Comparison of the effect of post-instruction multiple-choice and short-answer tests on delayed retention learning.

BACKGROUND People forget much of what they learn, therefore students could benefit from learning strategies that yield long-lasting knowledge. Yet surprisingly, little is known about how longterm retention is most efficiently mastered. We studied the value of teacher made in class tests as learning aids and compared two types of teacher-made tests (multiple choice and short-answer tests) with a no test (control) to determine their value as aids to retention learning. METHOD The study was conducted on two separate batches of medical undergraduate students. This study compared two types of tests [multiple choice questions (MCQs) and short answer questions (SAQs)] with a no test (control) group. The investigation involved initial testing at the end of the lecture (post instruction), followed by an unannounced delayed retention test on the same material three weeks later. The unannounced delayed test comprising of MCQs and SAQs on the same material was given three weeks later to all the three groups. RESULTS In batch I, the MCQ group had a higher mean delayed retention score of 10.97, followed by the SAQ group (8.42) and the control group (6.71). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) test and least significance difference (LSD) post hoc test revealed statistically significant difference between the means of the three groups. Similar results were obtained for batch II CONCLUSION: Classroom testing has a positive effect on retention learning; both short-answer and multiple-choice tests being more effective than no test in promoting delayed retention learning, however, multiple-choice tests are better.

[1]  Henry L. Roediger,et al.  Repeated retrieval during learning is the key to long-term retention , 2007 .

[2]  Edward Vul,et al.  What types of learning are enhanced by a cued recall test? , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[3]  Jeffrey D. Karpicke,et al.  Test-Enhanced Learning , 2006, Psychological science.

[4]  O. Duell,et al.  Multiple-Choice Test Items: What Are Textbook Authors Telling Teachers?. , 1990 .

[5]  W. A. Mehrens,et al.  Using Teacher-Made Measurement Devices , 1987 .

[6]  Richard J. Stiggins,et al.  Classroom Assessment: A Key To Effective Education , 1986 .

[7]  Richard J. Stiggins,et al.  THE ECOLOGY OF CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT , 1985 .

[8]  A. Gullickson,et al.  Post Hoc Analysis of Teacher-Made Tests: The Goodness-of-Fit Between Prescription and Practice , 1985 .

[9]  Katherine Carter.  Do Teachers Understand Principles for Writing Tests ? , 1984 .

[10]  Philippe C. Duchastel,et al.  Testing versus review: Effects on retention. , 1982 .

[11]  Philippe C. Duchastel,et al.  Retention of prose following testing with different types of tests , 1981 .

[12]  William J. Haynie,et al.  Effects of Multiple-Choice and Short-Answer Tests on Delayed Retention Learning , 1994 .

[13]  G. E. Rogers.  Post Hoc Analysis of Test Items Written by Technology Education Teachers , 1992 .

[14]  Michael W. Galbraith.  Effects of Take-Home and In-Class Tests on Delayed Retention Learning Acquired via Individualized, Self-paced Instructional Texts. , 1991 .

[15]  W. Haynie.  Effects of Tests and Anticipation of Tests on Learning via Videotaped Materials. , 1990 .

[16]  Anthony J. Nitko,et al.  Designing tests that are integrated with instruction. , 1989 .

[17]  Arthur I. Gates,et al.  Recitation As a Factor in Memorizing , 1917 .