Habitat mapping as a tool for conservation and sustainable use of marine resources: Some perspectives from the MAREANO Programme, Norway

Abstract One of the main goals of marine spatial management is to promote a sustainable use of marine resources without putting biodiversity and habitats at risk. Environmental status assessments of benthic habitats have traditionally been conducted on soft bottom infauna communities. These communities represent only a limited part of the total diversity of seabed environments. Large and habitat forming organisms that are particularly vulnerable to physical disturbance of the seabed are in general associated with mixed or hard substrates. Together with mobile benthos these large organisms have been poorly mapped with the traditional approach. In accordance with a demand for information on all aspects of benthic habitats there is an increasing interest in a broader mapping approach for assessments of the distribution and status of benthos. This has led to an increased demand for a broader mapping approach for assessments of the distribution and status of benthos to include as many habitats as possible. We present mapping strategies based on literature together with perspectives from Norway's MAREANO Mapping Programme ( www.mareano.no ). A first and important step is to acquire high resolution topographical information from multibeam echosounder surveys. Building upon this baseline data set, video inspection along transects can provide information about how megafauna and surface sediments relate to local and broad scale topographical features. Classification of habitats/biotopes can be carried out through the analysis of the megafauna composition and its relation to environmental variables such as depth, quantitative terrain descriptors, and substrates. Marine landscapes have several definitions but generally refer to the major features delimiting broad-scale habitats. Each landscape will include different substrates that can be subdivided into smaller biotopes with specific fauna composition, functionality and production. For these habitats and biotopes information from all sampling gears can then be used to describe a more complete community composition. Experience from recent seafloor mapping indicates that a broad approach is required to support evidence-based policy and management of benthic species, communities and habitats. The approach presented can be used to identify biologically valuable areas and assess health status for bottom habitats/biotopes in a broad set of marine

[1]  Alan R. Orpin,et al.  Towards a statistically valid method of textural sea floor characterization of benthic habitats , 2006 .

[2]  Lene Buhl-Mortensen,et al.  The MAREANO programme – A full coverage mapping of the Norwegian off-shore benthic environment and fauna , 2015 .

[3]  Jacquomo Monk,et al.  Comparison of automated classification techniques for predicting benthic biological communities using hydroacoustics and video observations , 2011 .

[4]  Stephen J. Smith,et al.  Gradient forests: calculating importance gradients on physical predictors. , 2012, Ecology.

[5]  R. Macarthur,et al.  The Theory of Island Biogeography , 1969 .

[6]  J. Strong,et al.  Objective stratification and sampling-effort allocation of ground-truthing in benthic-mapping surveys , 2010 .

[7]  K. Hornik,et al.  Unbiased Recursive Partitioning: A Conditional Inference Framework , 2006 .

[8]  S. Boitsov,et al.  Petroleum-related hydrocarbons in deep and subsurface sediments from South-Western Barents Sea. , 2011, Marine environmental research.

[9]  P. B. Mortensen,et al.  Megafaunal diversity associated with marine landscapes of northern Norway: a preliminary assessment , 2009 .

[10]  Lene Buhl-Mortensen,et al.  Biological structures as a source of habitat heterogeneity and biodiversity on the deep ocean margins , 2010 .

[11]  P. Jumars Environmental grain and polychaete species' diversity in a bathyal benthic community , 1975 .

[12]  Cynthia E. Davies,et al.  EUNIS Habitat Classification - Revised , 2004 .

[13]  Hubert L. Rees,et al.  Guidelines for the study of the epibenthos of subtidal environments , 2009 .

[14]  G. Kendrick,et al.  Modelling distribution of marine benthos from hydroacoustics and underwater video , 2008 .

[15]  D. Wright,et al.  Introduction to the Special Issue: Marine and Coastal GIS for Geomorphology, Habitat Mapping, and Marine Reserves , 2008 .

[16]  Mapping the benthos: spatial patterns of seabed-dwelling megafauna in a Swedish Fjord, as derived from opportunistic video data , 2009, Marine Biodiversity.

[17]  M. Chapman,et al.  Scales of spatial patterns of distribution of intertidal invertebrates , 1996, Oecologia.

[18]  Miroslav Dudík,et al.  A maximum entropy approach to species distribution modeling , 2004, ICML.

[19]  L. Buhl‐Mortensen,et al.  Habitat complexity and bottom fauna composition at different scales on the continental shelf and slope of northern Norway , 2012, Hydrobiologia.

[20]  J. Guinan,et al.  Multiscale Terrain Analysis of Multibeam Bathymetry Data for Habitat Mapping on the Continental Slope , 2007 .

[21]  D. Ierodiaconou,et al.  Hydro-acoustic remote sensing of benthic biological communities on the shallow South East Australian continental shelf , 2009 .

