Computer-based grading of haematoxylin-eosin stained tissue sections of urinary bladder carcinomas.

PURPOSE A computer-based image analysis system was developed for assessing the malignancy of urinary bladder carcinomas in a more objective manner. Tumours characterized in accordance with the WHO grading system were classified into low-risk (grades I and II) and high-risk (grades III and IV). MATERIALS AND METHODS Images from 92 haematoxylin-eosin stained sections of urinary bladder carcinomas were digitized and analysed. An adequate number of nuclei were segmented from each image for morphologic and textural analysis. Image segmentation was performed by an efficient algorithm, which used pattern recognition methods to automatically characterize image pixels as nucleus or background. Image classification into low-risk or high-risk tumours was performed by means of the quadratic non-linear Bayesian classifier, which was designed employing 36 textural and morphological features of the nucleus. RESULTS Automatic segmentation of nuclei on all images was about 90% on average. Overall system accuracy in correctly classifying tumours into low-risk or high-risk was 88%, employing the leave-one-out method and the best combination of three textural and one morphological feature. Classification accuracy for low-risk tumours was 88.8% and for high-risk tumours 86.2%. CONCLUSION The proposed image analysis system may be of value to the objective assessment of the malignancy of urine bladder carcinomas, since it relies on nuclear parameters that are employed in visual grading and their prognostic value has been proved.

[1]  C Sowter,et al.  Morphometry of bladder carcinoma: I. The automatic delineation of urothelial nuclei in tissue sections using an ibas II image array processor , 1987, The Journal of pathology.

[2]  I. D. Longstaff,et al.  Improving Co-occurrence Matrix Feature Discrimination , 1995 .

[3]  F. Debruyne,et al.  Grading in superficial bladder cancer. (1). Morphological criteria. , 1988, British journal of urology.

[4]  P. Lipponen,et al.  Classic prognostic factors, flow cytometric data, nuclear morphometric variables and mitotic indexes as predictors in transitional cell bladder cancer. , 1991, Anticancer research.

[5]  I T Young,et al.  Towards a quantitative grading of bladder tumors. , 1991, Cytometry.

[6]  Olvi L. Mangasarian,et al.  Nuclear feature extraction for breast tumor diagnosis , 1993, Electronic Imaging.

[7]  M. Boon,et al.  Morphometric grading of bladder tumors in comparison with histologic grading by pathologists. , 1983, Human pathology.

[8]  H. Niemann Recognition and Interpretation , 2002 .

[9]  Richard W. Conners,et al.  A Theoretical Comparison of Texture Algorithms , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[10]  E Bengtsson,et al.  Grading of transitional cell bladder carcinoma by image analysis of histological sections. , 1995, Analytical cellular pathology : the journal of the European Society for Analytical Cellular Pathology.

[11]  H. Tanke,et al.  Image cytometric DNA analysis in transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder , 1993, Cancer.

[12]  Patrick C. Chen,et al.  Segmentation by texture using a co-occurrence matrix and a split-and-merge algorithm☆ , 1979 .

[13]  B Stenkvist,et al.  Malignancy grading of epithelial bladder tumours. Reproducibility of grading and comparison between forceps biopsy, aspiration biopsy and exfoliative cytology. , 1977, Scandinavian journal of urology and nephrology.

[14]  C Sowter,et al.  Morphometry of bladder carcinoma: definition of a new variable. , 1990, Analytical cellular pathology : the journal of the European Society for Analytical Cellular Pathology.

[15]  Olivier D. Faugeras,et al.  Decorrelation Methods of Texture Feature Extraction , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[16]  Richard C. Dubes,et al.  Performance evaluation for four classes of textural features , 1992, Pattern Recognit..

[17]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Textural Features for Image Classification , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[18]  Michael Spann,et al.  Texture feature performance for image segmentation , 1990, Pattern Recognit..

[19]  M Petein,et al.  Computer‐assisted chromatin texture characterization of Feulgen‐stained nuclei in a series of 331 transitional bladder cell carcinomas , 1994, The Journal of pathology.

[20]  M. Boon,et al.  Analysis of the performance of pathologists in the grading of bladder tumors. , 1983, Human pathology.

[21]  William B. Thompson,et al.  Computer Diagnosis of Pneumoconiosis , 1974, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[22]  T Jarkrans,et al.  Grading of transitional cell bladder carcinoma by texture analysis of histological sections. , 1994, Analytical cellular pathology : the journal of the European Society for Analytical Cellular Pathology.

[23]  L Litwack A system for evaluation. , 1976, Nursing outlook.

[24]  R. Willén,et al.  Invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix. II. Reproducibility of a histopathologic malignancy grading system. , 1981, Acta radiologica. Oncology.

[25]  B. Norlén,et al.  Recurrence, progression and survival in bladder cancer. A retrospective analysis of 232 patients with greater than or equal to 5-year follow-up. , 2010, Scandinavian journal of urology and nephrology.

[26]  Y. Collan,et al.  Histological grading of transitional cell tumours of the bladder. Value of histological grading (WHO) in prognosis. , 1979, European urology.

[27]  Lawrence D. True,et al.  The World Health Organization/International Society of Urological Pathology consensus classification of urothelial (transitional cell) neoplasms of the urinary bladder , 1998 .

[28]  M Petein,et al.  Computerized morphonuclear cell image analyses of malignant disease in bladder tissues. , 1990, The Journal of urology.

[29]  Osamu Yoshida,et al.  Nuclear morphometry for improved prediction of the prognosis of human bladder carcinoma , 1995, Cancer.