A Precise and Efficient Methodology to Analyse the Shoreline Displacement Rate

Abstract The shoreline change rate is one of the most significant parameters in analysing sandy shore behaviour with time. This parameter can be monitored by means of low- and high-resolution survey methods, depending on the objectives of the monitoring programme. Survey efficiency is also very important for achieving high resolution in both space and time. Another important aspect is the precision and significance of the obtained results, not only from the survey method itself but also from the comparative analysis used to process the data from several surveys. The survey method and the processing algorithms are the basis of shoreline analysis. This paper presents an evaluation of two proposed high-resolution methods that are simultaneously highly accurate and very efficient. These methods are based on a global positioning system (GPS) in differential mode for surveying and on novel algorithms for assessing the spatial change rate of the shoreline. The most significant difference of the two presented survey systems is the physical support: whereas one uses a land vehicle (motor-quad) to delineate the shoreline in wide straight coastal stretches, the other considers an on-foot simplified version to survey small, more irregular stretches. The analysis of the error associated with the proposed methodologies is thoroughly described in this paper. In both modes of operation, system-inherent errors are within the centimetre level—in general lower than 0.05 m. Operation-specific errors can remain within the centimetre level, but if instrument handling is careless in the on-foot survey method, they can reach decimetre levels. If successive monitoring surveys are not carried out under similar field morphological conditions, when the frontal dune baseline is adopted as a shoreline indicator, rough errors can be introduced. Two case studies of the application of these methods, evaluating the shoreline evolution of two distinct coastal regions in Portugal, are presented.

[1]  Nicholas C Kraus,et al.  Beach Erosional Hot Spots: Types, Causes, and Solutions , 2001 .

[2]  Ian L. Turner,et al.  CZM Applications of Argus Coastal Imaging at the Gold Coast, Australia , 2004 .

[3]  C. Houser,et al.  Controls on coastal dune morphology, shoreline erosion and barrier island response to extreme storms , 2008 .

[4]  L. Wright,et al.  Morphodynamic variability of surf zones and beaches: A synthesis , 1984 .

[5]  Ian L Turner,et al.  Shoreline Definition and Detection: A Review , 2005 .

[6]  S. Leatherman,et al.  The High Water Line as Shoreline Indicator , 2002 .

[7]  J. Andrew G. Cooper,et al.  Morphological Monitoring of a High Energy Beach System Using GPS and Total Station Techniques, Runkerry, Co. Antrim, Northern Ireland , 2002, Journal of Coastal Research.

[8]  L. Bastos,et al.  Monitoring Sandy Shores Morphologies by DGPS—A Practical Tool to Generate Digital Elevation Models , 2008 .

[9]  George L. Smith,et al.  Calculating Long-Term Shoreline Recession Rates Using Aerial Photographic and Beach Profiling Techniques , 1990 .

[10]  Bruce Parker,et al.  The Difficulties in Measuring a Consistently Defined Shoreline? The Problem of Vertical Referencing , 2002 .

[11]  Michele Capobianco,et al.  Shoreline evolution of the Holland coast on a decadal scale , 1999 .

[12]  Peter Ruggiero,et al.  Comparing Mean High Water and High Water Line Shorelines: Should Proxy-Datum Offsets be Incorporated into Shoreline Change Analysis? , 2006 .

[13]  Aloysius Wehr,et al.  Airborne laser scanning—an introduction and overview , 1999 .

[14]  S. Leatherman,et al.  Historical Shoreline Change: Error Analysis and Mapping Accuracy , 1991 .

[15]  Mark P. Leach,et al.  Monitoring beach changes using GPS surveying techniques , 1993 .

[16]  Amy S. Farris,et al.  Reversing storm hotspots on sandy beaches: Spatial and temporal characteristics , 2006 .

[17]  Paulo Baptista,et al.  O sistema de posicionamento global aplicado ao estudo de litorais arenosos , 2006 .