Low Velocity Impact Behavior of Glass Filled Fiber-Reinforced Thermoplastic Engine Components

This paper concerns automotive parts located underneath the engine and in particular the engine oil pan. Classically made of stamped steel or cast aluminum, new developments have allowed the manufacture oil pans with polyamide 66 reinforced by 35% weight of short glass fiber. However, polyamides have some limitations and the most significant is their response to localized impact loading. The nature of the impact considered here is of a typical stone collected from the road and projected into the oil pan. Low velocity impact investigations were carried out using a gas gun and drop weight tower. The study shows that the design of the oil pan has a significant contribution in the shock absorption. In addition to the material properties, the geometry and the ribbing both cleverly combined, increase the impact resistance of the component significantly. Areas of oil pan design improvement have been identified and conclusions drawn.

[1]  Uday Sharma,et al.  Modeling and damage repair of woven thermoplastic composites subjected to low velocity impact , 2010 .

[2]  N. Naik,et al.  Polymer-matrix composites subjected to low-velocity impact: effect of laminate configuration , 2001 .

[3]  John Morton,et al.  The impact resistance of composite materials — a review , 1991 .

[4]  D. R. Moore,et al.  Failure and fracture of short glass fibre-reinforced nylon composites , 1985 .

[5]  G. Belingardi,et al.  Low velocity impact tests of laminate glass-fiber-epoxy matrix composite material plates , 2002 .

[6]  D. Bigg.  The Impact Behavior of Thermoplastic Sheet Composites , 1994 .

[7]  Chongdu Cho,et al.  Damage initiation and propagation in composite shells subjected to impact , 2007 .

[8]  A. Arici,et al.  Impact–fatigue behaviour of unidirectional carbon fibre reinforced polyetherimide (PEI) composites , 2006 .

[9]  Uday K. Vaidya,et al.  Performance of long fiber reinforced thermoplastics subjected to transverse intermediate velocity blunt object impact , 2005 .

[10]  N. Cabrera,et al.  The effect of temperature and strain rate on the impact performance of recyclable all-polypropylene composites , 2008 .

[11]  R. Farris,et al.  Comparative studies of ultra high molecular weight polyethylene fiber reinforced composites , 2007 .

[12]  M. Akay,et al.  Fracture toughness and impact behaviour of glass-fibre-reinforced polyamide 6,6 injection mouldings , 1995 .

[13]  J. Karger‐Kocsis,et al.  Mechanical performance of stretched knitted fabric glass fibre reinforced poly(ethylene terephthalate) composites produced from commingled yarn , 1999 .

[14]  N. Cabrera,et al.  Low velocity impact performance of recyclable all-polypropylene composites , 2006 .

[15]  C. Santulli,et al.  Impact properties of compression moulded commingled E-glass–polypropylene composites , 2002 .

[16]  John P. Dear,et al.  Impact damage processes in composite sheet and sandwich honeycomb materials , 2005 .

[17]  B. Scott,et al.  The Development of a Hybrid Thermoplastic Ballistic Material With Application to Helmets , 2005 .

[18]  Giovanni Belingardi,et al.  Influence of the laminate thickness in low velocity impact behavior of composite material plate , 2003 .