Effects of Discourse Type on Recall

Discourse can be organized in different ways; four of these ways are comparison, problem/solution, causation, and a collection of descriptions. These four discourse types correspond to schemata that vary in their organizational components; these differences were expected to result in differences in processing text. The more organized discourse types of comparison, problem/solution, and causation were predicted to yield superior recall of information than when this same information was cast as a collection of descriptions about a topic. The data from two studies support the hypothesized facilitation of the more organized types of discourse and have implications for understanding memory and writing instructional materials.

[1]  Harold L. Herber.  Developing study skills in secondary schools , 1965 .

[2]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Taking different perspectives on a story. , 1977 .

[3]  Bruce K. Britton,et al.  Reading and cognitive capacity usage: Effects of text difficulty. , 1978 .

[4]  B. Meyer.  The organization of prose and its effects on memory , 1975 .

[5]  B. Meyer.  Use of Top-Level Structure in Text: Key for Reading Comprehension of Ninth-Grade Students. , 1980 .

[6]  E. Thompson.  An experimental investigation of the relative effectiveness of organizational structure in oral communication , 1960 .

[7]  E. Kozminsky,et al.  Altering comprehension: The effect of biasing titles on text comprehension , 1977, Memory & cognition.

[8]  Nancy L. Stein,et al.  The effects of organization and instructional set on story memory , 1978 .

[9]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Recall of Previously Unrecallable Information Following a Shift in Perspective. Technical Report No. 41. , 1977 .

[10]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Schooling and the Acquisition of Knowledge , 1978 .

[11]  G. Bower.  Organizational factors in memory. , 1970 .

[12]  Marilyn J. Haring,et al.  Comprehension of stories and expository text , 1980 .

[13]  R. Reynolds,et al.  Influence of questions on the allocation of attention during reading. , 1980, Journal of educational psychology.

[14]  Joseph E. Grimes,et al.  The Thread of Discourse , 1984 .

[15]  G. Mandler.  Organization and Memory , 1967 .

[16]  Perry W. Thorndyke,et al.  A critique of schemata as a theory of human story memory , 1979 .

[17]  L. T. Frase.  Integration of Written Text. , 1973 .

[18]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  The sequencing of instruction and the concept of assimilation-to-schema , 1977 .

[19]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Recall and Readability of Short Prose Passages. , 1980 .

[20]  R. Mayer.  Aids to text comprehension , 1984 .

[21]  N. S. Johnson,et al.  Remembrance of things parsed: Story structure and recall , 1977, Cognitive Psychology.

[22]  Lane Cooper,et al.  The Rhetoric of Aristotle. , 1933 .

[23]  Barbara Hayes-Roth,et al.  Human Processing of Knowledge from Texts: Acquisition, Integration, and Reasoning , 1979 .

[24]  B. Meyer,et al.  The interaction of reader strategies and the organization of text , 1982 .

[25]  G W McConkie,et al.  What is recalled after hearing a passage? , 1973, Journal of educational psychology.

[26]  Aristotle,et al.  The Rhetoric of Aristotle , 1886 .

[27]  Bonnie J. F. Meyer,et al.  Reading Research and the Composition Teacher: The Importance of Plans. , 1982 .

[28]  P. Thorndyke.  Cognitive structures in comprehension and memory of narrative discourse , 1977, Cognitive Psychology.