The Functional Perspective as a Lens for Understanding Groups

The functional perspective is a normative approach to describing and predicting group performance that focuses on the functions of inputs and/or processes. The aim of theory and research from this perspective is to understand why some groups are successful and others are not. This article investigates theory and, to a lesser extent, research of small groups based on the functional perspective. The authors present the underlying theoretical assumptions and review theories that fit into the functional perspective from several representative areas of research. They conclude by outlining notable strengths and weaknesses associated with viewing groups from this perspective and propose some directions for future theory development.

[1]  Tobias Greitemeyer,et al.  Preference-consistent evaluation of information in the hidden profile paradigm: beyond group-level explanations for the dominance of shared information in group decisions. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[2]  Vincent R. Brown,et al.  Enhancing ideational creativity in groups: Lessons from research on brainstorming. , 2003 .

[3]  B. Nijstad,et al.  Cognitive stimulation and interference in idea generating groups , 2003 .

[4]  Vincent R. Brown,et al.  Making Group Brainstorming More Effective: Recommendations From an Associative Memory Perspective , 2002 .

[5]  Mary T. Dzindolet,et al.  Social and Cognitive Influences in Group Brainstorming: Predicting Production Gains and Losses , 2002 .

[6]  Carl E. Larson,et al.  When Teams Work Best: 6,000 Team Members and Leaders Tell What it Takes to Succeed , 2001 .

[7]  Jonathon N. Cummings.  WORK GROUPS AND KNOWLEDGE SHARING IN A GLOBAL ORGANIZATION. , 2001 .

[8]  T. Postmes,et al.  Quality of decision making and group norms. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[9]  Randy Hirokawa,et al.  To Err is Human, to Correct for it Divine , 2001 .

[10]  Gwen M. Wittenbaum,et al.  The Collective Preference for Shared Information , 2001 .

[11]  E. Mannix,et al.  The Dynamic Nature of Conflict: A Longitudinal Study of Intragroup Conflict and Group Performance. , 2001 .

[12]  Jennifer L. Berdahl,et al.  The Study of Groups: Past, Present, and Future , 2000 .

[13]  G. Northcraft,et al.  You have printed the following article : Why Differences Make a Difference : A Field Study of Diversity , Conflict , and Performance in Workgroups , 2007 .

[14]  G. M. Wittenbaum,et al.  Mutual enhancement: Toward an understanding of the collective preference for shared information , 1999 .

[15]  J. Levine,et al.  Shared Cognition in-Organizations: The Management of Knowledge , 1999 .

[16]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits , 1999 .

[17]  Garold Stasser,et al.  The uncertain role of unshared information in collective choice. , 1999 .

[18]  Eric D. Sundstrom,et al.  Supporting work team effectiveness : best management practices for fostering high performance , 1999 .

[19]  Deborah G. Ancona,et al.  Cycles and synchrony : the temporal role of context in team behavior , 1999 .

[20]  J. R. Larson,et al.  Information Pooling: When It Impacts Group Decision Making , 1998 .

[21]  A. Pratkanis,et al.  Twenty-Five Years of Groupthink Theory and Research: Lessons from the Evaluation of a Theory. , 1998, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[22]  K. Jehn.  A qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in , 1997 .

[23]  L. H. Pelled.  Demographic Diversity, Conflict, and Work Group Outcomes: An Intervening Process Theory , 1996 .

[24]  K. Propp,et al.  Problem‐solving performance in naturalistic groups: A test of the ecological validity of the functional perspective , 1996 .

[25]  Allen C. Amason.  Distinguishing the Effects of Functional and Dysfunctional Conflict on Strategic Decision Making: Resolving a Paradox for Top Management Teams , 1996 .

[26]  Dennis S. Gouran,et al.  Functional Theory and Communication in Decision-Making and Problem-Solving Groups: An Expanded View , 1996 .

[27]  Gwen M. Wittenbaum,et al.  Management of information in small groups. , 1996 .

[28]  K. Jehn.  A Multimethod Examination of the Benefits and Detriments of Intragroup Conflict , 1995 .

[29]  P. R. Laughlin,et al.  A Theory of Collective Induction , 1995 .

[30]  Charles Pavitt,et al.  Theoretical Commitments Presupposed by Functional Approaches to Group Discussion , 1994 .

[31]  P. '. Hart,et al.  Groupthink in Government: A Study of Small Groups and Policy Failure , 1994 .

[32]  Deborah G. . Ancona,et al.  Bridging the Boundary: External Activity and Performance in Organizational Teams. , 1992 .

[33]  G. Stasser,et al.  Discovery of hidden profiles by decision-making groups: Solving a problem versus making a judgment. , 1992 .

[34]  P. Goodman.  Groups That Work (and Those That Don't)Groups That Work (and Those That Don't) by Hackman Richard. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1991, 512 pp. , 1992 .

[35]  Randy Hirokawa,et al.  Effective Group Decision Making in Organizations , 1992 .

