Information transfer by leaky, heterogeneous, protein kinase signaling systems

Significance Extracellular concentrations convey information to cells about their environment. To sense these signals, cells use biomolecular networks that exhibit inevitable cell-to-cell variability and basal activity. Basal activity is widespread under physiological conditions (with phenotypic consequences), is often raised in disease, and can eradicate the transfer of information. In an experimental study of ERK signaling by single cells exhibiting heterogeneous ERK expression and basal activity, we verify our central theoretical prediction: Negative feedback substantially increases information transfer to the nucleus by preventing a near-flat average response curve and reducing sensitivity to variation in the ERK expression level. Our results reveal an important role for negative feedback mechanisms in protecting information transfer by saturable cell signaling systems from basal activity. Cells must sense extracellular signals and transfer the information contained about their environment reliably to make appropriate decisions. To perform these tasks, cells use signal transduction networks that are subject to various sources of noise. Here, we study the effects on information transfer of two particular types of noise: basal (leaky) network activity and cell-to-cell variability in the componentry of the network. Basal activity is the propensity for activation of the network output in the absence of the signal of interest. We show, using theoretical models of protein kinase signaling, that the combined effect of the two types of noise makes information transfer by such networks highly vulnerable to the loss of negative feedback. In an experimental study of ERK signaling by single cells with heterogeneous ERK expression levels, we verify our theoretical prediction: In the presence of basal network activity, negative feedback substantially increases information transfer to the nucleus by both preventing a near-flat average response curve and reducing sensitivity to variation in substrate expression levels. The interplay between basal network activity, heterogeneity in network componentry, and feedback is thus critical for the effectiveness of protein kinase signaling. Basal activity is widespread in signaling systems under physiological conditions, has phenotypic consequences, and is often raised in disease. Our results reveal an important role for negative feedback mechanisms in protecting the information transfer function of saturable, heterogeneous cell signaling systems from basal activity.

[1]  Shinya Kuroda,et al.  Robustness and Compensation of Information Transmission of Signaling Pathways , 2013, Science.

[2]  Clive G. Bowsher,et al.  Signaling to Extracellular Signal-regulated Kinase from ErbB1 Kinase and Protein Kinase C , 2013, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[3]  Peter S. Swain,et al.  The Fidelity of Dynamic Signaling by Noisy Biomolecular Networks , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[4]  M. Mohammadi,et al.  Grb2, a Double-Edged Sword of Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Signaling , 2012, Science Signaling.

[5]  R. Cheong,et al.  How Information Theory Handles Cell Signaling and Uncertainty , 2012, Science.

[6]  Christina Kiel,et al.  Challenges ahead in signal transduction: MAPK as an example. , 2012, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[7]  Margaritis Voliotis,et al.  The magnitude and colour of noise in genetic negative feedback systems , 2012, Nucleic acids research.

[8]  Krasimira Tsaneva-Atanasova,et al.  Dual specificity phosphatases 10 and 16 are positive regulators of EGF-stimulated ERK activity: Indirect regulation of ERK signals by JNK/p38 selective MAPK phosphatases , 2012, Cellular signalling.

[9]  S. Arold,et al.  Noise in cellular signaling pathways: causes and effects. , 2012, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[10]  Clive G. Bowsher,et al.  Identifying sources of variation and the flow of information in biochemical networks , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  I. Nemenman Gain control in molecular information processing: lessons from neuroscience , 2011, Physical biology.

[12]  Uri Alon,et al.  Negative auto-regulation increases the input dynamic-range of the arabinose system of Escherichia coli , 2011, BMC Systems Biology.

[13]  Nils Blüthgen,et al.  Strong negative feedback from Erk to Raf confers robustness to MAPK signalling , 2011, Molecular systems biology.

[14]  A. Oudenaarden,et al.  Cellular Decision Making and Biological Noise: From Microbes to Mammals , 2011, Cell.

[15]  Clive G. Bowsher,et al.  Information processing by biochemical networks: a dynamic approach , 2011, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[16]  Muffy Calder,et al.  The Mammalian MAPK/ERK Pathway Exhibits Properties of a Negative Feedback Amplifier , 2010, Science Signaling.

[17]  C. McArdle,et al.  Stimulus-induced uncoupling of extracellular signal-regulated kinase phosphorylation from nuclear localization is dependent on docking domain interactions , 2010, Journal of Cell Science.

[18]  P. Swain,et al.  Strategies for cellular decision-making , 2009, Molecular systems biology.

