .

[5]  A. Hurlbert Species–energy relationships and habitat complexity in bird communities , 2004 .

[6]  José Alexandre Felizola Diniz-Filho,et al.  PRODUCTIVITY AND HISTORY AS PREDICTORS OF THE LATITUDINAL DIVERSITY GRADIENT OF TERRESTRIAL BIRDS , 2003 .

[7]  Jeremy T. Kerr,et al.  Butterfly Species Richness Patterns in Canada: Energy, Heterogeneity, and the Potential Consequences of Climate Change , 2001 .

[8]  Mark D. Schwartz,et al.  Assessing satellite‐derived start‐of‐season measures in the conterminous USA , 2002 .

[9]  A. G. Fischer LATITUDINAL VARIATIONS IN ORGANIC DIVERSITY , 1960 .

[10]  David H. Wright,et al.  Species-energy theory: an extension of species-area theory , 1983 .

[11]  Steven W. Running,et al.  A vegetation classification logic-based on remote-sensing for use in global biogeochemical models , 1994 .

[12]  A. Huete A soil-adjusted vegetation index (SAVI) , 1988 .

[13]  K. Gaston,et al.  People, energy and avian species richness , 2005 .

[14]  Cristina Milesi,et al.  User's Guide GPP and NPP (MOD17A2/A3) Products NASA MODIS Land Algorithm , 2003 .

[15]  J. Diniz‐Filho,et al.  Red herrings revisited: spatial autocorrelation and parameter estimation in geographical ecology , 2007 .

[16]  R. O’Connor,et al.  HOW WELL DO CONSISTENTLY MONITORED BREEDING BIRD SURVEY ROUTES REPRESENT THE ENVIRONMENTS OF THE CONTERMINOUS UNITED STATES? , 2004 .

[17]  J. Turner,et al.  Does Solar Energy Control Organic Diversity? Butterflies, Moths and the British Climate , 1987 .

[18]  C. Justice,et al.  A framework for the validation of MODIS Land products , 2002 .

[19]  J. Paruelo,et al.  ANPP ESTIMATES FROM NDVI FOR THE CENTRAL GRASSLAND REGION OF THE UNITED STATES , 1997 .

[20]  J. Nichols,et al.  Inference Methods for Spatial Variation in Species Richness and Community Composition When Not All Species Are Detected , 1998 .

[21]  Brent N. Holben,et al.  Accuracy of the AVHRR vegetation index as a predictor of biomass, primary productivity and net CO2 flux , 1989, Vegetatio.

[22]  Katherine L. Gross,et al.  WHAT IS THE OBSERVED RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SPECIES RICHNESS AND PRODUCTIVITY , 2001 .

[23]  J. Greenwood,et al.  Spatial scale, abundance and the species-energy relationship in British birds. , 2008, The Journal of animal ecology.

[24]  R. J. Torline,et al.  LANDSAT AGRICULTURAL LAND-USE SURVEY , 1977 .

[25]  A. J. Richardson,et al.  Distinguishing vegetation from soil background information. [by gray mapping of Landsat MSS data] , 1977 .

[26]  A. Huete,et al.  Overview of the radiometric and biophysical performance of the MODIS vegetation indices , 2002 .

[27]  D. Currie,et al.  Does climate determine broad‐scale patterns of species richness? A test of the causal link by natural experiment , 2003 .

[28]  D. Currie Energy and Large-Scale Patterns of Animal- and Plant-Species Richness , 1991, The American Naturalist.

[29]  James H. Brown,et al.  Domains of Diversity , 2004, Science.

[30]  Plant Richness is Negatively Related to Energy Availability in Semi-Arid Southern Africa , 1994 .

[31]  Bradford A. Hawkins,et al.  Summer vegetation, deglaciation and the anomalous bird diversity gradient in eastern North America , 2004 .

[32]  Kevin J. Gaston,et al.  Abundance, species richness and energy availability in the North American avifauna , 2006 .

[33]  J. G. Owen ON PRODUCTIVITY AS A PREDICTOR OF RODENT AND CARNIVORE DIVERSITY , 1988 .

[34]  Maosheng Zhao,et al.  A Continuous Satellite-Derived Measure of Global Terrestrial Primary Production , 2004 .

[35]  Photosynthetically active radiation absorbed by global land vegetation in August 1984 , 1993 .

[36]  Steven W. Running New Satellite Technologies Enhance Study of Terrestrial Biosphere , 2002 .

[37]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and multimodel inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2003 .

[38]  G. Luck,et al.  Primary productivity and species richness: relationships among functional guilds, residency groups and vagility classes at multiple spatial scales , 2004 .

[39]  Curtis H. Flather,et al.  Fitting species-accumulation functions and assessing regional land use impacts on avian diversity , 1996 .

[40]  K. Gaston,et al.  Species Richness, Environmental Correlates, and Spatial Scale: A Test Using South African Birds , 2002, The American Naturalist.

[41]  V. Carey,et al.  Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-Plus , 2001 .

[42]  J. Nichols,et al.  COMDYN: Software to study the dynamics of animal communities using a capture-recapture approach , 1999 .

[43]  K. Gaston Global patterns in biodiversity , 2000, Nature.

[44]  Allen H Hurlbert,et al.  The Effect of Energy and Seasonality on Avian Species Richness and Community Composition , 2002, The American Naturalist.

