Modularity and attention

Abstract There is abundant evidence that the visual information-processing systems of higher animals are modular systems-systems consisting of relatively isolated networks of neurons that take the visual world apart (for example, Felleman & Van Essen, 1991, for an overview). Within contemporary psychology this modularity is often seen as a problem that requires a solution. The problem is: How does the brain put together all these different activities to produce a unified picture, so that, for example, for any object the right colour is associated with the right shape? The solution is that focal attention integrates the initially separable features in unitary objects. In this contribution the opposite point of view is defended-not modularity as a problem solved by attention, but attention as a problem solved by modularity. The starting-point is that contemporary experimental psychology has to explain observed behaviour, not visual perception as a subjective experience. In these explanations the theoretical...

[1]  D. Broadbent.  Perception and communication , 1958 .

[2]  Donald E. Broadbent,et al.  Decision and stress , 1971 .

[3]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Attention and Effort , 1973 .

[4]  M. S. Mayzner,et al.  Cognition And Reality , 1976 .

[5]  T Bachmann,et al.  Integration and Interruption in the Masking of Form by Form , 1976, Perception.

[6]  A. Treisman.  Focused attention in the perception and retrieval of multidimensional stimuli , 1977 .

[7]  Howard S. Hoffman,et al.  A motion-induced breakdown of visual figure-ground relationships , 1978 .

[8]  O. Creutzfeldt.  Neurophysiological mechanisms and consciousness. , 1979, Ciba Foundation symposium.

[9]  M. Claggett,et al.  A Behavioral Approach , 1980 .

[10]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[11]  C W Eriksen,et al.  The use of a visual mask may seriously confound your experiment , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[12]  B. Bridgeman,et al.  Segregation of cognitive and motor aspects of visual function using induced motion , 1981, Perception & psychophysics.

[13]  H B Barlow,et al.  The Ferrier lecture, 1980 , 1981, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[14]  M. Jeannerod.  Specialized channels for cognitive responses , 1981, Cognition.

[15]  M. Jeannerod.  Intersegmental coordination during reaching at natural visual objects , 1981 .

[16]  Leslie G. Ungerleider.  Two cortical visual systems , 1982 .

[17]  A. Treisman,et al.  Illusory conjunctions in the perception of objects , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[18]  A. Treisman.  Perceptual grouping and attention in visual search for features and for objects. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[19]  A. Lovie.  Attention and behaviourism — fact and fiction , 1983 .

[20]  P. F. Secord,et al.  Implications for psychology of the new philosophy of science. , 1983 .

[21]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Object vision and spatial vision: two cortical pathways , 1983, Trends in Neurosciences.

[22]  J. Marshall.  Multiple perspectives on modularity , 1984, Cognition.

[23]  H. Egeth,et al.  Is meaning implicated in illusory conjunctions? , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[24]  F. Crick.  Function of the thalamic reticular complex: the searchlight hypothesis. , 1984, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  S. Palmer,et al.  The information processing approach to cognition , 1984 .

[26]  J. Fodor.  Précis of The Modularity of Mind , 1985, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[27]  Odmar Neumann,et al.  Die Hypothese begrenzter Kapazität und die Funktionen der Aufmerksamkeit , 1985 .

[28]  H. Barlow.  The Twelfth Bartlett Memorial Lecture: The Role of Single Neurons in the Psychology of Perception , 1985, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[29]  R. Amundson.  Psychology and epistemology: The place versus response controversy , 1985, Cognition.

[30]  Odmar Neumann,et al.  Perspektiven der Kognitionspsychologie , 1985 .

[31]  Ken Nakayama,et al.  Serial and parallel processing of visual feature conjunctions , 1986, Nature.

[32]  A. H. C. Heijden,et al.  Visual selective attention: Introductory remarks , 1986, Psychological research.

[33]  D A Allport,et al.  Perceptual integration of identity, location and colour , 1986, Psychological research.

[34]  Dominic W. Massaro,et al.  The computer as a metaphor for psychological inquiry: Considerations and recommendations , 1986 .

[35]  M. Posner,et al.  Does attention affect visual feature integration? , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[36]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  Physiological Evidence for Two Visual Subsystems , 1987 .

[37]  S W Keele,et al.  Tests of a temporal theory of attentional binding. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[38]  D. C. Van Essen,et al.  Concurrent processing streams in monkey visual cortex , 1988, Trends in Neurosciences.

