Geometric Pricing: How Low Dimensionality Helps in Approximability

Consider the following toy problem. There are $m$ rectangles and $n$ points on the plane. Each rectangle $R$ is a consumer with budget $B_R$, who is interested in purchasing the cheapest item (point) inside R, given that she has enough budget. Our job is to price the items to maximize the revenue. This problem can also be defined on higher dimensions. We call this problem the geometric pricing problem. In this paper, we study a new class of problems arising from a geometric aspect of the pricing problem. It intuitively captures typical real-world assumptions that have been widely studied in marketing research, healthcare economics, etc. It also helps classify other well-known pricing problems, such as the highway pricing problem and the graph vertex pricing problem on planar and bipartite graphs. Moreover, this problem turns out to have close connections to other natural geometric problems such as the geometric versions of the unique coverage and maximum feasible subsystem problems. We show that the low dimensionality arising in this pricing problem does lead to improved approximation ratios, by presenting sublinear-approximation algorithms for two central versions of the problem: unit-demand uniform-budget min-buying and single-minded pricing problems. Our algorithm is obtained by combining algorithmic pricing and geometric techniques. These results suggest that considering geometric aspect might be a promising research direction in obtaining improved approximation algorithms for such pricing problems. To the best of our knowledge, this is one of very few problems in the intersection between geometry and algorithmic pricing areas. Thus its study may lead to new algorithmic techniques that could benefit both areas.

[1]  Baruch Schieber,et al.  A quasi-PTAS for unsplittable flow on line graphs , 2006, STOC '06.

[2]  Patrick Briest,et al.  Uniform Budgets and the Envy-Free Pricing Problem , 2008, ICALP.

[3]  J. Bettman,et al.  Effects of Prior Knowledge and Experience and Phase of the Choice Process on Consumer Decision Processes: A Protocol Analysis , 1980 .

[4]  Micha Sharir,et al.  Small-Size $\eps$-Nets for Axis-Parallel Rectangles and Boxes , 2010, SIAM J. Comput..

[5]  Bernard Chazelle,et al.  The discrepancy method - randomness and complexity , 2000 .

[6]  Maria-Florina Balcan,et al.  Mechanism design via machine learning , 2005, 46th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS'05).

[7]  Avrim Blum,et al.  Near-optimal online auctions , 2005, SODA '05.

[8]  D. R. Fulkerson Note on Dilworth’s decomposition theorem for partially ordered sets , 1956 .

[9]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  Adaptive Strategy Selection in Decision Making. , 1988 .

[10]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  An Evaluation Cost Model of Consideration Sets , 1990 .

[11]  P. Glynn,et al.  Opportunities and challenges in using online preference data for vehicle pricing: A case study at General Motors , 2006 .

[12]  Jason D. Hartline,et al.  Knapsack auctions , 2006, SODA '06.

[13]  R. Kohli,et al.  Probabilistic Subset-Conjunctive Models for Heterogeneous Consumers , 2005 .

[14]  Saurabh Ray,et al.  Conflict-Free Coloring for Rectangle Ranges Using O(n.382) Colors , 2012, Discret. Comput. Geom..

[15]  Danny Segev,et al.  A Sublogarithmic Approximation for Highway and Tollbooth Pricing , 2010, ICALP.

[16]  W. Schnyder Planar graphs and poset dimension , 1989 .

[17]  Khaled M. Elbassioni,et al.  Conflict-free coloring for rectangle ranges using O(n.382) colors , 2007, SPAA '07.

[18]  Walter Schnyder,et al.  Embedding planar graphs on the grid , 1990, SODA '90.

[19]  Sampath Kannan,et al.  Improved Hardness Results for Profit Maximization Pricing Problems with Unlimited Supply , 2012, APPROX-RANDOM.

[20]  David S. Johnson,et al.  Some Simplified NP-Complete Graph Problems , 1976, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[21]  Richard J. Lipton,et al.  Graph Pricing Problem on Bounded Treewidth, Bounded Genus and k-Partite Graphs , 2012, Chic. J. Theor. Comput. Sci..

[22]  D. Gensch A Two-Stage Disaggregate Attribute Choice Model , 1987 .

