Adaptation to Visual Rearrangement: Role of Sensory Discordance

The relative contributions of proprioceptive and efferent information in eliciting adaptation to visual rearrangement were studied under two conditions of visual stimulation. Subjects permitted sight of their forearm under normal room illumination showed significant adaptation when the forearm was (a) moved up and down under the action of tonic vibration reflexes, (b) voluntarily moved through the same trajectory at the same pace, (c) viewed while still, and (d) viewed while the margins of the elbow were vibrated. The reflex movement condition elicited significantly greater adaptation than the other conditions. Subjects allowed only sight of a point source of light attached to their hand showed significant adaptation when the forearm was (a) reflexly moved, (b) voluntarily moved through the same trajectory at the same rate, (c) passively moved, (d) still, and (e) vibrated while still. Less adaptation occurred as the amount of proprioceptive information about limb position was decreased. The adaptation elicited by voluntary movements of the forearm and by reflex movements did not differ significantly. It is concluded that corollary-discharge signals may not be crucial in adaptation to visual rearrangement; a more important factor appears to be discordance between proprioceptive and visual information.

[1]  James R. Lackner,et al.  Some Mechanisms Underlying Sensory and Postural Stability in Man , 1978 .

[2]  F. J. Clark,et al.  Slowly adapting receptors in cat knee joint: can they signal joint angle? , 1975, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  H H Mikaelian Generalized sensorimotor adaptation with diminished feedback , 1974, Psychologische Forschung.

[4]  H. Mittelstaedt Action contingent development of vision in neonatal animals , 1968 .

[5]  J. Lackner A device for investigating adaptation to sensory rearrangement. , 1973, The Journal of psychology.

[6]  I P HOWARD,et al.  VISUOMOTOR ADAPTATION TO DISCORDANT EXAFFERENT STIMULATION. , 1965, Journal of experimental psychology.

[7]  Joel Goldberg,et al.  Immediate correction and adaptation based on viewing a prismatically displaced scene , 1966 .

[8]  James R. Lackner,et al.  Pursuit eye movements elicited by muscle afferent information , 1975, Neuroscience Letters.

[9]  D. McCloskey,et al.  The contribution of muscle afferents to kinaesthesia shown by vibration induced illusions of movement and by the effects of paralysing joint afferents. , 1972, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[10]  Hans Wallach,et al.  Adaptation to displaced vision contingent upon vibrating stimulation , 1966 .

[11]  P. Vittoz Man , 1962, Bloom.

[12]  P. Matthews Reflex Activation of the Soleus Muscle of the Decerebrate Cat by Vibration , 1966, Nature.

[13]  A M Graybiel,et al.  Prismatic adaptation under scotopic and photopic conditions. , 1970, Journal of experimental psychology.

[14]  R. Held,et al.  TWO TYPES OF ADAPTATION TO AN OPTICALLY-ROTATED VISUAL FIELD. , 1964, The American journal of psychology.

[15]  C. S. Harris Perceptual adaptation to inverted, reversed, and displaced vision. , 1965, Psychological review.

[16]  R. Held,et al.  Adaptation of Disarranged Hand-Eye Coordination Contingent upon Re-Afferent Stimulation , 1958 .

[17]  R. Held Exposure-history as a factor in maintaining stability of perception and coordination. , 1961, The Journal of nervous and mental disease.

[18]  J. Lackner Adaptation to Displaced Vision: Role of Proprioception , 1974, Perceptual and motor skills.

[19]  S. Freedman The Neuropsychology of spatially oriented behavior , 1968 .

[20]  R. Held Plasticity in sensory-motor systems. , 1965, Scientific American.

[21]  L. K. Canon,et al.  Directed attention and maladaptive "adaptation" to displacement of the visual field. , 1971, Journal of experimental psychology.

[22]  J Paillard,et al.  A proprioceptive contribution to the spatial encoding of position cues for ballistic movements. , 1974, Brain research.

[23]  I. Howard,et al.  Human Spatial Orientation , 1966 .