[45]  R. D. Ramsey,et al.  Accuracy assessment of the vegetation continuous field tree cover product using 3954 ground plots in the south‐western USA , 2005 .

[46]  M. Fladeland,et al.  Remote sensing for biodiversity science and conservation , 2003 .

[47]  Robert L. Pressey,et al.  A Comparison of Richness Hotspots, Rarity Hotspots, and Complementary Areas for Conserving Diversity of British Birds , 1996 .

[48]  M. Rosenzweig,et al.  Tilman's predicted productivity–diversity relationship shown by desert rodents , 1984, Nature.

[49]  C. Justice,et al.  The generation of global fields of terrestrial biophysical parameters from the NDVI , 1994 .

[50]  M. Mckinney Influence of settlement time, human population, park shape and age, visitation and roads on the number of alien plant species in protected areas in the USA , 2002 .

[51]  Kevin J. Gaston,et al.  Can the evolutionary‐rates hypothesis explain species‐energy relationships? , 2005 .

[52]  A. J. Richardsons,et al.  DISTINGUISHING VEGETATION FROM SOIL BACKGROUND INFORMATION , 1977 .

[53]  J. Nichols,et al.  ESTIMATING SPECIES RICHNESS: THE IMPORTANCE OF HETEROGENEITY IN SPECIES DETECTABILITY , 1998 .

[54]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2000 .

[55]  J. Kerr,et al.  From space to species: ecological applications for remote sensing , 2003 .

[56]  Robert H. Fraser,et al.  Vertebrate species richness at the mesoscale: relative roles of energy and heterogeneity , 1998 .

[57]  Richard Field,et al.  ENERGY, WATER, AND BROAD‐SCALE GEOGRAPHIC PATTERNS OF SPECIES RICHNESS , 2003 .

[58]  J. A. Schell,et al.  Monitoring vegetation systems in the great plains with ERTS , 1973 .

[59]  K. Rohde The larger area of the tropics does not explain latitudinal gradients in species diversity , 1997 .

[60]  David J. Currie,et al.  Large-scale biogeographical patterns of species richness of trees , 1987, Nature.

[61]  W. Link,et al.  ESTIMATING POPULATION CHANGE FROM COUNT DATA: APPLICATION TO THE NORTH AMERICAN BREEDING BIRD SURVEY , 1998 .

[62]  J. Kerr,et al.  The environmental basis of North American species richness patterns among Epicauta (Coleoptera: Meloidae) , 1999, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[63]  James H. Brown,et al.  Global Biodiversity, Biochemical Kinetics, and the Energetic-Equivalence Rule , 2002, Science.

[64]  L. Gillman,et al.  The influence of productivity on the species richness of plants: a critical assessment. , 2006, Ecology.

[65]  W. Cohen,et al.  Evaluation of MODIS NPP and GPP products across multiple biomes. , 2006 .

[66]  Jean-Philippe Gastellu-Etchegorry,et al.  Relating the Global Vegetation Index to net primary productivity and actual evapotranspiration over Africa , 1993 .

[67]  Kevin J Gaston,et al.  Dissecting the species–energy relationship , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[68]  M. Willig,et al.  The Relationship Between Productivity and Species Richness , 1999 .

[69]  Dawn M. Kaufman,et al.  LATITUDINAL GRADIENTS OF BIODIVERSITY:Pattern,Process,Scale,and Synthesis , 2003 .

[70]  W. Dulaney,et al.  Normalized difference vegetation index measurements from the Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer , 1991 .

[71]  M. C. Whiteside,et al.  Species Diversity in Chydorid (Cladocera) Communities , 1967 .

[72]  K. Rohde Latitudinal gradients in species diversity: the search for the primary cause , 1992 .

[73]  Alan H. Strahler,et al.  Global land cover mapping from MODIS: algorithms and early results , 2002 .

[74]  C. Justice,et al.  Validating MODIS Terrestrial Ecology Products: Linking In Situ and Satellite Measurements , 1999 .

[75]  A. Huete,et al.  Optical-Biophysical Relationships of Vegetation Spectra without Background Contamination , 2000 .

[76]  Alfredo Huete,et al.  Interpretation of the modified soil-adjusted vegetation index isolines in red-NIR reflectance space , 2007 .

[77]  D. Bystrak,et al.  The north american breeding bird survey. , 1981 .

[78]  Frédéric Baret,et al.  Validation of global moderate-resolution LAI products: a framework proposed within the CEOS land product validation subgroup , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[79]  W. Link,et al.  The North American Breeding Bird Survey Results and Analysis , 1997 .

[80]  R. Macarthur Mathematical Ecology and Its Place among the Sciences. (Book Reviews: Geographical Ecology. Patterns in the Distribution of Species) , 1974 .

[81]  J. Diniz‐Filho,et al.  Water links the historical and contemporary components of the Australian bird diversity gradient , 2005 .

[82]  Andrea Wright Parmenter,et al.  Ecological Causes and Consequences of Demographic Change in the New West , 2002 .

[83]  K. Hibbard,et al.  A Global Terrestrial Monitoring Network Integrating Tower Fluxes, Flask Sampling, Ecosystem Modeling and EOS Satellite Data , 1999 .

[84]  David Storch,et al.  Structure of the species–energy relationship , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.