Attenuation of high‐frequency shear waves in the crust: Measurements from New York State, South Africa, and southern California

We compare the attenuation of high-frequency (3–30 Hz) shear waves for crustal paths in New York State, South Africa, and southern California over source-receiver distances of about 10–400 km. The data consist of digital recordings of S waves (Δ = 5–100 km) and Lg waves (Δ = 100–400 km) produced by earthquakes. We use a coda normalization method to remove the effects of site amplification and source excitation from the amplitudes of the S and Lg waves. Over the entire distance range studied (10–400 km), the amplitude decay of 3-Hz shear wave energy is considerably less for the tectonicaily stable areas of New York and South Africa than for the tectonicaily active region of southern California. High-frequency (30 Hz) S wave attenuation is significantly less for New York and South Africa than for southern California, for distances between 15 and 90 km. We parameterize the decay with distance (R) of coda-normalized shear wave amplitudes with a frequency-independent Q and geometrical spreading exponent γ, where geometrical spreading is proportional to R−γ. For New York State the S wave amplitude decay (3–30 Hz) is well described by a frequency-independent Q of 2100−330+490 and γ of 1.3±0.1. The decay of Lg wave amplitudes from 3 to 15 Hz in the New York State region is fit with a frequency-independent Q of 1600−280+330 γ of 0.70±0.2. The S wave amplitudes (3–30Hz) in South Africa yield a Q of 1500−190+380 and γ of 1.3±0.1. Fixing the geometrical spreading at R−0.5 produces an Lg wave Q estimate at 3 Hz in South Africa of 360−50+80. This Lg wave Q is low considering that South Africa is a cratonic, tectonicaily stable area. The S wave amplitudes from southern California are described with a frequency-independent Q of 800−150+240 and a large geometrical spreading exponent of γ of 1.9±0.2. We find an Lg wave Q at 3 Hz of 260±30 for southern California, after constraining the geometrical spreading at R−0.5.

[1]  Arthur Frankel,et al.  Energy-flux model of seismic coda: Separation of scattering and intrinsic attenuation , 1987 .

[2]  K. Aki,et al.  Origin of coda waves: Source, attenuation, and scattering effects , 1975 .

[3]  L. M. Baker,et al.  Attenuation near Anza, California , 1988 .

[4]  S. Gregersen.  Lg-wave propagation and crustal structure differences near Denmark and the North Sea , 1984 .

[5]  K. Priestley,et al.  Measurement of frequency dependent Lg attenuation in the Great Basin , 1986 .

[6]  G. A. Bollinger,et al.  On the relation between modified Mercalli intensity and body-wave magnitude , 1979, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[7]  Robert B. Herrmann,et al.  Lg attenuation and source studies using 1982 Miramichi data , 1987 .

[8]  K. Jacob,et al.  The 11/25/88, M=6 Saguenay Earthquake near Chicoutimi, Quebec: Evidence for anisotropic wave propaga , 1989 .

[9]  L. M. Baker,et al.  The Anza array: A high-dynamic-range, broadband, digitally radiotelemetered seismic array , 1984 .

[10]  Jack F. Evernden,et al.  An Evaluation of Seismic Decoupling and Underground Nuclear Test Monitoring Using High-Frequency Seismic Data (Paper 5R0913) , 1986 .

[11]  B. G. Brooks,et al.  Travel times and amplitudes of principal body phases recorded from gnome , 1962 .

[12]  C. E. Mann,et al.  Wide-angle deep crustal reflections in the northern Appalachians , 1987 .

[13]  Roger D. Borcherdt,et al.  A general earthquake-observation system (GEOS) , 1985 .

[14]  Robert B. Herrmann,et al.  The effect of crustal structure on strong ground motion attenuation relations in eastern North America , 1987 .

[15]  T. Rautian,et al.  The use of the coda for determination of the earthquake source spectrum , 1978, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[16]  F. Press.  Seismic wave attenuation in the crust , 1964 .

[17]  A. Frankel,et al.  Reply to K. Aki's “Comment on ‘microearthquake spectra from the Anza, California seismic network: Site response and source scaling’” , 1989, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[18]  Gordon F. West,et al.  A novel technique for measuring Lg attenuation—results from Eastern Canada between 1 to 10 hz , 1987 .

[19]  L. M. Baker,et al.  The digital array at Anza, California: Processing and initial interpretation of source parameters , 1987 .

[20]  K. Aki.  Analysis of the seismic coda of local earthquakes as scattered waves , 1969 .

[21]  I. Gupta,et al.  Attenuation of ground motion in the Eastern United States , 1987 .

[22]  R. Kind,et al.  The reflectivity method for a buried source , 1977 .

[23]  James N. Brune,et al.  Spectral attenuation of SH waves along the Imperial fault , 1982 .

[24]  Keiiti Aki,et al.  Attenuation of shear-waves in the lithosphere for frequencies from 0.05 to 25 Hz , 1980 .

[25]  K. Aki.  Scattering and attenuation of shear waves in the lithosphere , 1980 .

[26]  Robert B. Herrmann,et al.  Regionalization of crustal coda Q in the continental United States , 1983 .

[27]  M. Bouchon.  The complete synthesis of seismic crustal phases at regional distances , 1982 .

[28]  B. Kennett.  On regional S , 1985 .

[29]  Ronald N. Bracewell,et al.  The Fourier Transform and Its Applications , 1966 .

[30]  H. Hasegawa.  Attenuation of Lg waves in the Canadian Shield , 1985 .

[31]  辻浦 賢,et al.  Spectral Analysis of the Coda Waves from Local Earthquakes. , 1978 .