[22]  M. Araújo,et al.  Consequences of spatial autocorrelation for niche‐based models , 2006 .

[23]  J. Pineda LINKING LARVAL SETTLEMENT TO LARVAL TRANSPORT: ASSUMPTIONS, POTENTIALS, AND PITFALLS , 2000 .

[24]  Mark John Costello Distinguishing marine habitat classification concepts for ecological data management , 2009 .

[25]  Michael Elliott,et al.  Ecology of marine sediments : from science to management , 2009 .

[26]  Peter Arnold,et al.  Seabed Biodiversity on the Continental Shelf of the Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area , 2007 .

[27]  S. Boitsov,et al.  Sources of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in marine sediments from southern and northern areas of the Norwegian continental shelf. , 2013, Marine environmental research.

[28]  Craig J. Brown,et al.  Benthic habitat mapping: A review of progress towards improved understanding of the spatial ecology of the seafloor using acoustic techniques , 2011 .

[29]  Lene Buhl-Mortensen,et al.  Monitoring marine populations and communities: methods dealing with imperfect detectability , 2012 .

[30]  R. Doyle Settlement of Planktonic Larvae: A Theory of Habitat Selection in Varying Environments , 1975, The American Naturalist.

[31]  L. Levin,et al.  ENVIRONMENTAL INFLUENCES ON REGIONAL DEEP-SEA SPECIES DIVERSITY , 2001 .

[32]  L. Buhl-Jensen The benthic amphipod fauna of the west-norwegian continental shelf compared with the fauna of five adjacent fjords , 1986 .

[33]  Cynthia E. Davies,et al.  EUNIS HABITAT CLASSIFICATION REVISED 2004 , 2004 .

[34]  T. Bailey Spatial Analysis: A Guide for Ecologists , 2006 .

[35]  M. Fortin,et al.  Spatial pattern and ecological analysis , 1989, Vegetatio.

[36]  Mark E. Taylor,et al.  National frameworks for marine conservation — a hierarchical geophysical approach , 2000 .

[37]  Thomas Kirk Sørensen,et al.  Monitoring and evaluation of spatially managed areas: A generic framework for implementation of ecosystem based marine management and its application , 2013 .

[38]  Lene Buhl-Mortensen,et al.  Deep-water corals and their habitats in The Gully, a submarine canyon off Atlantic Canada , 2005 .

[39]  D. Ierodiaconou,et al.  Marine benthic habitat mapping using Multibeam data, georeferencedvideo and image classification techniques in Victoria, Australia , 2007 .

[40]  L. Buhl‐Mortensen,et al.  Benthic foraminifera along an offshore-fjord gradient: a comparison with amphipods and molluscs , 1999 .

[41]  Lene Buhl-Mortensen,et al.  The use of benthic indicators in Europe: from the Water Framework Directive to the Marine Strategy Framework Directive. , 2010, Marine pollution bulletin.

[42]  R. Carney Zonation of deep biota on continental margins , 2005 .

[43]  Pål Buhl-Mortensen,et al.  An evaluation of compiled single-beam bathymetry data as a basis for regional sediment and biotope mapping , 2014 .

[44]  Tim Stevens,et al.  Testing the utility of abiotic surrogates for marine habitat mapping at scales relevant to management , 2004 .

[45]  Lene Buhl-Mortensen,et al.  Prediction of benthic biotopes on a Norwegian offshore bank using a combination of multivariate analysis and GIS classification , 2009 .

[46]  Stephen J. Smith,et al.  Exploring the role of environmental variables in shaping patterns of seabed biodiversity composition in regional‐scale ecosystems , 2012, The Journal of applied ecology.

[47]  Deidre Sullivan,et al.  A classification scheme for deep seafloor habitats , 1999 .

[48]  M. Lindegarth,et al.  Predicting the distribution of out-of-reach biotopes with decision trees in a Swedish marine protected area. , 2012, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[49]  G. Fader,et al.  Benthic habitat mapping on the Scotian Shelf based on multibeam bathymetry, surficial geology and sea floor photographs , 2001 .

[50]  Antoine Guisan,et al.  Spatial modelling of biodiversity at the community level , 2006 .

[51]  Gay A. Bradshaw,et al.  Landscape Heterogeneity Effects on Scaling and Monitoring Large Areas Using Remote Sensing Data , 2000, Ann. GIS.

[52]  L. Buhl‐Mortensen,et al.  Developing seabed nature-type maps offshore Norway: initial results from the MAREANO programme , 2009 .

[53]  Ter Braak,et al.  Canoco reference manual and CanoDraw for Windows user''s guide: software for canonical community ord , 2002 .