The numerical search for the optimum shape of an aerofoil is of great interest for aircraft and turbomachine designers. Unfortunately, this process is very computationally intense and can require a large number of individual flow field simulations resulting in very long CPU run times. One of the core issues that the designer must deal with is how to describe the shape of the airfoil. Clearly, we cannot treat the profile on a point by point basis as the problem would have an infinite number of degrees of freedom. Hence the typical practice is to resort to using a series of curves, such as polynomials and Bezier curves, to describe the profile. This typically reduces the number of degrees of freedom to a much smaller, manageable number. The influence of the selection of the parameterization on the optimization has received relatively little consideration to date. We can anticipate that some parameterizations will be less suitable for describing the profile shape and may result in slower convergence times. Our paper will discuss a new airfoil parameterization, Bezier-PARSEC, that was developed to extend and improve the typical Bezier parameterization found in use. This parameterization was found to fit the known shape of a wide range of existing airfoil profiles as well as resulting in accelerated convergence for aerodynamic optimization using Differential Evolution. Our presentation will present the development and details of the Bezier-PARSEC parameterization and provide evidence that the parameterization is suitable and accelerates convergence.
[1]
Timothy P. Rogalsky.
Acceleration of differential evolution for aerodynamic design
,
2004
.
[2]
R. Storn,et al.
Differential Evolution: A Practical Approach to Global Optimization (Natural Computing Series)
,
2005
.
[3]
Thomas Bäck,et al.
Evolutionary algorithms in theory and practice - evolution strategies, evolutionary programming, genetic algorithms
,
1996
.
[4]
Ioannis K. Nikolos,et al.
Freeform Deformation Versus B-Spline Representation in Inverse Airfoil Design
,
2008,
J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng..
[5]
Y. Y. Chan.
APPLICATIONS OF GENETIC ALGORITHMS TO AERODYNAMIC DESIGNS
,
1998
.
[6]
Theodore Theodorsen,et al.
Theory of wing sections of arbitrary shape
,
1933
.
[7]
R. Liebeck.
A Class of Airfoils Designed for High Lift in Incompressible Flow
,
1973
.
[8]
M. Selig.
Summary of low speed airfoil data
,
1995
.
[9]
Kazuhiro Nakahashi,et al.
Fractional factorial design of genetic coding for aerodynamic optimization
,
1999
.
[10]
R. W. Derksen,et al.
Differential Evolution in Aerodynamic Optimization
,
1999
.
[11]
Richard Eppler,et al.
Airfoil design and data
,
1990
.
[12]
Pei Li,et al.
MANUAL AERODYNAMIC OPTIMIZATION OF AN OBLIQUE FLYING WING
,
1998
.
[13]
R. Lewis,et al.
Vortex Element Methods for Fluid Dynamic Analysis of Engineering Systems
,
1991
.
[14]
H. Sobieczky.
Parametric Airfoils and Wings
,
1999
.