Re-use of an ontology for modelling urban energy systems

The use of ontologies for the interoperability of software models is widespread, with many applications also in the energy domain. By formulating a shared data structure and a definition of concepts and their properties, a language is created that can be used between modellers and—formalised in an ontology—between model components. When modelling energy systems, connections between different infrastructures are critical, e.g. the interaction between the gas and electricity markets or the need for various infrastructures including power, heat, water and transport in cities. While a commonly shared ontology of energy systems would be highly desirable, the fact is that different existing models or applications already use dedicated ontologies, and have been demonstrated to work well using them. To benefit from linking data sources and connecting models developed with different ontologies, a translation between concepts can be made. In this paper a model of an urban energy system built upon one ontology is initialised using energy transformation technologies defined in another ontology, thus illustrating how this common perspective might benefit researchers in the energy domain.

[1]  James Keirstead,et al.  A comparison of two ontologies for agent-based modelling of energy systems , 2010, AAMAS 2010.

[2]  Jérôme Euzenat,et al.  Towards a principled approach to semantic interoperability , 2001, OIS@IJCAI.

[3]  N. F. Noy,et al.  Ontology Development 101: A Guide to Creating Your First Ontology , 2001 .

[4]  S.D.J. McArthur,et al.  Multi-Agent Systems for Power Engineering Applications—Part II: Technologies, Standards, and Tools for Building Multi-agent Systems , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[5]  Henrik Eriksson,et al.  The evolution of Protégé: an environment for knowledge-based systems development , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[6]  Stephen McArthur,et al.  Agents for active network management and condition monitoring in the smart grid , 2010 .

[7]  Mark A. Musen,et al.  The PROMPT suite: interactive tools for ontology merging and mapping , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[8]  Jérôme Euzenat,et al.  An API for Ontology Alignment , 2004, SEMWEB.

[9]  James Keirstead,et al.  The impact of CHP planning restrictions on the eciency of urban energy systems , 2011 .

[10]  Peishen Qi,et al.  Ontology Translation on the Semantic Web , 2003, J. Data Semant..

[11]  Adam Pease,et al.  Towards a standard upper ontology , 2001, FOIS.

[12]  N. D. Hatziargyriou,et al.  Multi-Agent Systems for Power Engineering Applications—Part 2: Technologies, Standards, and Tools for Building Multi-Agent Systems , 2010 .

[13]  Bernhard Haslhofer,et al.  A Comparative Study of Mapping Solutions for Enabling Metadata Interoperability , 2008 .

[14]  Nicola Guarino,et al.  Formal Ontology and Information Systems , 1998 .

[15]  Thomas R. Gruber,et al.  A translation approach to portable ontology specifications , 1993, Knowl. Acquis..

[16]  Koen H. van Dam,et al.  Capturing socio-technical systems with agent-based modelling , 2009 .

[17]  Wolfgang Klas,et al.  A survey of techniques for achieving metadata interoperability , 2010, CSUR.

[18]  Mark Jaccard,et al.  Sustainable Fossil Fuels: The Unusual Suspect in the Quest for Clean and Enduring Energy , 2001 .