Now you see, now you don’t … the influence of visual occlusion on racket and ball kinematics in the tennis serve

Abstract The serve is considered amongst the most important strokes in tennis. Not surprisingly, the development of a mechanically consistent and proficient serve is paramount. Correspondingly, drills that involve players serving with their eyes closed are thought to promote mechanical consistency. The purpose of this study was therefore to contrast the effect of the removal of visual feedback on ball and racket kinematics in the serve. A 10-camera 500-Hz VICON MX motion analysis system recorded the service actions of eight elite young players as they performed three serves with eyes open and three serves with eyes closed. Removal of vision resulted in considerable differences in both racket and ball kinematics, with players failing to make contact on 16 of 24 serves. Temporally, the preparation phase was significantly shorter with eyes closed. Spatially, the ball was located 6.5 cm further to the right at zenith, and 13 cm higher at impact with eyes closed. These results highlight that the serve is not entirely pre-programmable, and that visual feedback is critical to the spatiotemporal regulation of the serve. In turn, coaches need to be aware of the implications of modifying visual feedback in serve, and ensure that the consequence is congruent with their intent.

[1]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[2]  R E Bahamonde,et al.  Changes in angular momentum during the tennis serve , 2000, Journal of sports sciences.

[3]  Damian Farrow,et al.  Exploring the kinaesthetic sensitivity of skilled performers for implementing movement instructions. , 2015, Human movement science.

[4]  Mark S. Kovacs,et al.  Movement for Tennis: The Importance of Lateral Training , 2009 .

[5]  Ricardo Weigert Coelho,et al.  Imagery Intervention in Open and Closed Tennis Motor Skill Performance , 2007, Perceptual and motor skills.

[6]  Jacqueline Alderson,et al.  Lower-limb coordination and shoulder joint mechanics in the tennis serve. , 2008, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[7]  D. Robertson,et al.  The kinematics, movement phasing and timing of a skilled action in response to varying conditions of uncertainty , 1985 .

[8]  Rajiv Ranganathan,et al.  Motor synergies: feedback and error compensation within and between trials , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[9]  M. Reid,et al.  Another day, another tennis coaching intervention, but does this one do what coaches purport? , 2015, Sports biomechanics.

[10]  R. Magill Motor learning and control : concepts and applications , 2004 .

[11]  Machar Reid,et al.  Effect of skill decomposition on racket and ball kinematics of the elite junior tennis serve , 2010, Sports biomechanics.

[12]  Richard Kulpa,et al.  Energy Flow Analysis During the Tennis Serve , 2014, The American journal of sports medicine.

[13]  K. Davids,et al.  Changing ecological constraints of practice alters coordination of dynamic interceptive actions , 2007 .

[14]  Keith Davids,et al.  Movement Models from Sports Reveal Fundamental Insights into Coordination Processes , 2005, Exercise and sport sciences reviews.

[15]  Machar Reid,et al.  REDEFINING SPATIAL CONSISTENCY IN THE BALL TOSS OF THE PROFESSIONAL FEMALE TENNIS SERVE , 2014 .

[16]  Bruce Elliott,et al.  Contributions of Upper Limb Segment Rotations during the Power Serve in Tennis , 1995 .

[17]  B C Elliott,et al.  Comparison of endpoint data treatment methods for estimation of kinematics and kinetics near impact during the tennis serve. , 2012, Journal of applied biomechanics.

[18]  Asif Ali,et al.  Noise Distraction and Mental Practice in Closed and Open Motor Skills , 2014, Perceptual and motor skills.

[19]  Young-Tae Lim,et al.  Comparing the pre- and post-impact ball and racquet kinematics of elite tennis players' first and second serves: a preliminary study , 2003, Journal of sports sciences.

[20]  Bruce Elliott,et al.  A Three-Dimensional Cinematographic Analysis of the Tennis Serve , 1986 .

[21]  Geoffrey D Abrams,et al.  Biomechanical analysis of three tennis serve types using a markerless system , 2012, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[22]  R. Bootsma,et al.  Timing an attacking forehand drive in table tennis. , 1990 .

[23]  Machar Reid,et al.  Effect of a common task constraint on the body, racket, and ball kinematics of the elite junior tennis serve , 2013, Sports biomechanics.

[24]  Brendan Lay,et al.  Coordination and variability in the elite female tennis serve , 2015, Journal of sports sciences.

[25]  A. Williams,et al.  Visual search strategies in experienced and inexperienced soccer players. , 1994, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[26]  Casto Juan-Recio,et al.  Variable training: effects on velocity and accuracy in the tennis serve , 2014, Journal of sports sciences.

[27]  Keith Davids,et al.  Motor learning in practice : a constraints-led approach , 2010 .

[28]  Alfred W. Hubbard,et al.  Visual Movements of Batters , 1954 .

[29]  Brendan Lay,et al.  A kinematic comparison of successful and unsuccessful tennis serves across the elite development pathway. , 2013, Human movement science.