Comparison of PM emissions from a gasoline direct injected (GDI) vehicle and a port fuel injected (PFI) vehicle measured by electrical low pressure impactor (ELPI) with two fuels: Gasoline and M15 methanol gasoline

Abstract Two Euro 4 gasoline passenger vehicles (one gasoline direct injected vehicle and one port fuel injected vehicle) were tested over the cold start New European Driving Cycle (NEDC). Each vehicle was respectively fueled with gasoline and M15 methanol gasoline. Particle number concentrations were measured by the electrical low pressure impactor (ELPI). Particle masses were measured by gravimetric method and estimated from the number distributions using two density distributions (one is constant with the particle size and one is power law related with the size). The first 7 stages of ELPI were used for estimation. The results show that for each vehicle, PM masses measured by gravimetric method, the total PM numbers measured by ELPI and estimated PM masses for M15 are lower than those for gasoline. For each kind of fuel, PM masses by two methods and total PM numbers from the GDI vehicle are higher than those from the PFI one. PM number distribution curves of the four vehicle/fuel combinations are similar. All decline gradually and the maximum number of each curve occurs in the first stage. More than 99.9% numbers locate in the first 8 stages of which diameters are less than 1 μm. PM number emissions correlate well with the acceleration of the two vehicles. The estimated particle masses were much lower than the gravimetric measurements.

[1]  D. Sonntag COMPARISON OF PARTICLE NUMBER AND MASS EMISSIONS FROM DIESEL TRANSIT BUSES ACROSS TEMPORAL AND SPATIAL SCALES , 2010 .

[2]  Simsoo Park,et al.  Comparative study of engine control strategies for particulate emissions from direct injection light-duty vehicle fueled with gasoline and liquid phase liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) , 2012 .

[3]  Wang Ying,et al.  Effects of Methanol/Gasoline Blends on a Spark Ignition Engine Performance and Emissions , 2008 .

[4]  J. C. Momique,et al.  Exhaust gas particle mass estimation using an electrical low pressure impactor , 2006 .

[5]  Ke Zeng,et al.  Effect of Methanol Addition into Gasoline on the Combustion Characteristics at Relatively Low Temperatures , 2006 .

[6]  Jehad A. A. Yamin,et al.  Effect of Methanol Addition on the Performance of Spark Ignition Engines , 2004 .

[7]  John M. E. Storey,et al.  Exhaust Particle Characterization for Lean and Stoichiometric DI Vehicles Operating on Ethanol-Gasoline Blends , 2012 .

[8]  M. Maricq,et al.  The effective density and fractal dimension of soot particles from premixed flames and motor vehicle exhaust , 2004 .

[9]  Richard E. Chase,et al.  Time-Resolved Measurements of Exhaust PM for FTP-75:Comparison of LII, ELPI, and TEOM Techniques , 2004 .

[10]  E. Zervas,et al.  Interlaboratory Test of Exhaust PM Using ELPI , 2005 .

[11]  C. Westbrook,et al.  Chemical kinetic modeling study of the effects of oxygenated hydrocarbons on soot emissions from diesel engines. , 2006, The journal of physical chemistry. A.

[12]  Katsumi Yoshida,et al.  S12 AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS , 1988 .

[13]  David L. Harrington,et al.  Automotive Spark-Ignited Direct-Injection Gasoline Engines , 2000 .

[14]  Jorma Keskinen,et al.  PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF THE ELECTRICAL LOW-PRESSURE IMPACTOR (ELPI) , 2000 .

[15]  Leonidas Ntziachristos,et al.  Real Time Measurements of Diesel Particle Size Distribution with an Electrical Low Pressure Impactor , 1998 .

[16]  Wang Jianxin,et al.  Unregulated Emissions and Combustion Characteristics of Low-Content Methanol-Gasoline Blended Fuels , 2010 .

[17]  Jorma Keskinen,et al.  Method for Measuring Effective Density and Fractal Dimension of Aerosol Agglomerates , 2004 .

[18]  Robert B. Jackson,et al.  China's growing methanol economy and its implications for energy and the environment , 2012 .

[19]  M. Maricq,et al.  The Impact of Ethanol Fuel Blends on PM Emissions from a Light-Duty GDI Vehicle , 2012 .

[20]  Zhihua Liu,et al.  Real-world operation conditions and on-road emissions of Beijing diesel buses measured by using portable emission measurement system and electric low-pressure impactor. , 2011, The Science of the total environment.

[21]  P. Mcmurry,et al.  Relationship between particle mass and mobility for diesel exhaust particles. , 2003, Environmental science & technology.

[22]  S. Krantz,et al.  Diesel Engine Development is Guided by Inadequate Particle Sampling , 1997 .

[23]  R. Harrison,et al.  Particle size distribution from a modern heavy duty diesel engine , 1999 .

[24]  Richard E. Chase,et al.  Measuring Particulate Mass Emissions with the Electrical Low Pressure Impactor , 2006 .

[25]  G. Andrews,et al.  Diesel Particle Size Distribution: The Conversion Of Particle Number Size Distribution To Mass Distribution , 2001 .

[26]  Atilla Bilgin,et al.  Effects of Methanol Addition to Gasoline on the Performance and Fuel Cost of a Spark Ignition Engine , 2008 .

[27]  Richard E. Chase,et al.  PM Measurement Artifact: Organic Vapor Deposition on Different Filter Media , 2004 .

[28]  Yunshan Ge,et al.  Carbonyl compound emissions from passenger cars fueled with methanol/gasoline blends. , 2010, The Science of the total environment.