Effects of metamorphosis on the aquatic escape response of the two-lined salamander (Eurycea bislineata).

Although numerous studies have described the escape kinematics of fishes, little is known about the aquatic escape responses of salamanders. We compare the escape kinematics of larval and adult Eurycea bislineata, the two-lined salamander, to examine the effects of metamorphosis on aquatic escape performance. We hypothesize that shape changes associated with resorption of the larval tail fin at metamorphosis will affect aquatic locomotor performance. Escape responses were recorded using high-speed video, and the effects of life stage and total length on escape kinematics were analyzed statistically using analysis of covariance. Our results show that both larval and adult E. bislineata use a two-stage escape response (similar to the C-starts of fishes) that consists of a preparatory (stage 1) and a propulsive (stage 2) stroke. The duration of both kinematic stages and the distance traveled during stage 2 increased with total length. Both larval and adult E. bislineata had final escape trajectories that were directed away from the stimulus. The main kinematic difference between larvae and adults is that adults exhibit significantly greater maximum curvature during stage 1. Total escape duration and the distance traveled during stage 2 did not differ significantly between larvae and adults. Despite the significantly lower tail aspect ratio of adults, we found no significant decrease in the overall escape performance of adult E. bislineata. Our results suggest that adults may compensate for the decrease in tail aspect ratio by increasing their maximum curvature. These findings do not support the hypothesis that larvae exhibit better locomotor performance than adults as a result of stronger selective pressures on early life stages.

[1]  D. Wake,et al.  Functional morphology and evolution of tail autotomy in salamanders , 1967, Journal of morphology.

[2]  D. Weihs,et al.  The mechanism of rapid starting of slender fish. , 1973, Biorheology.

[3]  D. Wake,et al.  Developmental and adult morphology of the vertebral column in the plethodontid salamander Eurycea bislineata, with comments on vertebral evolution in the amphibia , 1973, Journal of morphology.

[4]  Marian M. Irvin,et al.  About the Cover , 2001, Computer.

[5]  Webb Pw,et al.  The effect of size on the fast-start performance of rainbow trout Salmo cairdneri, and a consideration of piscivorous predator-prey interactions. , 1976 .

[6]  Paul W. Webb,et al.  EFFECTS OF MEDIAN-FIN AMPUTATION ON FAST-START PERFORMANCE OF RAINBOW TROUT (SALMO GAIRDNERI) , 1977 .

[7]  S. Zottoli,et al.  Correlation of the startle reflex and Mauthner cell auditory responses in unrestrained goldfish. , 1977, The Journal of experimental biology.

[8]  D L Meyer,et al.  The Mauthner-initiated startle response in teleost fish. , 1977, The Journal of experimental biology.

[9]  Paul W. Webb,et al.  Fast-start Performance and Body Form in Seven Species of Teleost Fish , 1978 .

[10]  D. Weihs,et al.  Optimal avoidance and evasion tactics in predator-prey interactions , 1984 .

[11]  Richard J. Wassersug,et al.  THE KINEMATICS OF SWIMMING IN ANURAN LARVAE , 1985 .

[12]  H. Shaffer,et al.  Functional design of the feeding mechanism in lower vertebrates: unidirectional and bidirectional flow systems in the tiger salamander , 1986 .

[13]  G. Lauder,et al.  Ontogeny of Aquatic Feeding Performance in the Eastern Newt, Notophthalmus viridescens (Salamandridae) , 1988 .

[14]  H. Shaffer,et al.  Ontogeny of functional design in tiger salamanders (Ambystoma tigrinum): Are motor patterns conserved during major morphological transformations? , 1988, Journal of morphology.

[15]  E. Brodie,et al.  Antipredator strategies of salamanders: individual and geographical variation in responses of Eurycea bislineata to snakes , 1989, Animal Behaviour.

[16]  J. Fetcho,et al.  Spinal network of the Mauthner cell. , 1991, Brain, behavior and evolution.

[17]  J. Fetcho Spinal Network of the Mauthner Cell (Part 1 of 2) , 1991 .

[18]  H. Shaffer,et al.  The Consequences of Metamorphosis on Salamander (Ambystoma) Locomotor Performance , 1991, Physiological Zoology.

[19]  R. C. Eaton,et al.  How stimulus direction determines the trajectory of the Mauthner-initiated escape response in a teleost fish. , 1991, The Journal of experimental biology.

[20]  U. Will Amphibian Mauthner cells. , 1991, Brain, behavior and evolution.

[21]  Differences in the antipredator behavior of three plethodontid salamanders to snake attack , 1991 .

[22]  Robert W. Blake,et al.  ESCAPE TRAJECTORIES IN ANGELFISH (PTEROPHYLLUM EIMEKEI) , 1993 .

[23]  R. Blake,et al.  The effect of size on the kinematics and performance of angelfish (Pterophyllum eimekei) escape responses , 1993 .

[24]  B. Prendergast,et al.  Comparative studies on the Mauthner cell of teleost fish in relation to sensory input. , 1995, Brain, behavior and evolution.

[25]  D. Carrier Ontogenetic Limits on Locomotor Performance , 1996, Physiological Zoology.

[26]  Domenici,et al.  The kinematics and performance of fish fast-start swimming , 1997, The Journal of experimental biology.

[27]  S. Vogel,et al.  Life in Moving Fluids , 2020 .

[28]  Sheila N. Patek,et al.  Vertebral Column Morphology, C-Start Curvature, and the Evolution of Mechanical Defenses in Tetraodontiform Fishes , 1998 .

[29]  Hale,et al.  Mechanics of the fast-start: muscle function and the role of intramuscular pressure in the escape behavior of amia calva and polypterus palmas , 1998, The Journal of experimental biology.

[30]  J. Petranka,et al.  Salamanders of the United States and Canada , 1998 .

[31]  Wassersug,et al.  Mechanical properties of the tadpole tail fin , 1998, The Journal of experimental biology.

[32]  Hale,et al.  Locomotor mechanics during early life history: effects of size and ontogeny on fast-start performance of salmonid fishes , 1999, The Journal of experimental biology.

[33]  M. Yamashita,et al.  Startle Response and Turning Bias in Microhyla Tadpoles , 2000 .

[34]  Richard J. Wassersug,et al.  Tadpole Locomotion: Axial Movement and Tail Functions in a Largely Vertebraeless Vertebrate1 , 2000 .

[35]  J. Buskirk,et al.  Influence of tail shape on tadpole swimming performance. , 2000, The Journal of experimental biology.

[36]  S. Babcock,et al.  Caudal vertebral development and morphology in three salamanders with complex life cycles (Ambystoma jeffersonianum, Hemidactylium scutatum, and Desmognathus ocoee) , 2001, Journal of morphology.

[37]  J. Caldwell,et al.  Predator-prey relationships among larval dragonflies, salamanders, and frogs , 1980, Oecologia.

[38]  G. Andraso A comparison of startle response in two morphs of the brook stickleback (Culaea inconstans): Further evidence for a trade-off between defensive morphology and swimming ability , 2004, Evolutionary Ecology.

[39]  G. V. Lauder,et al.  Red and white muscle activity and kinematics of the escape response of the bluegill sunfish during swimming , 1993, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[40]  Robert C. Eaton,et al.  Alternative neural pathways initiate fast-start responses following lesions of the mauthner neuron in goldfish , 1982, Journal of comparative physiology.