Orthogonal polarization approach for three dimensional georadar surveys

Abstract This paper presents the results obtained from the combination of co-pole GPR data collected along perpendicular directions. The scope is to demonstrate how this approach can efficiently overcome pitfalls of traditional single orientation surveys and ensure target detection regardless of their geometrical and physical properties. This is of high importance especially when acquiring across targets that show directional dependencies of the preferential scattering components. This work relies on four field examples, each of them illustrating in detail the improvements and the advantages that a single image resulting from the stack of the two volumes can show, in particular what concerns target imaging.

[1]  Leslie M. Collins,et al.  Texture Features for Antitank Landmine Detection Using Ground Penetrating Radar , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[2]  J. Daniels,et al.  Ground penetrating radar polarization and scattering from cylinders , 2000 .

[3]  Luigi Zanzi,et al.  Ultrahigh-frequency radar sensor for humanitarian demining tested on different scenarios in 3D imaging mode , 2002, International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar.

[4]  Mark E. Everett,et al.  Ecohydrogeophysics at the Edwards Aquifer: insights from Polarimetric ground‐penetrating radar , 2009 .

[5]  Maurizio Lualdi TRUE 3D Acquisition using GPR over small areas: A cost effective solution , 2011 .

[6]  M. Lualdi,et al.  2D and 3D experiments to explore the potential benefit of GPR investigations in planning the mining activity of a limestone quarry , 2004, Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Grounds Penetrating Radar, 2004. GPR 2004..

[7]  Antonella Saisi,et al.  Investigation On Structures And MaterialsOf The Castle Of Avio (Trento, Italy) , 2005 .

[8]  J. Daniels,et al.  Analysis of GPR Polarization Phenomena , 1996 .

[9]  Luigi Zanzi,et al.  Testing a safe acquisition procedure for an effective application of GPR to security operations , 2005 .

[10]  Ralf Birken,et al.  EFFICIENT LARGE-SCALE UNDERGROUND UTILITY MAPPING WITH AMULTI-CHANNEL GROUND-PENETRATING IMAGING RADAR SYSTEM , 2002 .

[11]  P. M. van den Berg,et al.  Three-dimensional imaging of multicomponent ground-penetrating radar data , 2003 .

[12]  Luigi Zanzi,et al.  Analysis of Approximations and Aperture Distortion for 3D Migration of Bistatic Radar Data with the Two-Step Approach , 2010, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..

[13]  Mark Grasmueck,et al.  3D GPR reveals complex internal structure of Pleistocene oolitic sandbar , 2002 .

[14]  Jeroen Groenenboom,et al.  Multicomponent imaging of different objects with different strike orientations , 2002, International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar.

[15]  Marco Valente Seismic Strengthening of Non-Ductile R/C Structures Using Infill Wall or Ductile Steel Bracing , 2012 .

[16]  Antonella Saisi,et al.  Investigation strategies for the diagnosis of historic structures: on-site tests on Avio Castle, Italy, and Pišece Castle, Slovenia , 2008 .

[17]  Mark Grasmueck,et al.  Integration of Ground-Penetrating Radar and Laser Position Sensors for Real-Time 3-D Data Fusion , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[18]  Alan G. Green,et al.  Multicomponent georadar data: Some important implications for data acquisition and processing , 2000 .

[19]  Evert Slob,et al.  Material response analysis of georadar reflection data , 2004 .

[20]  Marco Valente Seismic Performance Assessment of a Non-Ductile RC Building Retrofitted by Steel Bracing or Fiber-Reinforced Polymers , 2012 .

[21]  Robert Langridge,et al.  Flower structures and Riedel shears at a step over zone along the Alpine Fault (New Zealand) inferred from 2-D and 3-D GPR images , 2012 .

[22]  Luigi Zanzi,et al.  A 3D GPR survey methodology for archeological applications , 2006 .

[23]  Fernando I. Rial,et al.  Three‐dimensional ground‐penetrating radar strategies over an indoor archaeological site: Convent of Santo Domingo (Lugo, Spain) , 2010 .

[24]  Kris Vanneste,et al.  Pseudo-3D imaging of a low-slip-rate, active normal fault using shallow geophysical methods: The Geleen fault in the Belgian Maas River valley , 2008 .

[25]  Antonella Saisi,et al.  Radar investigation as a complementary tool for the diagnosis of historic masonry buildings , 2011 .

[26]  Lieven Verdonck,et al.  2D and 3D ground‐penetrating radar surveys with a modular system: data processing strategies and results from archaeological field tests , 2013, IWAGPR 2013.

[27]  Jens Tronicke,et al.  On the Potential of Kinematic GPR Surveying Using a Self-Tracking Total Station: Evaluating System Crosstalk and Latency , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[28]  Jeroen Groenenboom,et al.  3D GPR data acquisition and the influence of positioning errors on image quality , 2001 .

[29]  Constantine A. Balanis,et al.  Antenna Theory: Analysis and Design , 1982 .

[30]  Mrinal K. Sen,et al.  Vertical fracture detection by exploiting the polarization properties of ground-penetrating radar signals , 2004 .

[31]  Jakob B. U. Haldorsen,et al.  Imaging radar maps underground objects in 3-D , 2000 .

[32]  D. Daniels Ground Penetrating Radar , 2005 .