[23]  Fabrizio Grandoni,et al.  Pricing on paths: a PTAS for the highway problem , 2011, SODA '11.

[24]  J. Bettman An information processing theory of consumer choice , 1979 .

[25]  Timothy M. Chan Conflict-free coloring of points with respect to rectangles and approximation algorithms for discrete independent set , 2012, SoCG '12.

[26]  Micha Sharir,et al.  Davenport-Schinzel sequences and their geometric applications , 1995, Handbook of Computational Geometry.

[27]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  A componential analysis of cognitive effort in choice , 1990 .

[28]  Erik D. Demaine,et al.  Combination can be hard: approximability of the unique coverage problem , 2006, SODA '06.

[29]  Rajeev Motwani,et al.  Algorithms for Multi-product Pricing , 2004, ICALP.

[30]  Viggo Kann,et al.  Hardness of Approximating Problems on Cubic Graphs , 1997, CIAC.

[31]  Erik Jan van Leeuwen,et al.  Approximating geometric coverage problems , 2008, SODA '08.

[32]  Peter W. Glynn,et al.  A Nonparametric Approach to Multiproduct Pricing , 2006, Oper. Res..

[33]  Khaled M. Elbassioni,et al.  On the approximability of the maximum feasible subsystem problem with 0/1-coefficients , 2009, SODA.

[34]  Greg M. Allenby,et al.  A Choice Model with Conjunctive, Disjunctive, and Compensatory Screening Rules , 2004 .

[35]  Guy Kortsarz,et al.  Gap between upward and tollbooth instances , 2011 .

[36]  David Haussler,et al.  Epsilon-nets and simplex range queries , 1986, SCG '86.

[37]  Jason D. Hartline,et al.  Multi-parameter mechanism design and sequential posted pricing , 2009, STOC '10.

[38]  T. Evgeniou,et al.  Disjunctions of Conjunctions, Cognitive Simplicity, and Consideration Sets , 2010 .

[39]  Maria-Florina Balcan,et al.  Approximation Algorithms and Online Mechanisms for Item Pricing , 2007, Theory Comput..

[40]  Maria-Florina Balcan,et al.  Item pricing for revenue maximization , 2008, EC '08.

[41]  Piotr Krysta,et al.  Buying Cheap Is Expensive: Approximability of Combinatorial Pricing Problems , 2011, SIAM J. Comput..

[42]  Qing Liu,et al.  Efficient Choice Designs for a Consider-Then-Choose Model , 2011, Mark. Sci..

[43]  Steven M. Shugan The Cost Of Thinking , 1980 .

[44]  Noam Nisan,et al.  Efficient approximation of product distributions , 1998, Random Struct. Algorithms.

[45]  John W. Payne,et al.  Contingent decision behavior. , 1982 .

[46]  Tracy Kimbrel,et al.  On Hardness of Pricing Items for Single-Minded Bidders , 2009, APPROX-RANDOM.

[47]  Benjamin Van Roy,et al.  A Non-Parametric Approach to Multi-Product Pricing , 2003 .

[48]  Yan Zhang,et al.  A Quasi-PTAS for Profit-Maximizing Pricing on Line Graphs , 2007, ESA.

[49]  Venkatesan Guruswami,et al.  On profit-maximizing envy-free pricing , 2005, SODA '05.

[50]  Valerie J. Trifts,et al.  Consumer Decision Making in Online Shopping Environments: The Effects of Interactive Decision Aids , 2000 .

[51]  Khaled M. Elbassioni,et al.  Truthful Mechanisms for Exhibitions , 2010, WINE.

[52]  Yota Otachi,et al.  A Polynomial-Time Approximation Scheme for the Geometric Unique Coverage Problem on Unit Squares , 2012, SWAT.

[53]  R. P. Dilworth,et al.  A DECOMPOSITION THEOREM FOR PARTIALLY ORDERED SETS , 1950 .

[54]  Allan D. Shocker,et al.  Consideration set influences on consumer decision-making and choice: Issues, models, and suggestions , 1991 .

[55]  BORIS ARONOV,et al.  Small-size ε-nets for axis-parallel rectangles and boxes , 2009, STOC '09.