User Interface Consistency Across End-User Applications: The Effects on Mental Models

Consistent user interfaces across applications are thought to facilitate transfer of learning because a user can draw on existing knowledge when using a new application. But despite the interface consistency guidelines and standards that are based on transfer of learning assumptions, few studies have investigated the effects of interface consistency, especially when a user interacts with multiple applications. The user's knowledge of a computer application is often described as a mental model. This study tested whether the consistency of the user interface across applications affects mental-model development when a user learns and uses multiple applications. One hundred and fourteen participants learned two prototype cooperative work applications in a controlled laboratory setting. Interface consistency across applications was manipulated for two attributes commonly referred to in interface design guidelines: the visual appearance of the display screen and the action language syntax. As hypothesized, inconsistent action language syntax across applications resulted in more user actions to complete tasks. Inconsistent visual appearance, however, resulted in greater accuracy, which was surprising. This study provides support for the consistency guideline for action language syntax, but a distinctive visual appearance rather than a consistent one might help the user form more accurate mental models when initially learning multiple applications. Schema theory is used to explain both the expected and the unexpected results. Implications and promising research directions are proposed.

[1]  R. Akscyn,et al.  The data model is the heart of interface design , 1988, CHI '88.

[2]  Robert P. Bostrom,et al.  Individual Differences and Conceptual Models in Training Novice Users , 1989, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[3]  David E. Kieras,et al.  An Approach to the Formal Analysis of User Complexity , 1999, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[4]  J. Nielsen,et al.  Coordinating user interfaces for consistency , 2001, SGCH.

[5]  Thomas P. Moran,et al.  Guest Editor's Introduction: An Applied Psychology of the User , 1981, CSUR.

[6]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Designing the user interface (2nd ed.): strategies for effective human-computer interaction , 1992 .

[7]  John M. Carroll,et al.  Learning, using and designing filenames and command paradigms† , 1982 .

[8]  Lorne Olfman,et al.  Visualization Ability as a Predictor of User Learning Success , 1993, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[9]  Daniel G. Bobrow,et al.  SOME PRINCIPLES OF MEMORY SCHEMATA , 1975 .

[10]  John R. Wilson,et al.  Mental Models: Theory and Application in Human Factors , 1989 .

[11]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  User Centered System Design: New Perspectives on Human-Computer Interaction , 1988 .

[12]  V. Barnett,et al.  Applied Linear Statistical Models , 1975 .

[13]  Allen Newell,et al.  The psychology of human-computer interaction , 1983 .

[14]  George Reynolds,et al.  Overcoming current growth limits in UI development , 1993, CACM.

[15]  Phyllis Reisner.  APT: A Description of User Interface Inconsistency , 1993, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[16]  John W. Satzinger,et al.  A research framework for exploring user interaction with multiple applications , 1994 .

[17]  Robert P. Bostrom,et al.  Training End Users: An Experimental Investigation of the Roles of the Computer Interface and Training Methods , 1993, MIS Q..

[18]  Christine L. Borgman,et al.  The user's mental model of an information retrieval system , 1999, SIGIR '85.

[19]  D. Bobrow,et al.  Representation and Understanding: Studies in Cognitive Science , 1975 .

[20]  D. Gentner.  Mental Models , 1983 .

[21]  Wendy A. Kellogg,et al.  CONCEPTUAL CONSISTENCY IN THE USER INTERFACE: EFFECTS ON USER PERFORMANCE , 1987 .

[22]  Nancy Staggers,et al.  Mental Models: Concepts for Human-Computer Interaction Research , 1993, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[23]  Jeff Miller,et al.  Visual similarity and discrimination demands. , 1981 .

[24]  イントランス.  Human interface guidelines : the apple desktop interface , 1989 .

[25]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Noncommand user interfaces , 1993, CACM.

[26]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  The case against user interface consistency , 1989, CACM.

[27]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Design rules based on analyses of human error , 1983, CACM.

[28]  Aaron Marcus,et al.  Human communications issues in advanced UIs , 1993, CACM.

[29]  R. Klatzky,et al.  Semantic factors in cognition , 1978 .

[30]  J. E. Ziegler,et al.  Learning and transfer for text and graphics editing with a direct manipulation interface , 1986, CHI '86.

[31]  B. Julesz,et al.  Detection versus Discrimination of Visual Orientation , 1984, Perception.

[32]  Alok Sinha.  Client-server computing , 1992, CACM.

[33]  Dennis Wixon,et al.  Book review: PRINCIPLES AND GUIDELINES IN SOFTWARE USER INTERFACE DESIGN by Deborah J . Mayhew (Prentice Hall, 1992) , 1993, SGCH.

[34]  James H. Gerlach,et al.  Understanding Human-Computer Interaction for Information Systems Design , 1991, MIS Q..

[35]  Aaron Marcus,et al.  User-interface developments for the nineties , 1991, Computer.

[36]  Deborah J. Mayhew,et al.  Principles and Guidelines in Software User Interface Design , 1991 .

[37]  Pamela Samuelson.  The ups and downs of look and feel , 1993, CACM.

[38]  C. Schafer,et al.  Transfer between word processing systems , 1986, CHI '86.

[39]  John L. Bennett,et al.  Tools for Building Advanced User Interfaces , 1986, IBM Syst. J..

[40]  Richard E. Berry,et al.  Common User Access - A Consistent and Usable Human-Computer Interface for the SAA Environments , 1988, IBM Syst. J..

[41]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction , 1998 .

[42]  James D. Foley,et al.  Fundamentals of interactive computer graphics , 1982 .

[43]  Thomas R. G. Green,et al.  Organization and Learnability in Computer Languages , 1984, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[44]  Phyllis Reisner,et al.  Formal Grammar and Human Factors Design of an Interactive Graphics System , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.

[45]  P. G. Polson,et al.  Transfer between menu systems , 1988, CHI '88.

[46]  D. Norman,et al.  Psychological Issues in Support of Multiple Activities , 1986 .

[47]  Lorne Olfman,et al.  The Importance of Learning Style in End-User Training , 1990, MIS Q..

[48]  Raymonde Guindon,et al.  Cognitive science and its applications for human-computer interaction , 1988 .

[49]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Accretion, tuning and restructuring: Three modes of learning , 1976 .

[50]  Pamela Samuelson.  Updating the copyright look and feel lawsuits , 1992, CACM.