Trends and opportunities framing innovation for sustainability in the learning society

Abstract Innovation, a broad social and economic activity within emerging societies, transcends any specific technology, even if revolutionary, and is tied to attitudes and behaviours oriented towards the exploitation of change by adding value. In this context, we analyse on-going paths towards innovative societies taking into consideration their sustainable development. The solution-space for innovation for sustainability is characterised by three dimensions: 1) the entire lifespan of a product; 2) the entire socio-technic network of which a particular plant is part of, or from which a particular product emerges; and 3) stakeholders and decision processes, including business organisations and strategies; and public institutions, policy and regulatory frameworks. All theses three dimensions are shown to be critically related with the social appropriation of a broad knowledge base, which calls our special attention to the systems of innovation and competence building shaping our societies. Societies and their organisations differ in their approach to sustainability. Distinguishing between different types of stakeholders helps to elucidate barriers to change, and to exploit the solution-space for innovation. The contributions in this Special Issue illustrate various dimensions of the innovation-space and their related knowledge base. The examples addressed support the conclusion that the framework presented has general applicability to analyse and foster innovation for sustainability.

[1]  Edwin Datschefski,et al.  The Total Beauty of Sustainable Products , 2001 .

[2]  Nicholas A. Ashford,et al.  Pathways to Sustainability: Evolution or Revolution? , 2005 .

[3]  Stuart L. Hart,et al.  Global Sustainability and the Creative Destruction of Industries , 1999 .

[4]  Manuel V. Heitor,et al.  Innovation, Competence Building and Social Cohesion in Europe: Towards a Learning Society , 2003 .

[5]  Lester B. Lave,et al.  Implementing technology-forcing policies: The 1970 Clean Air Act Amendments and the introduction of advanced automotive emissions controls in the United States , 2005 .

[6]  B. Lundvall,et al.  The Learning Economy , 1994 .

[7]  J. Schumpeter,et al.  The Theory of Economic Development , 2017 .

[8]  Manuel V. Heitor,et al.  Regional development and conditions for innovation in the network society , 2005 .

[9]  H. Bruton A Reconsideration of Import Substitution , 1998 .

[10]  D. Meadows,et al.  The Limits to Growth , 2018, Green Planet Blues.

[11]  Jeffrey C. Fuhrer,et al.  Technology and growth: conference proceedings , 1996 .

[12]  T. W. F. Russell,et al.  The Structure of the Chemical Processing Industries:Function and Economics , 1979 .

[13]  Wil A. H. Thissen Systems engineering education for public policy , 2000, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[14]  G. Brundtland,et al.  Our common future , 1987 .

[15]  C. Freeman Economics of Industrial Innovation , 1975 .

[16]  Paul Stoneman,et al.  Handbook of the economics of innovation and technological change , 1995 .

[17]  R. Nelson,et al.  National Innovation Systems , 1993 .

[18]  M. Reuter,et al.  Process Knowledge, System Dynamics, and Metal Ecology , 2004 .

[19]  Paul M. Romer,et al.  The Origins of Endogenous Growth , 1994 .

[20]  J. Schumpeter Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy , 1943 .

[21]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[22]  Paul R. Ferguson,et al.  Industrial Economics: Issues and Perspectives , 1988 .

[23]  D. Meadows,et al.  The limits to growth. A report for the Club of Rome's project on the predicament of mankind. , 1972 .