A Bayesian analysis of quantal bioassay experiments incorporating historical controls via Bayes factors

This paper addresses model-based Bayesian inference in the analysis of data arising from bioassay experiments. In such experiments, increasing doses of a chemical substance are given to treatment groups (usually rats or mice) for a fixed period of time (usually 2 years). The goal of such an experiment is to determine whether an increased dosage of the chemical is associated with increased probability of an adverse effect (usually presence of adenoma or carcinoma). The data consists of dosage, survival time, and the occurrence of the adverse event for each unit in the study. To determine whether such relationship exists, this paper proposes using Bayes factors to compare two probit models, the model that assumes increasing dose effects and the model that assumes no dose effect. These models account for the survival time of each unit through a Poly-k type correction. In order to increase statistical power, the proposed approach allows the incorporation of information from control groups from previous studies. The proposed method is able to handle data with very few occurrences of the adverse event. The proposed method is compared with a variation of the Peddada test via simulation and is shown to have higher power. We demonstrate the method by applying it to the two bioassay experiment datasets previously analyzed by other authors. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  S. Chib,et al.  Marginal Likelihood From the Metropolis–Hastings Output , 2001 .

[2]  B. Carlin,et al.  Bayesian Model Choice Via Markov Chain Monte Carlo Methods , 1995 .

[3]  S. Chib,et al.  Bayesian analysis of binary and polychotomous response data , 1993 .

[4]  Hans-Georg Müller,et al.  Kernel and Probit Estimates in Quantal Bioassay , 1988 .

[5]  On the asymptotic distribution for Peto's combined test for carcinogenicity assays under equal and unequal censoring , 2001 .

[6]  S. Peddada,et al.  A Survival-Adjusted Quantal-Response Test for Analysis of Tumor Incidence Rates in Animal Carcinogenicity Studies , 2005, Environmental health perspectives.

[7]  P. Armitage Tests for Linear Trends in Proportions and Frequencies , 1955 .

[8]  Lu Wang,et al.  Analysis on binary responses with ordered covariates and missing data , 2007, Statistics in medicine.

[9]  Alan Agresti,et al.  Categorical Data Analysis , 1991, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[10]  A. Agresti Categorical data analysis , 1993 .

[11]  D. Dunson,et al.  Bayesian Multivariate Isotonic Regression Splines , 2007 .

[12]  Douglas C. Wolf,et al.  Best Practices for Use of Historical Control Data of Proliferative Rodent Lesions , 2009, Toxicologic pathology.

[13]  A J Bailer,et al.  Effects of treatment-induced mortality and tumor-induced mortality on tests for carcinogenicity in small samples. , 1988, Biometrics.

[14]  James M. Flegal,et al.  Relative fixed-width stopping rules for Markov chain Monte Carlo simulations , 2013, 1303.0238.

[15]  David B. Dunson,et al.  Bayesian incidence analysis of animal tumorigenicity data , 2001 .

[16]  Shyamal D Peddada,et al.  Incorporating Historical Control Data When Comparing Tumor Incidence Rates , 2007, Journal of the American Statistical Association.

[17]  Bailer Aj,et al.  Effects of treatment-induced mortality and tumor-induced mortality on tests for carcinogenicity in small samples. , 1988 .

[18]  Rabi Bhattacharya,et al.  Consistency and asymptotic normality of the estimated effective doses in bioassay , 2007 .

[19]  Gregg E Dinse,et al.  Comparing Tumor Rates in Current and Historical Control Groups in Rodent Cancer Bioassays , 2011, Statistics in biopharmaceutical research.

[20]  R. Kodell Should We Assess Tumorigenicity With the Peto or Poly-k Test? , 2012 .

[21]  S. Chib Marginal Likelihood from the Gibbs Output , 1995 .

[22]  Lila F. Knudsen,et al.  Principles of biological assay , 1949 .

[23]  Joseph G Ibrahim,et al.  Bayesian Methods for a Three–State Model for Rodent Carcinogenicity Studies , 2002, Biometrics.

[24]  J Wahrendorf,et al.  Guidelines for simple, sensitive significance tests for carcinogenic effects in long-term animal experiments. , 1980, IARC monographs on the evaluation of the carcinogenic risk of chemicals to humans. Supplement.

[25]  R L Williams,et al.  Ratio estimates, the delta method, and quantal response tests for increased carcinogenicity. , 1993, Biometrics.

[26]  Shyamal D Peddada,et al.  Points to Consider on the Statistical Analysis of Rodent Cancer Bioassay Data When Incorporating Historical Control Data , 2009, Toxicologic pathology.

[27]  Kassandra M. Fronczyk,et al.  A Bayesian approach to the analysis of quantal bioassay studies using nonparametric mixture models , 2014, Biometrics.

[28]  Holger Dette,et al.  A Note on Nonparametric Estimation of the Effective Dose in Quantal Bioassay , 2005 .

[29]  D. J. Finney,et al.  Probit Analysis: A Statistical Treatment of the Sigmoid Response Curve. , 1948 .

[30]  Brian Neelon,et al.  Bayesian Inference on Order‐Constrained Parameters in Generalized Linear Models , 2003, Biometrics.