[36]  David G. Mathiasen.  Groups that work (and those that Don't): Creating Conditions for Effective Teamwork, edited by J. Richard Hackman. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass 1990, 512 pp. Price: $39.95 cloth , 1991 .

[37]  E. Salas,et al.  Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: A meta-analytic integration. , 1991 .

[38]  Won-Woo Park,et al.  A Review of research on Groupthink , 1990 .

[39]  Verlin B. Hinsz,et al.  Cognitive and Consensus Processes in Group Recognition Memory Performance , 1990 .

[40]  Dennis S. Gouran.  Factors Affecting the Decision-Making Process in the Attorney General's Commission on Pornography: A Case Study of Unwarranted Collective Judgment , 1990 .

[41]  P. Swingle.  The resolution of conflict. , 1989 .

[42]  Carl E. Larson,et al.  Teamwork: What Must Go Right/What Can Go Wrong , 1989 .

[43]  G. Stasser,et al.  Information sampling in structured and unstructured discussions of three- and six-person groups. , 1989 .

[44]  J. K. Esser,et al.  Groupthink and the space shuttle Challenger accident: Toward a quantitative case analysis. , 1989 .

[45]  R. Field.  Crucial Decisions: Leadership in Policymaking and Crisis Management , 1989 .

[46]  Dennis S. Gouran,et al.  Understanding the Sources of Faulty Group Decision Making , 1988 .

[47]  Randy Hirokawa.  Group Communication and Decision-Making Performance: A Continued Test of the Functional Perspective. , 1988 .

[48]  P. R. Laughlin.  Collective induction: Group performance, social combination processes, and mutual majority and minority influence. , 1988 .

[49]  M. Diehl,et al.  Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. , 1987 .

[50]  I. Janis,et al.  Decision Making during International Crises , 1987 .

[51]  J. Hackman,et al.  The design of work teams , 1987 .

[52]  Brian R. Taylor.  The pooling of unshared information during group discussion , 1987 .

[53]  Thomas R. Hensley,et al.  Victims of Groupthink , 1986 .

[54]  P. R. Laughlin,et al.  Demonstrability and social combination processes on mathematical intellective tasks. , 1986 .

[55]  Richard A. Guzzo,et al.  Implicit theories and the evaluation of group process and performance , 1986 .

[56]  J. Hackman,et al.  Leading groups in organizations , 1986 .

[57]  Dennis S. Gouran,et al.  A critical analysis of factors related to decisional processes involved in the challenger disaster , 1986 .

[58]  Randy Hirokawa.  Discussion Procedures and Decision-Making Performance: A Test of a Functional Perspective. , 1985 .

[59]  G. Stasser,et al.  Pooling of Unshared Information in Group Decision Making: Biased Information Sampling During Discussion , 1985 .

[60]  Dennis S. Gouran.  Communicative influences on decisions related to the watergate coverup: The failure of collective judgment , 1984 .

[61]  Randy Hirokawa,et al.  Group communication and problem‐solving effectiveness II: An exploratory investigation of procedural functions , 1983 .

[62]  Randy Hirokawa,et al.  Group communication and problem‐solving effectiveness I: A critical review of inconsistent findings , 1982 .

[63]  I. Janis.  Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascoes , 1982 .

[64]  D. Morgan,et al.  Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis. , 1983 .

[65]  S. Kiesler.  Interpersonal processes in groups and organizations , 1978 .

[66]  Thomas J. Allen,et al.  Managing the flow of technology: technology transfer and the dissemination of technological informat , 1977 .

[67]  I. Janis,et al.  Decision Making: A Psychological Analysis of Conflict, Choice, and Commitment , 1977 .

[68]  R. Bray,et al.  The empirical study of decision processes in juries: A critical review , 1976 .

[69]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  Attribution of the "causes" of performance: A general alternative interpretation of cross-sectional research on organizations. , 1975 .

[70]  J. Hackman,et al.  Group tasks, group interaction process, and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integration , 1975 .

[71]  J. H. Davis.  Group decision and social interaction: A theory of social decision schemes. , 1973 .

[72]  A. Osborn.  Your creative power: How to use imagination , 1972 .

[73]  J. H. Davis.  Individual-group problem solving, subject preference, and problem type. , 1969, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[74]  Selwyn W. Becker,et al.  Organization Structure and Complex Problem Solving , 1969 .

[75]  M. Nicholson.  The Resolution of Conflict , 1967 .

[76]  C. Perrow.  A FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ORGANIZATIONS , 1967 .

[77]  Dorwin Cartwright,et al.  Group dynamics: Research and theory, 2nd ed. , 1960 .

[78]  Harold Guetzkow,et al.  An Analysis of Conflict in Decision-Making Groups , 1954 .

[79]  L. Festinger.  A Theory of Social Comparison Processes , 1954 .

[80]  A. Zander,et al.  Group dynamics, research and theory , 1955 .

[81]  Wesley H. Osterberg.  Interaction process analysis. , 1951 .

[82]  L. A. Hausman.  How we Think , 1921 .