Superimposed Information Architecture for Digital Libraries

A variety of software tools commonly used in research and industry allow a user to select (usually contiguous) segments of content to be annotated, referenced, or otherwise distinguished from a containing document. However, digital libraries (DLs) often curate only full documents, not these selected sub-documents. Thus, sub-documents in a DL may not have the full complement of metadata, and they may not be visible using DL browse and search facilities. We are interested in explicit representation of sub-documents in a DL environment. In this paper, we show how sub-documents may be represented and curated. We focus on the explicit representation of what we call a mark- an encapsulated address of a sub-document along with associated context. Our contributions are: a software architecture for representing marks as first-class objects together with regular documents in a DL; and an implementation of our architecture using existing software packages with modest enhancements. This approach provides new capabilities for the DL with minimal modification to tools and interfaces familiar to the DL user.

[1]  Frank M. Shipman,et al.  Digital Libraries: Issues and Architectures , 1995, DL.

[2]  Catherine C. Marshall,et al.  Annotation: from paper books to the digital library , 1997, DL '97.

[3]  Lois M. L. Delcambre,et al.  Superimposed Information for the Internet , 1999, WebDB.

[4]  David Wiley,et al.  Connecting learning objects to instructional design theory: A definition, a metaphor, and a taxonomy , 2000 .

[5]  David A. Wiley,et al.  The Instructional Use of Learning Objects: Online Version , 2000 .

[6]  Robert Wilensky,et al.  Robust intra-document locations , 2000, Comput. Networks.

[7]  Robert Wilensky,et al.  The multivalent browser: a platform for new ideas , 2001, DocEng '01.

[8]  Lois M. L. Delcambre,et al.  Bundles in captivity: an application of superimposed information , 2001, Proceedings 17th International Conference on Data Engineering.

[9]  Nicola Ferro,et al.  Annotations in Digital Libraries and Collaboratories - Facets, Models and Usage , 2004, ECDL.

[10]  Andruid Kerne,et al.  Using Composition to Re-Present Personal Collections of Hypersigns , 2004 .

[11]  Claus Pahl,et al.  A web services architecture for learning object discovery and assembly , 2004, WWW Alt. '04.

[12]  Lois M. L. Delcambre,et al.  Putting Integrated Information in Context: Superimposing Conceptual Models with SPARCE , 2004, APCCM.

[13]  Stefano Levialdi,et al.  MADCOW: a multimedia digital annotation system , 2004, AVI.

[14]  Sandra Payette,et al.  Fedora: an architecture for complex objects and their relationships , 2005, International Journal on Digital Libraries.

[15]  Andrew M. Webb,et al.  combinFormation: a mixed-initiative system for representing collections as compositions of image and text surrogates , 2006, Proceedings of the 6th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL '06).

[16]  Kim A. Kastens,et al.  Using Annotations to Add Value to a Digital Library for Education , 2006, D Lib Mag..

[17]  Lois M. L. Delcambre,et al.  Semantic components enhance retrieval of domain-specific documents , 2007, CIKM '07.

[18]  Fabio Corubolo,et al.  Location and Format Independent Distributed Annotations for Collaborative Research , 2007, ECDL.

[19]  Nicola Ferro,et al.  A formal model of annotations of digital content , 2007, TOIS.

[20]  Claudio Gennaro,et al.  Automatic metadata extraction and indexing for reusing e-learning multimedia objects , 2007, MS '07.

[21]  Megan A. Winget Annotation functionality for digital libraries supporting collaborative performance: an example of musical scores , 2007, JCDL '07.

[22]  Stuart Macdonald,et al.  User Engagement in Research Data Curation , 2009, ECDL.

[23]  Lora Aroyo,et al.  The Semantic Web: Research and Applications , 2009, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.