Supporting cost-effective watershed management strategies for Chesapeake Bay using a modeling and optimization framework

Abstract Extensive efforts to adaptively manage nutrient pollution rely on Chesapeake Bay Program's (Phase 6) Watershed Model, called Chesapeake Assessment Scenario Tool (CAST), which helps decision-makers plan and track implementation of Best Management Practices (BMPs). We describe mathematical characteristics of CAST and develop a constrained nonlinear BMP-subset model, software, and visualization framework. This represents the first publicly available optimization framework for exploring least-cost strategies of pollutant load control for the United States' largest estuary. The optimization identifies implementation options for a BMP subset modeled with load reduction effectiveness factors, and the web interface facilitates interactive exploration of >30,000 solutions organized by objective, nutrient control level, and for ~200 counties. We assess framework performance and demonstrate modeled cost improvements when comparing optimization-suggested proposals with proposals inspired by jurisdiction plans. Stakeholder feedback highlights the framework's current utility for investigating cost-effective tradeoffs and its usefulness as a foundation for future analysis of restoration strategies.

[1]  Carl F. Cerco,et al.  Phytoplankton Kinetics in the Chesapeake Bay Eutrophication Model , 2000 .

[2]  Andreas Wächter,et al.  Short Tutorial: Getting Started With Ipopt in 90 Minutes , 2009, Combinatorial Scientific Computing.

[3]  P. Vadas,et al.  Estimating phosphorus loss in runoff from manure and fertilizer for a phosphorus loss quantification tool. , 2009, Journal of environmental quality.

[4]  C. Cerco.  Response of Chesapeake Bay to Nutrient Load Reductions , 1995 .

[5]  R. Lougee-Heimer,et al.  The Common Optimization INterface for Operations Research: Promoting open-source software in the operations research community , 2003 .

[6]  Jing Wu,et al.  Enhanced HSPF Model Structure for Chesapeake Bay Watershed Simulation , 2012 .

[7]  Bomi Kim,et al.  Multi-objective planning model for urban greening based on optimization algorithms , 2019, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening.

[8]  L E Cronin,et al.  Chesapeake Bay Anoxia: Origin, Development, and Significance , 1984, Science.

[9]  Jian Shen,et al.  Worsened physical condition due to climate change contributes to the increasing hypoxia in Chesapeake Bay. , 2018, The Science of the total environment.

[10]  P. Tango,et al.  Chesapeake Bay's water quality condition has been recovering: Insights from a multimetric indicator assessment of thirty years of tidal monitoring data. , 2018, The Science of the total environment.

[11]  The competing impacts of climate change and nutrient reductions on dissolved oxygen in Chesapeake Bay , 2017 .

[12]  W. Boynton,et al.  Seasonal depletion of oxygen from bottom waters of Chesapeake Bay: roles of benthic and planktonic respiration and physical exchange processes , 1992 .

[13]  Hisao Ishibuchi,et al.  Interactive Multiobjective Optimization: A Review of the State-of-the-Art , 2018, IEEE Access.

[14]  L. Shawn Matott,et al.  OSTRICH-SWMM: A new multi-objective optimization tool for green infrastructure planning with SWMM , 2019, Environ. Model. Softw..

[15]  Angelos Alamanos,et al.  Development of a Decision Support System for Sustainable Environmental Management and Stakeholder Engagement , 2021, Hydrology.

[16]  Ming Li,et al.  Large Projected Decline in Dissolved Oxygen in a Eutrophic Estuary Due to Climate Change , 2019, Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans.

[17]  Dirk Merkel,et al.  Docker: lightweight Linux containers for consistent development and deployment , 2014 .

[18]  Jared L. Cohon,et al.  Multiobjective programming and planning , 2004 .

[19]  V. Tippie,et al.  Chesapeake Bay, a framework for action , 1983 .

[20]  H. Paerl,et al.  Long-term trends, current status, and transitions of water quality in Chesapeake Bay , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[21]  Joseph R. Kasprzyk,et al.  Embedding co-production and addressing uncertainty in watershed modeling decision-support tools: Successes and challenges , 2018, Environ. Model. Softw..

[22]  Ming Li,et al.  What drives interannual variability of hypoxia in Chesapeake Bay: Climate forcing versus nutrient loading? , 2016 .

[23]  Lewis C. Linker,et al.  Development of the Chesapeake Bay Watershed Total Maximum Daily Load Allocation , 2013 .

[24]  K. Sellner,et al.  Environmental Models and Public Stakeholders in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed , 2013, Estuaries and Coasts.

[25]  Julie Thomas,et al.  Evolving and Sustaining Ocean Best Practices and Standards for the Next Decade , 2019, Front. Mar. Sci..

[26]  Lorenz T. Biegler,et al.  On the implementation of an interior-point filter line-search algorithm for large-scale nonlinear programming , 2006, Math. Program..

