Relationship building and the use of ICT in boundary-crossing virtual teams: a facilitator's perspective

Global virtual teams are playing an increasingly important role in international business by offering organizations the opportunity for reaching beyond traditional boundaries. However, their use has outpaced our understanding of their dynamics and unique characteristics. For example, global, multicultural, interorganizational, virtual teams and the effective use of information and communication technologies (ICTs) present real and compelling challenges to facilitators, but they also present teams with unparalleled opportunities for expanding on perspectives, approaches and ideas. However, crossing organizational, cultural and time and distance boundaries requires training, experience and organizational support. While research shows that the development of personal relationships between virtual team members is an important factor in effective working relationships, little research has been conducted on the effects of crossing organizational, cultural and time and distance boundaries on relationship building in virtual teams. This paper reports on a field study of New Zealand-based virtual team facilitators working with boundary-spanning virtual teams. From a facilitator's perspective, boundary-crossing issues (organizational, cultural, language and time and distance) can affect relationship building in many important ways. For instance, facilitators found that organizational boundary crossing was affected by differing organizational cultures and policies, while working across cultures required awareness and adjustment in relationship-building expectations and strategies. Crossing time and distance barriers necessitated the skilful use of synchronous and asynchronous ICTs and communication channels. These findings will be explored and the implications for practice and research will also be discussed.

[1]  R. Revans The Origins and Growth of Action Learning , 1982 .

[2]  Francis Y. Lau,et al.  Toward a framework for action research in information systems studies , 1999, Inf. Technol. People.

[3]  Pak Yoong,et al.  Action learning and groupware technologies: a case study in GSS facilitation research , 2001, Inf. Technol. People.

[4]  Pamela Jordan Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques , 1994 .

[5]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Electronic meeting systems , 1991, CACM.

[6]  Thomas A. Finholt,et al.  Electronic Groups at Work. , 1990 .

[7]  Deborah L. Duarte,et al.  Mastering Virtual Teams , 2000 .

[8]  Edgar H. Schein,et al.  Coming to a new awareness of organizational culture , 1984 .

[9]  C. Cramton Attribution in distributed work groups. , 2002 .

[10]  Richard D. Lewis When Cultures Collide: Managing Successfully Across Cultures , 1996 .

[11]  Jan Pries-Heje,et al.  Grounded action research: a method for understanding IT in practice , 1999 .

[12]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Knowledge Creating Company , 2008 .

[13]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Lessons from a Dozen Years of Group Support Systems Research: A Discussion of Lab and Field Findings , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[14]  Merrill Warkentin,et al.  Virtual Teams versus Face-to-Face Teams: An Exploratory Study of a Web-based Conference System* , 1997 .

[15]  N. Adler International Dimensions of Organizational Behavior , 1986 .

[16]  B. Glaser Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances in the Methodology of Grounded Theory , 1978 .

[17]  John A Scigliano,et al.  Mastering Virtual Teams: Strategies, Tools, and Techniques that Succeed: Deborah L. Duarte and Nancy Tennant Snyder. (2000). 2nd ed., San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 256 pages. ISBN: 0-7879-5589-2W01. US$39.95, includes a CD-ROM , 1999, Internet High. Educ..

[18]  JoAnne Yates,et al.  Shaping Electronic Communication: The Metastructuring of Technology in the Context of Use , 1995 .

[19]  Ton van der Smagt Enhancing virtual teams: social relations v. communication technology , 2000, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[20]  Eileen M. Trauth,et al.  Understanding Computer-Mediated Discussions: Positivist and Interpretive Analyses of Group Support System Use , 2000, MIS Q..

[21]  Joe Nandhakumar,et al.  Virtual teams and lost proximity : Consequences on trust relationships , 2002 .

[22]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[23]  D. Dunn,et al.  Experiential Learning , 2019, High Impact Teaching for Sport and Exercise Psychology Educators.

[24]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams , 1999, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[25]  M. Maznevski,et al.  Bridging Space Over Time: Global Virtual Team Dynamics and Effectiveness , 2000 .

[26]  Suprateek Sarker,et al.  Building an inductive theory of collaboration in virtual teams: an adapted grounded theory approach , 2000, Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[27]  David J. Pauleen,et al.  Facilitating virtual team relationships via Internet and conventional communication channels , 2001, Internet Res..

[28]  David G. Schwartz,et al.  When email meets organizational memories: addressing threats to communication in a learning organization , 1999, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[29]  Abhijit Gopal,et al.  Understanding GDSS in Symbolic Context: Shifting the Focus from Technology to Interaction , 2000, MIS Q..

[30]  Merrill Warkentin,et al.  Training to improve virtual team communication , 1999, Inf. Syst. J..

[31]  Daniel Robey,et al.  Situated learning in cross-functional virtual teams , 2000 .

[32]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. , 1992 .

[33]  Timothy R. Kayworth,et al.  The global virtual manager: a prescription for success , 2000 .

[34]  S. P. Yoong Action learning: preparing workers for the international office of the future , 1996 .

[35]  Fred Niederman,et al.  Issues and Concerns About Computer-Supported Meetings: The Facilitator's Perspective , 1996, MIS Q..

[36]  Raghu Garud,et al.  Communication Patterns as Determinants of Organizational Identification in a Virtual Organization , 1999, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[37]  A. Strauss Basics Of Qualitative Research , 1992 .

[38]  William J. Kettinger,et al.  The Use of Computer‐mediated Communication in an Interorganizational Context , 1997 .

[39]  E. Goffman The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life , 1959 .

[40]  Keri E. Pearlson,et al.  Two Cheers for the Virtual Office , 1998 .

[41]  L. N. Karlovic,et al.  Fostering Critical Reflection in Adulthood: A Guide to Transformative and Emancipatory Learning. Jack Mezirow. 1990. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. , 1992, Canadian Journal for the Study of Adult Education.

[42]  J. Walther,et al.  Relational communication in computer-mediated interaction , 1990 .

[43]  V. Marsick,et al.  The Many Faces of Action Learning , 1999 .

[44]  Anthony R. Hendrickson,et al.  Virtual teams: Technology and the workplace of the future , 1998 .

[45]  R. W. Root,et al.  Informal Communication in Organizations: Form, Function, and Technology , 1990 .

[46]  Charles Margerison,et al.  Action Learning and Excellence in Management Development , 1988 .

[47]  R. Boutellier,et al.  Management of Dispersed Product Development Teams: The Role of Information Technologies , 1998 .

[48]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[49]  David Coleman,et al.  Groupware: Collaborative Strategies for Corporate LANs and Intranets , 1997 .

[50]  Line Dubé,et al.  Virtual teams: an exploratory study of key challenges and strategies , 1999, ICIS.

[51]  Nigel Fielding,et al.  Using Computers in Qualitative Research , 1991 .