Model reduction, validation, and calibration of wind power plants for dynamic studies

Accurate representation of wind power plants (WPP) in both offline and online power system stability studies has gained importance because of the rapid increase in installation of wind generation around the world. However, because increases in accuracy reduce computational efficiency, reduced WPP representation is preferred. To improve accuracy of the reduced WPP model, other authors have proposed changes in structure of the reduced model for large WPPs. Another alternative is model validation and calibration. In this paper, we compare accuracy improvements brought by changes in model structure with accuracy improvements brought by validation and calibration of the reduced WPP model with minimum changes in structure. We illustrate our findings using a 168-machine WPP connected to the IEEE 39-bus test system. The parameters of the reduced WPP model are either calculated with current equivalencing techniques or validated and calibrated against a more accurate model. The changes in structure of the reduced model are one-machine or two-machine reduced models connected with a one-line or two-line collector equivalent. We show that the most accurate response is obtained by calibrating the parameters of the reduced model with minimum changes in structure.

[1]  Eduard Muljadi,et al.  Development and Validation of WECC Variable Speed Wind Turbine Dynamic Models for Grid Integration Studies , 2007 .

[2]  V. Vittal,et al.  Impact of Increased Penetration of DFIG-Based Wind Turbine Generators on Transient and Small Signal Stability of Power Systems , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[3]  E. Muljadi,et al.  Validation of wind power plant models , 2008, 2008 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting - Conversion and Delivery of Electrical Energy in the 21st Century.

[4]  N.W. Miller,et al.  Dynamic modeling of GE 1.5 and 3.6 MW wind turbine-generators for stability simulations , 2003, 2003 IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37491).

[5]  V. Akhmatov Analysis of Dynamic Behaviour of Electric Power Systems with Large Amount of Wind Power , 2003 .

[6]  E. Muljadi,et al.  Equivalencing the collector system of a large wind power plant , 2006, 2006 IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting.

[7]  M. Pai Energy function analysis for power system stability , 1989 .

[8]  J. Sanchez-Gasca,et al.  Simplified wind turbine generator aerodynamic models for transient stability studies , 2006, 2006 IEEE PES Power Systems Conference and Exposition.

[9]  Jovica V. Milanovic,et al.  Probabilistic clustering of wind generators , 2010, IEEE PES General Meeting.

[10]  R. Podmore,et al.  A Practical Method for the Direct Analysis of Transient Stability , 1979, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems.

[11]  E. Muljadi,et al.  Method of equivalencing for a large wind power plant with multiple turbine representation , 2008, 2008 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting - Conversion and Delivery of Electrical Energy in the 21st Century.

[12]  H. Polinder,et al.  General Model for Representing Variable-Speed Wind Turbines in Power System Dynamics Simulations , 2002, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[13]  Luis M. Fernández,et al.  Equivalent models of wind farms by using aggregated wind turbines and equivalent winds , 2009 .