Phase II trial of gemcitabine in patients with pretreated advanced soft tissue sarcomas

Because of the low number of active cytotoxic drugs and their limited activity, the evaluation of new anti-cancer agents for their activity in soft tissue sarcomas is a continuing need. The objectives of this prospective phase II trial of gemcitabine were to estimate the response rate and to define the toxicities of prolonged infusions of low-dose gemcitabine in patients with pretreated advanced soft tissue sarcomas. Patients were eligible if they had a histologic diagnosis of unresectable, recurrent or metastatic, progressive soft tissue sarcoma, and if they had been treated with at least one prior chemotherapy consisting of an anthracycline- and/or ifosfamide-containing regimen. Gemcitabine was administered as a 360 min infusion on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28 day cycle. The initial dose of gemcitabine was 200 mg/m2 in all patients. Dose escalation to 250 mg/m2 was allowed in the case of stable disease and good tolerability of the drug. All 18 patients (median age 58 years) who enrolled were treated with gemcitabine, and all were assessable for toxicity, response and survival. Only two of these 18 patients had an objective response to a previous palliative chemotherapy. A median of 3 cycles (range 1-7) of gemcitabicin were administered. Two (11%) of the patients had a partial response lasting 5 and 6 months, respectively. Both of these patients had only lung metastases. Whereas one of these patients had a transient partial response to the foregoing chemotherapy (consisting of ifosfamide and doxorubicin), the other patient has been progressive on these drugs. One additional patient, progressive on ifosfamide and doxorubicin, had an objective response of greater than 50% confined to the lungs and stable local recurrence for 6 months. Six patients had stable disease for 3-6 months and nine patients had disease progression. The median survival was 8 months. Treatment generally was well tolerated with six patients having transient grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity, four having grade 3 neutropenia, and one having grade 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. Gemcitabine, given as a prolonged infusion at a low dose level, has a favorable toxicity profile and displays antitumor activity in patients with intensively pretreated, advanced soft tissue sarcomas.

[1]  O. Sezer,et al.  Prolonged infusion of gemcitabine in stage IV breast cancer: a phase I study. , 1999, Anti-cancer drugs.

[2]  C. Bokemeyer,et al.  Gemcitabine in patients with relapsed or cisplatin-refractory testicular cancer. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[3]  M. van Glabbeke,et al.  Prognostic factors for the outcome of chemotherapy in advanced soft tissue sarcoma: an analysis of 2,185 patients treated with anthracycline-containing first-line regimens--a European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group Study. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[4]  J. Carmichael,et al.  The role of gemcitabine in the treatment of other tumours. , 1998, British Journal of Cancer.

[5]  I. Tannock,et al.  Gemcitabine: a promising new agent in the treatment of advanced urothelial cancer. , 1997, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[6]  K. Goa,et al.  Gemcitabine. A review of its pharmacology and clinical potential in non-small cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer. , 1997, Drugs.

[7]  C. F. Pollera More is better but ... how is best: are milligrams over hours better than grams over minutes? The case of gemcitabine. , 1997, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[8]  S. Lippman,et al.  Maximum-tolerated dose defined for single-agent gemcitabine: a phase I dose-escalation study in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. , 1997, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  J. Abbruzzese,et al.  Phase I studies with the novel nucleoside analog gemcitabine. , 1996, Seminars in oncology.

[10]  H. Hansen,et al.  A phase I study of a 24 hour infusion of gemcitabine in previously untreated patients with inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer. , 1996, British Journal of Cancer.

[11]  F. Shepherd,et al.  Phase I dose-escalation trial of gemcitabine and cisplatin for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: usefulness of mathematic modeling to determine maximum-tolerable dose. , 1996, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[12]  G. Peters,et al.  Antitumor activity of prolonged as compared with bolus administration of 2′,2′-difluorodeoxycytidine in vivo against murine colon tumors , 1996, Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.

[13]  A. Harris,et al.  Advanced breast cancer: a phase II trial with gemcitabine. , 1995, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[14]  M. van Glabbeke,et al.  The present state of the art in chemotherapy for soft tissue sarcomas in adults: the EORTC point of view. , 1995, Critical reviews in oncology/hematology.

[15]  G. Peters,et al.  Schedule-dependent antitumor effect of gemcitabine in in vivo model system. , 1995, Seminars in oncology.

[16]  V. Heinemann,et al.  Gemcitabine: metabolism, mechanisms of action, and self-potentiation. , 1995, Seminars in oncology.

[17]  G. T. Budd,et al.  Palliative chemotherapy of adult soft tissue sarcomas. , 1995, Seminars in oncology.

[18]  H. Pinedo,et al.  The influence of the schedule and the dose of gemcitabine on the anti-tumour efficacy in experimental human cancer. , 1993, British Journal of Cancer.

[19]  H. Kantarjian,et al.  Pharmacologically directed design of the dose rate and schedule of 2',2'-difluorodeoxycytidine (Gemcitabine) administration in leukemia. , 1990, Cancer research.

[20]  R. Sylvester,et al.  Doxorubicin in relapsed soft tissue sarcoma: justification of phase II evaluation of new drugs in this disease. An EORTC Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group Study. , 1990, European journal of cancer.