[19]  R. Nussinov,et al.  The role of dynamic conformational ensembles in biomolecular recognition. , 2009, Nature chemical biology.

[20]  R. Toillon,et al.  TrkA overexpression enhances growth and metastasis of breast cancer cells , 2009, Oncogene.

[21]  P. Sorger,et al.  Non-genetic origins of cell-to-cell variability in TRAIL-induced apoptosis , 2009, Nature.

[22]  G. Balázsi,et al.  Negative autoregulation linearizes the dose–response and suppresses the heterogeneity of gene expression , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  Ricard Solé,et al.  Dynamic Signaling in the Hog1 MAPK Pathway Relies on High Basal Signal Transduction , 2009, Science Signaling.

[24]  Ned S Wingreen,et al.  Information processing and signal integration in bacterial quorum sensing , 2009, Molecular systems biology.

[25]  C. Sander,et al.  V600EBRAF is associated with disabled feedback inhibition of RAF–MEK signaling and elevated transcriptional output of the pathway , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  R. Germain,et al.  Variability and Robustness in T Cell Activation from Regulated Heterogeneity in Protein Levels , 2008, Science.

[27]  J. Ching Lee Modulation of allostery of pyruvate kinase by shifting of an ensemble of microstates. , 2008, Acta biochimica et biophysica Sinica.

[28]  Wei Chen,et al.  Differential regulation and properties of MAPKs , 2007, Oncogene.

[29]  O. Rath,et al.  MAP kinase signalling pathways in cancer , 2007, Oncogene.

[30]  P. Swain,et al.  Noisy information processing through transcriptional regulation , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  R. Milo,et al.  Variability and memory of protein levels in human cells , 2006, Nature.

[32]  C. McArdle,et al.  Seven-transmembrane receptor signalling and ERK compartmentalization , 2006, Trends in Endocrinology & Metabolism.

[33]  C. McArdle,et al.  Arrestin-mediated ERK Activation by Gonadotropin-releasing Hormone Receptors , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[34]  A. IJzerman,et al.  Recent developments in constitutive receptor activity and inverse agonism, and their potential for GPCR drug discovery. , 2006, Trends in pharmacological sciences.

[35]  Todd R. Golub,et al.  BRAF mutation predicts sensitivity to MEK inhibition , 2006, Nature.

[36]  Thomas M. Cover,et al.  Elements of Information Theory , 2005 .

[37]  A. Kraskov,et al.  Estimating mutual information. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[38]  A. Nicholson,et al.  Mutations of the BRAF gene in human cancer , 2002, Nature.

[39]  E. Gilles,et al.  Computational modeling of the dynamics of the MAP kinase cascade activated by surface and internalized EGF receptors , 2002, Nature Biotechnology.

[40]  J. Ferrell Self-perpetuating states in signal transduction: positive feedback, double-negative feedback and bistability. , 2002, Current opinion in cell biology.

[41]  Anirvan M. Sengupta,et al.  Engineering aspects of enzymatic signal transduction: photoreceptors in the retina. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[42]  M. Ehrenberg,et al.  Fluctuations and quality of control in biological cells: zero-order ultrasensitivity reinvestigated. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[43]  S. Keyse,et al.  Protein phosphatases and the regulation of mitogen-activated protein kinase signalling. , 2000, Current opinion in cell biology.

[44]  M. Peppelenbosch,et al.  The role of phosphatidylinositide‐3‐kinase in basal mitogen‐activated protein kinase activity and cell survival , 2000, FEBS letters.

[45]  M. Pagano,et al.  Activation of Protein Kinase C Triggers Its Ubiquitination and Degradation , 1998, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[46]  C. Marshall,et al.  Specificity of receptor tyrosine kinase signaling: Transient versus sustained extracellular signal-regulated kinase activation , 1995, Cell.

[47]  J. Blenis,et al.  Nuclear localization and regulation of erk- and rsk-encoded protein kinases , 1992, Molecular and cellular biology.

[48]  D. Koshland,et al.  An amplified sensitivity arising from covalent modification in biological systems. , 1981, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[49]  J. Bernardo Expected Information as Expected Utility , 1979 .

[50]  Ilya Nemenman,et al.  Networks Information Transduction Capacity of Noisy Biochemical Signaling , 2011 .

[51]  D. Beard,et al.  Chemical Biophysics: Conventions and calculations for biochemical systems , 2008 .

[52]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[53]  J. Licht,et al.  Sprouty proteins: multifaceted negative-feedback regulators of receptor tyrosine kinase signaling. , 2006, Trends in cell biology.