[27]  S. Batie,et al.  Using Spatial Information to Reduce Costs of Controlling Agricultural Nonpoint Source Pollution , 1998, Agricultural and Resource Economics Review.

[28]  E. Downey Brill,et al.  The Use of Optimization Models in Public-Sector Planning , 1979 .

[29]  C. Cerco,et al.  Twenty‐One‐Year Simulation of Chesapeake Bay Water Quality Using the CE‐QUAL‐ICM Eutrophication Model , 2013 .

[30]  P. Kitanidis,et al.  Experimental determination of transverse dispersivity in a helix and a cochlea , 2006 .

[31]  Daniel B. Taylor,et al.  Costs of Water Quality Goals under Climate Change in Urbanizing Watersheds: Difficult Run, Virginia , 2017 .

[32]  H. Paerl,et al.  Long-Term Trends of Nutrients and Phytoplankton in Chesapeake Bay , 2016, Estuaries and Coasts.

[33]  Charles ReVelle,et al.  Hidden Attributes and the Display of Information in Multiobjective Analysis , 1982 .

[34]  Cleve E. Willis,et al.  A Comparison of Generating Techniques and Goal Programming for Public Investment, Multiple Objective Decision Making , 1980 .

[35]  W. P. Ball,et al.  Long-Term Trends in Chesapeake Bay Seasonal Hypoxia, Stratification, and Nutrient Loading , 2011 .

[36]  Fred L. Drake,et al.  Python 3 Reference Manual , 2009 .

[37]  Lewis C. Linker,et al.  Computing Atmospheric Nutrient Loads to the Chesapeake Bay Watershed and Tidal Waters , 2013 .

[38]  Moges B. Wagena,et al.  Meeting Water Quality Goals by Spatial Targeting of Best Management Practices under Climate Change , 2019, Environmental Management.

[39]  D. Boesch.  Barriers and Bridges in Abating Coastal Eutrophication , 2019, Front. Mar. Sci..

[40]  Stuart S. Schwartz,et al.  Optimization and Decision Heuristics for Chesapeake Bay Nutrient Reduction Strategies , 2010 .

[41]  Andrew J. Sekellick,et al.  Toward Explaining Nitrogen and Phosphorus Trends in Chesapeake Bay Tributaries, 1992–2012 , 2019, JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association.

[42]  David L. Woodruff,et al.  Pyomo: modeling and solving mathematical programs in Python , 2011, Math. Program. Comput..

[43]  Michael R. Roman,et al.  Eutrophication of Chesapeake Bay: historical trends and ecological interactions , 2005 .

[44]  Robert M. Summers,et al.  Inputs, transformations, and transport of nitrogen and phosphorus in Chesapeake Bay and selected tributaries , 1995 .

[45]  Moges B. Wagena,et al.  Meeting Water Quality Goals under Climate Change in Chesapeake Bay Watershed, USA , 2018, JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association.

[46]  Meghna Babbar-Sebens,et al.  A web-based software tool for participatory optimization of conservation practices in watersheds , 2015, Environ. Model. Softw..

[47]  Teresa B. Culver,et al.  Robust optimization for total maximum daily load allocations , 2006 .

[48]  J. M. Landwehr,et al.  Habitat requirements for submerged aquatic vegetation in Chesapeake Bay: Water quality, light regime, and physical-chemical factors , 2004 .

[49]  James D. Hagy,et al.  Hypoxia in Chesapeake Bay, 1950–2001: Long-term change in relation to nutrient loading and river flow , 2004 .

[50]  M. Friedrichs,et al.  Impacts of Atmospheric Nitrogen Deposition and Coastal Nitrogen Fluxes on Oxygen Concentrations in Chesapeake Bay , 2018, Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans.

[51]  R. Beach,et al.  Nutrient credit trading for the Chesapeake Bay: An economic study , 2012 .

[52]  Aaron J. Bever,et al.  Combining observations and numerical model results to improve estimates of hypoxic volume within the Chesapeake Bay, USA , 2013 .

[53]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[54]  Peter Feather,et al.  Agricultural costs of the Chesapeake Bay total maximum daily load. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[55]  R. Fanelli,et al.  Phosphorus and the Chesapeake Bay: Lingering Issues and Emerging Concerns for Agriculture. , 2019, Journal of environmental quality.

[56]  Alexander Y. Sun,et al.  Development of multi-metamodels to support surface water quality management and decision making , 2014, Environmental Earth Sciences.

[57]  Olivia H. Devereux,et al.  CAST: An Online Tool for Facilitating Local Involvement in Watershed Implementation Plans for the Chesapeake Bay Total Maximum Daily Load , 2014 .

[58]  Carl F. Cerco,et al.  Management modeling of suspended solids in the Chesapeake Bay, USA , 2013 .

[59]  Carl F. Cerco,et al.  Three‐Dimensional Eutrophication Model of Chesapeake Bay , 1993 .