[39]  A. Treisman.  Features and Objects: The Fourteenth Bartlett Memorial Lecture , 1988, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[40]  M. Livingstone.  Art, illusion and the visual system. , 1988, Scientific American.

[41]  Y Tsal,et al.  Attending to color and shape: The special role of location in selective visual processing , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[42]  S. Shipp,et al.  The functional logic of cortical connections , 1988, Nature.

[43]  D. Hubel,et al.  Segregation of form, color, movement, and depth: anatomy, physiology, and perception. , 1988, Science.

[44]  Charles Folk,et al.  Spatial parallelism in the processing of lines, letters, and lexicality. , 1989 .

[45]  Y. Tsal.  Do Illusory Conjunctions Support the Feature Integration Theory? A Critical Review of Theory and Findings , 1989 .

[46]  Allen Allport,et al.  Visual attention , 1989 .

[47]  J. Duncan,et al.  Visual search and stimulus similarity. , 1989, Psychological review.

[48]  Jon Driver,et al.  On the nonselectivity of "selective" seeing: Contrasts between interference and priming in selective attention. , 1989 .

[49]  B. Keysar,et al.  Functional theory of illusory conjunctions and neon colors. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[50]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  Influence of scene-based properties on visual search. , 1990, Science.

[51]  D. Navon.  Does attention serve to integrate features , 1990 .

[52]  C. Bundesen.  A theory of visual attention. , 1990, Psychological review.

[53]  A. V. D. Heijden,et al.  The information-processing approach , 1990, Psychological research.

[54]  C. Koch,et al.  Towards a neurobiological theory of consciousness , 1990 .

[55]  R. H. Phaf,et al.  SLAM: A connectionist model for attention in visual selection tasks , 1990, Cognitive Psychology.

[56]  A. V. D. Heijden,et al.  Visual Information Processing and Selection , 1990 .

[57]  O. Neumann.  Visual Attention and Action , 1990 .

[58]  M. Nissen,et al.  Attentional processing and the independence of color and orientation. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[59]  Marc Green,et al.  Visual search, visual streams, and visual architectures , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[60]  P. Goldman-Rakic,et al.  Preface: Cerebral Cortex Has Come of Age , 1991 .

[61]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  Preattentive recovery of three-dimensional orientation from line drawings. , 1991, Psychological review.

[62]  C Bundesen,et al.  Visual selection of features and objects: Is location special? A reinterpretation of Nissen’s (1985) findings , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[63]  A. H. C. van der Heijden,et al.  Selective Attention in Vision , 1991 .

[64]  CONSCIOUSNESS, QUALIA, AND REENTRANT SIGNALLING , 1991 .

[65]  D. J. Felleman,et al.  Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex. , 1991, Cerebral cortex.

[66]  A Cohen,et al.  Density effects in conjunction search: evidence for a coarse location mechanism of feature integration. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[67]  M. Goodale,et al.  Separate visual pathways for perception and action , 1992, Trends in Neurosciences.

[68]  S. Zeki.  The visual image in mind and brain. , 1992, Scientific American.

[69]  B. Bridgeman.  Conscious vs Unconscious Processes , 1992 .

[70]  I. Biederman,et al.  Dynamic binding in a neural network for shape recognition. , 1992, Psychological review.

[71]  Irving Biederman,et al.  From image edges to geons to viewpoint-invariant object models: a neural net implementation , 1992, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[72]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  Visual response latencies in striate cortex of the macaque monkey. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[73]  Wolfgang Prinz,et al.  Why don't we perceive our brain states? , 1992 .

[74]  C. Koch,et al.  The problem of consciousness. , 1992, Scientific American.

[75]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  Mixed parvocellular and magnocellular geniculate signals in visual area V4 , 1992, Nature.

[76]  D. Mewhort,et al.  Representation and selection of relative position. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[77]  Y. Tsal,et al.  Location dominance in attending to color and shape. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[78]  A. H. C. van der Heijden,et al.  The role of position in object selection in vision , 1993 .

[79]  M. Goodale,et al.  Chapter 28 Visual pathways to perception and action , 1993 .

[80]  M. Jeannerod.  The representing brain: Neural correlates of motor intention and imagery , 1994, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[81]  G. Logan.  Linguistic and Conceptual Control of Visual Spatial Attention , 1995, Cognitive Psychology.