e-Research and learning theory: What do sequence and process mining methods contribute?

This paper discusses the fundamental question of how data-intensive e-research methods could contribute to the development of learning theories. Using methodological developments in research on self-regulated learning as an example, it argues that current applications of data-driven analytical techniques, such as educational data mining and its branch process mining, are deeply grounded in an event-focused, ontologically flat view of learning phenomena. These techniques provide descriptive accounts of the regularities of events, but have limited power to generate theoretical explanations. Building on the philosophical views of critical realism, the paper argues that educational e-research needs to adopt more nuanced ways for investigating and theorising learning phenomena that could provide an account of the mechanisms and contexts in which those mechanisms are realised. It proposes that future methodological extensions should include three main aspects: (1) stratified ontological frameworks, (2) multimodal data collection and (3) dynamic analytical methods. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

[1]  L. Shepard Psychometricians’ Beliefs About Learning , 1991 .

[2]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  Cognition as coordinated non-cognition , 2007, Cognitive Processing.

[3]  Wil M. P. van der Aalst,et al.  Workflow mining: discovering process models from event logs , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[4]  Barry Smith,et al.  Formal ontology, common sense and cognitive science , 1995, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[5]  Philip H. Winne,et al.  Improving Measurements of Self-Regulated Learning , 2010 .

[6]  Gautam Biswas,et al.  Measuring Self-Regulated Learning Skills through Social Interactions in a teachable Agent Environment , 2010, Res. Pract. Technol. Enhanc. Learn..

[7]  Jimmy Frerejean,et al.  Using process mining to identify models of group decision making in chat data , 2009, CSCL.

[8]  Allyson Hadwin,et al.  The learning kit project: Software tools for supporting and researching regulation of collaborative learning , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[9]  James L. McClelland Emergence in Cognitive Science , 2010, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[10]  P. Reimann,et al.  Process mining techniques for analysing patterns and strategies in students’ self-regulated learning , 2013, Metacognition and Learning.

[11]  Diana G. Oblinger,et al.  Fostering Learning in the Networked World: The Cyberlearning Opportunity and Challenge. A 21st Century Agenda for the National Science Foundation , 2008 .

[12]  Daniel C. Moos,et al.  Measuring Cognitive and Metacognitive Regulatory Processes During Hypermedia Learning: Issues and Challenges , 2010 .

[13]  P. F. Secord,et al.  Implications for psychology of the new philosophy of science. , 1983 .

[14]  Roger Azevedo,et al.  Self-efficacy and prior domain knowledge: to what extent does monitoring mediate their relationship with hypermedia learning? , 2009 .

[15]  Wilhelmiina Hämäläinen,et al.  Classiers for Educational Data Mining , 2010 .

[16]  Maria Bannert,et al.  Supporting self-regulated hypermedia learning through prompts , 2011, Instructional Science.

[17]  Philip H. Winne,et al.  Measuring Self-Regulated Learning , 2000 .

[18]  E. House Realism in Research , 1991 .

[19]  Jing Luan,et al.  Data mining: Going beyond traditional statistics , 2006 .

[20]  John C. Nesbit,et al.  Sequential Pattern Analysis of Learning Logs: Methodology and Applications , 2010 .

[21]  R. Snow,et al.  Aptitude-treatment interaction as a framework for research on individual differences in psychotherapy. , 1991, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[22]  Maria Bannert,et al.  Exploring regulatory processes during a computer-supported collaborative learning task using process mining , 2012, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[23]  M. Boekaerts SELF-REGULATED LEARNING: A NEW CONCEPT EMBRACED BY RESEARCHERS, POLICY MAKERS, EDUCATORS, TEACHERS, AND STUDENTS , 1997 .