The use of proactive in-water grooming to improve the performance of ship hull antifouling coatings

The US Navy operates a large number of ships, however, unlike most commercial vessels they typically spend long periods of time in port where they may become fouled. This study investigated the feasibility of applying light cleaning (grooming) to maintain four surfaces free from fouling. The test surfaces were an ablative copper antifouling (AF) coating, a silicone fouling release (FR) coating, a two part marine epoxy, and a solid sheet of polytetrafluoroethylene plastic. The surfaces were exposed to static immersion in seawater on the East coast of Florida for 120 days and subjected to 3, 6, 12, and 24-day grooming intervals. Pre-groomed and post-groomed fouling conditions on each test surface were assessed and the maximum required lateral forces at each grooming event were measured. The results showed that grooming prevented or reduced the development of biofilm on the ablative copper coatings. The FR coatings that were groomed at the 3- and 6-day interval remained free from fouling until exposure to severe fouling pressure, which caused the 6-day interval to develop a small amount of fouling. Both the polytetrafluoroethylene and epoxy surfaces became fouled at all grooming frequencies, but fouling was reduced for the 3-day grooming frequency. The lateral forces required to groom the surfaces, with the exception of the FR coatings, increased with time. The results demonstrated that frequent grooming can have prolonged, positive effects on the AF performance of coatings.

[1]  Geoffrey Swain,et al.  Bioinspiration—the solution for biofouling control? , 2009, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[2]  M Atlar,et al.  The Measurement of the Drag Characteristics of Tin-free Self-polishing Co-polymers and Fouling Release Coatings Using a Rotor Apparatus , 2003, Biofouling.

[3]  A. Finnie.  Improved estimates of environmental copper release rates from antifouling products , 2006, Biofouling.

[4]  G. Swain,et al.  The influence of biofouling adhesion and biotic disturbance on the development of fouling communities on non‐toxic surfaces , 1998 .

[5]  Elizabeth Haslbeck,et al.  Variation Between Laboratory and In-Situ Methods for Determining Copper Release Rate from Navy-Approved Coatings , 2005 .

[6]  J. Callow,et al.  Trends in the development of environmentally friendly fouling-resistant marine coatings. , 2011, Nature communications.

[7]  Ronald O'Rourke.  Navy Ship Propulsion Technologies: Options for Reducing Oil Use - Background for Congress , 2006 .

[8]  Anne E Meyer,et al.  Biofouling and barnacle adhesion data for fouling‐release coatings subjected to static immersion at seven marine sites , 2000 .

[9]  M. Copisarow,et al.  MARINE FOULING AND ITS PREVENTION. , 1945, Science.

[10]  P H Benson,et al.  MARINE FOULING AND ITS PREVENTION , 1973 .

[11]  R. Townsin.  The Ship Hull Fouling Penalty , 2003, Biofouling.

[12]  T. Harder,et al.  Compounds from Silicones Alter Enzyme Activity in Curing Barnacle Glue and Model Enzymes , 2011, PloS one.

[13]  M. Schultz,et al.  The testing and evaluation of non-toxic antifouling coatings. , 1996, Biofouling.

[14]  M. Schultz.  Effects of coating roughness and biofouling on ship resistance and powering , 2007, Biofouling.

[15]  Janet M. Carey,et al.  Development of the primary bacterial microfouling layer on antifouling and fouling release coatings in temperate and tropical environments in Eastern Australia , 2009, Biofouling.

[16]  R. Wetherbee,et al.  Development of the initial diatom microfouling layer on antifouling and fouling-release surfaces in temperate and tropical Australia , 2009, Biofouling.

[17]  Geoffrey Swain,et al.  Measuring the Performance of Today's Antifouling Coatings , 2007 .

[18]  Katherine A Dafforn,et al.  The influence of antifouling practices on marine invasions , 2009, Biofouling.

[19]  A. Zirino,et al.  Environmental Effects from In-Water Hull Cleaning of Ablative Copper Antifouling Coatings , 1994 .

[20]  Geoffrey Swain,et al.  The development of microfouling on four commercial antifouling coatings under static and dynamic immersion , 2006 .

[21]  Redefining Antifoulings.  Redefining Antifouling Coatings , 2001 .

[22]  Gerard S. Bohlander,et al.  The National Shipbuilding Research Program, 1992 Ship Production Symposium Proceedings, Paper No. 3A-1: Microbial Biofilm Effects on Drag - Lab and Field , 1992 .