An energy model of interframe interval effects in single-step apparent motion

A computational model was developed to explain the effects of an interframe interval (IFI) in single-step apparent motion experiments. In these experiments a stimulus appears in one position, disappears, and then reappears in a shifted position after a short or long IFI. If the luminance during the IFI matches the mean luminance of the stimulus frames, long IFIs result in perceived motion opposite the short-IFI conditions. Brighter or darker IFIs, however, do not support the reversed motion effect. The model possess the following defining characteristics: (1) a biphasic ("transient") channel whose signalled direction of motion reverses with changes of IFI duration; (2) a combined direction-opponent output which is the sum of directional responses developed in two channels--biphasic ("transient") and monophasic ("sustained"); (3) a signal/noise weighting of the contributions of the two channels to the final directional output of the system. Predictions of the model about the effects of IFI intensity and viewing eccentricity were tested and confirmed in two new psychophysical experiments. The interpretations of past studies which included a role for second-order motion mechanisms in explaining IFI duration effects were reexamined. Further empirical tests of the model were outlined.

[1]  Scott N. J. Watamaniuk,et al.  Temporal and spatial integration in dynamic random-dot stimuli , 1992, Vision Research.

[2]  Hugh R. Wilson,et al.  Eccentricity dependence of contrast matching and oblique masking , 1985, Vision Research.

[3]  O. Braddick.  The masking of apparent motion in random-dot patterns. , 1973, Vision research.

[4]  B. Julesz.  Foundations of Cyclopean Perception , 1971 .

[5]  R. H. Blackburn.  PERCEPTION OF MOVEMENT , 1937 .

[6]  J. Robson,et al.  Probability summation and regional variation in contrast sensitivity across the visual field , 1981, Vision Research.

[7]  S. Anstis,et al.  Phi movement as a subtraction process. , 1970, Vision research.

[8]  A. Pantle,et al.  Physiological Basis of Motion Perception , 1978 .

[9]  G. Sperling,et al.  Drift-balanced random stimuli: a general basis for studying non-Fourier motion perception. , 1988, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[10]  A Pantle,et al.  A multistable movement display: evidence for two separate motion systems in human vision. , 1976, Science.

[11]  M. Sanders.  Handbook of Sensory Physiology , 1975 .

[12]  Mark A. Georgeson,et al.  The temporal range of motion sensing and motion perception , 1990, Vision Research.

[13]  J. Robson,et al.  Application of fourier analysis to the visibility of gratings , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[14]  O. Braddick.  A short-range process in apparent motion. , 1974, Vision research.

[15]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  ISI produces reverse apparent motion , 1990, Vision Research.

[16]  O J Braddick,et al.  Low-level and high-level processes in apparent motion. , 1980, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[17]  Allan Pantle,et al.  Visual resolution of motion ambiguity with periodic luminance- and contrast-domain stimuli , 1992, Vision Research.

[18]  D. Tolhurst,et al.  Psychophysical evidence for sustained and transient detectors in human vision , 1973, The Journal of physiology.

[19]  E H Adelson,et al.  Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[20]  G. Legge.  Sustained and transient mechanisms in human vision: Temporal and spatial properties , 1978, Vision Research.

[21]  Frans A. J. Verstraten,et al.  Spatio-temporal characteristics of human motion perception , 1993, Vision Research.

[22]  Petersik Jt.  The two-process distinction in apparent motion. , 1989 .

[23]  Curtis L. Baker,et al.  Dependence on stimulus onset asynchrony in apparent motion: Evidence for two mechanisms , 1993, Vision Research.

[24]  J. Robson.  Spatial and Temporal Contrast-Sensitivity Functions of the Visual System , 1966 .