Effects of income and social awareness on consumer WTP for social product attributes

Abstract Recent developments in environmental and animal welfare issues, and the introduction of new production practices may have affected consumer attitudes and preferences toward differentiated product choice. Factors such as animal well-being, environmentally friendly production, and the use of antibiotics appear to be increasingly core consumer concerns. We link the aforementioned with Maslow's hierarchy of needs suggesting that the higher income consumers should be more altruistic in their consumptive behavior and test this by evaluating consumer preferences for these attributes in pork chops. We also test whether social consciousness of the consumers translates into choice behavior. Data was obtained by choice experiment surveys and mixed logit estimation was used to estimate consumers' willingness-to-pay for the credence attributes. Results reveal that both, higher income and socially aware consumers are on average willing to pay higher premiums for the antibiotic-free attribute, but not for other two social attributes. Also, the group of higher income consumers is highly heterogeneous in their preferences, whereas socially aware consumers tend to be more homogeneous in their preferences.

[1]  T. L. Osterhus Pro-Social Consumer Influence Strategies: When and how do they Work? , 1997 .

[2]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  What Will Consumers Pay for Social Product Features? , 2003 .

[3]  Wuyang Hu,et al.  Trading off health, environmental and genetic modification attributes in food , 2004 .

[4]  Michael A. Kamins,et al.  Effects of Information About Firms’ Ethical and Unethical Actions on Consumers’ Attitudes , 1999 .

[5]  J. Adrian,et al.  Impact of Socioeconomic Factors on Consumption of Selected Food Nutrients in the United States , 1976 .

[6]  John M. Rose,et al.  Using Classical Simulation-Based Estimators to Estimate Individual WTP Values , 2005 .

[7]  K. Lancaster A New Approach to Consumer Theory , 1966, Journal of Political Economy.

[8]  Wiktor L. Adamowicz,et al.  What's it Worth? An Examination of Historical Trends and Future Directions in Environmental Valuation , 2004 .

[9]  J. Lusk,et al.  Public Preferences and Private Choices: Effect of Altruism and Free Riding on Demand for Environmentally Certified Pork , 2007 .

[10]  Elisabetta Strazzera,et al.  Modeling Elicitation effects in contingent valuation studies: a Monte Carlo Analysis of the bivariate approach , 2005 .

[11]  J. Lusk,et al.  Marketing Opportunities for Certified Pork Chops , 2006 .

[12]  W. Huffman Consumers' Acceptance of (and Resistance to) Genetically Modified Foods in High-Income Countries: Effects of Labels and Information in an Uncertain Environment , 2003 .

[13]  D. Hensher,et al.  Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications , 2000 .

[14]  T. Schroeder,et al.  In‐Store Valuation of Steak Tenderness , 2001 .

[15]  Jutta Roosen,et al.  Demand for Beef from Cattle Administered Growth Hormones or Fed Genetically Modified Corn: A Comparison of Consumers in France, Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States , 2003 .

[16]  K. Train Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation , 2003 .