Detection of intelligent mobile target in a mobile sensor network

We study the problem of a mobile target (the mouse) trying to evade detection by one or more mobile sensors (we call such a sensor a cat) in a closed network area. We view our problem as a game between two players: the mouse, and the collection of cats forming a single (meta-)player. The game ends when the mouse falls within the sensing range of one or more cats. A cat tries to determine its optimal strategy to minimize the worst case expected detection time of the mouse. The mouse tries to determine an optimal counter movement strategy to maximize the expected detection time. We divide the problem into two cases based on the relative sensing capabilities of the cats and the mouse. When the mouse has a sensing range smaller than or equal to the cats', we develop a dynamic programming solution for the mouse's optimal strategy, assuming high level information about the cats' movement model. We discuss how the cats' chosen movement model will affect its presence matrix in the network, and hence its payoff in the game. When the mouse has a larger sensing range than the cats, we show how the mouse can determine its optimal movement strategy based on local observations of the cats' movements. We further present a coordination protocol for the cats to collaboratively catch the mouse by: 1) forming opportunistically a cohort to limit the mouse's degree of freedom in escaping detection; and 2) minimizing the overlap in the spatial coverage of the cohort's members. Extensive experimental results verify and illustrate the analytical results, and evaluate the game's payoffs as a function of several important system parameters.

[1]  S. Shankar Sastry,et al.  Probabilistic pursuit-evasion games: theory, implementation, and experimental evaluation , 2002, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[2]  Calin Belta,et al.  Hybrid control for visibility-based pursuit-evasion games , 2004, 2004 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37566).

[3]  Sampath Kannan,et al.  Randomized pursuit-evasion with limited visibility , 2004, SODA '04.

[4]  Christos H. Papadimitriou,et al.  The complexity of searching a graph , 1981, 22nd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (sfcs 1981).

[5]  Rufus Isaacs,et al.  Differential Games , 1965 .

[6]  Geoffrey A. Hollinger,et al.  Proofs and Experiments in Scalable, Near-Optimal Search by Multiple Robots , 2008, Robotics: Science and Systems.

[7]  Tracy Camp,et al.  A survey of mobility models for ad hoc network research , 2002, Wirel. Commun. Mob. Comput..

[8]  K E Trummel,et al.  Technical Note - The Complexity of the Optimal Searcher Path Problem , 1986, Oper. Res..

[9]  Donald F. Towsley,et al.  Mobility improves coverage of sensor networks , 2005, MobiHoc '05.

[10]  David A. Maltz,et al.  A performance comparison of multi-hop wireless ad hoc network routing protocols , 1998, MobiCom '98.

[11]  Donald F. Towsley,et al.  Properties of random direction models , 2005, Proceedings IEEE 24th Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies..

[12]  Sampath Kannan,et al.  Randomized pursuit-evasion in a polygonal environment , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[13]  C.J. Tomlin,et al.  Automated multiple UAV flight - the Stanford DragonFly UAV Program , 2004, 2004 43rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37601).

[14]  J.P. Hespanha,et al.  Multiple-agent probabilistic pursuit-evasion games , 1999, Proceedings of the 38th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (Cat. No.99CH36304).